Streaming Technologies and Serialization Protocols: Empirical Performance Analysis

Read original: arXiv:2407.13494 - Published 7/19/2024 by Samuel Jackson, Nathan Cummings, Saiful Khan
Total Score

0

Streaming Technologies and Serialization Protocols: Empirical Performance Analysis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the performance of different streaming technologies and serialization protocols
  • Conducts an empirical analysis to understand the tradeoffs between various options
  • Covers data streaming, messaging systems, serialization protocols, web services, and applications

Plain English Explanation

This paper takes a close look at the performance of different technologies and protocols used for data streaming and messaging. The researchers wanted to understand the pros and cons of various approaches, such as how fast they can transmit data, how efficient they are, and how they handle things like security and reliability.

They conducted a series of experiments to evaluate the performance of these systems in real-world conditions. For example, they might have tested how quickly a system can transmit a large video file or how much overhead is required to encrypt the data. By analyzing the results, they were able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each option.

The goal was to provide a practical guide to help developers and engineers choose the best technologies for their specific streaming applications. The findings could also inform the design of new data collection systems or large-scale electron microscopy projects that rely on efficient data streaming.

Technical Explanation

The researchers evaluated the performance of various streaming technologies and serialization protocols used in modern data systems. They set up a series of experiments to measure key metrics like throughput, latency, and CPU/memory utilization.

The experimental setup included different messaging systems (e.g., Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ), web service frameworks (e.g., gRPC, REST), and serialization formats (e.g., JSON, Protocol Buffers, Apache Avro). The researchers tested the performance of these components under various workloads and network conditions to simulate real-world scenarios.

By analyzing the results, the team was able to identify the trade-offs between factors like speed, efficiency, and ease of use. For example, they found that Protocol Buffers offered higher throughput than JSON, but required more code complexity. Likewise, gRPC had lower latency than REST, but consumed more system resources.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed empirical study of streaming technologies and serialization protocols. The experimental setup appears robust, and the authors have clearly put a lot of thought into testing a wide range of real-world scenarios.

However, one potential limitation is that the study is focused on a relatively narrow set of technologies and protocols. While the authors have covered many of the most popular options, there may be other emerging solutions that were not included in the analysis. Additionally, the performance characteristics of these systems can be highly dependent on the specific hardware, network, and workload conditions, so the results may not be fully generalizable.

Another area for potential further research could be the impact of different security and reliability mechanisms on performance. The paper touches on these aspects, but a more detailed exploration of how encryption, authentication, and fault tolerance affect the various systems could provide additional insights.

Conclusion

This paper offers a valuable empirical analysis of the performance characteristics of streaming technologies and serialization protocols. The findings can help developers and engineers make more informed decisions when choosing the right tools for their data streaming applications.

The tradeoffs identified in the study, such as the speed-complexity trade-off for serialization formats or the latency-resource trade-off for web service frameworks, can guide the design of efficient and reliable data collection systems and large-scale data streaming projects. By understanding the performance characteristics of these core technologies, researchers and practitioners can build more effective stream processing systems that can unlock new scientific and technological breakthroughs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Streaming Technologies and Serialization Protocols: Empirical Performance Analysis
Total Score

0

Streaming Technologies and Serialization Protocols: Empirical Performance Analysis

Samuel Jackson, Nathan Cummings, Saiful Khan

Efficiently streaming high-volume data is essential for real-time data analytics, visualization, and AI and machine learning model training. Various streaming technologies and serialization protocols have been developed to meet different streaming needs. Together, they perform differently across various tasks and datasets. Therefore, when developing a streaming system, it can be challenging to make an informed decision on the suitable combination, as we encountered when implementing streaming for the UKAEA's MAST data or SKA's radio astronomy data. This study addresses this gap by proposing an empirical study of widely used data streaming technologies and serialization protocols. We introduce an extensible and open-source software framework to benchmark their efficiency across various performance metrics. Our findings reveal significant performance differences and trade-offs between these technologies. These insights can help in choosing suitable streaming and serialization solutions for contemporary data challenges. We aim to provide the scientific community and industry professionals with the knowledge to optimize data streaming for better data utilization and real-time analysis.

Read more

7/19/2024

A Comprehensive Benchmarking Analysis of Fault Recovery in Stream Processing Frameworks
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Benchmarking Analysis of Fault Recovery in Stream Processing Frameworks

Adriano Vogel, Soren Henning, Esteban Perez-Wohlfeil, Otmar Ertl, Rick Rabiser

Nowadays, several software systems rely on stream processing architectures to deliver scalable performance and handle large volumes of data in near real-time. Stream processing frameworks facilitate scalable computing by distributing the application's execution across multiple machines. Despite performance being extensively studied, the measurement of fault tolerance-a key feature offered by stream processing frameworks-has still not been measured properly with updated and comprehensive testbeds. Moreover, the impact that fault recovery can have on performance is mostly ignored. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of fault recovery performance, stability, and recovery time in a cloud-native environment with modern open-source frameworks, namely Flink, Kafka Streams, and Spark Structured Streaming. Our benchmarking analysis is inspired by chaos engineering to inject failures. Generally, our results indicate that much has changed compared to previous studies on fault recovery in distributed stream processing. In particular, the results indicate that Flink is the most stable and has one of the best fault recovery. Moreover, Kafka Streams shows performance instabilities after failures, which is due to its current rebalancing strategy that can be suboptimal in terms of load balancing. Spark Structured Streaming shows suitable fault recovery performance and stability, but with higher event latency. Our study intends to (i) help industry practitioners in choosing the most suitable stream processing framework for efficient and reliable executions of data-intensive applications; (ii) support researchers in applying and extending our research method as well as our benchmark; (iii) identify, prevent, and assist in solving potential issues in production deployments.

Read more

5/30/2024

Total Score

0

High-level Stream Processing: A Complementary Analysis of Fault Recovery

Adriano Vogel, Soren Henning, Esteban Perez-Wohlfeil, Otmar Ertl, Rick Rabiser

Parallel computing is very important to accelerate the performance of software systems. Additionally, considering that a recurring challenge is to process high data volumes continuously, stream processing emerged as a paradigm and software architectural style. Several software systems rely on stream processing to deliver scalable performance, whereas open-source frameworks provide coding abstraction and high-level parallel computing. Although stream processing's performance is being extensively studied, the measurement of fault tolerance--a key abstraction offered by stream processing frameworks--has still not been adequately measured with comprehensive testbeds. In this work, we extend the previous fault recovery measurements with an exploratory analysis of the configuration space, additional experimental measurements, and analysis of improvement opportunities. We focus on robust deployment setups inspired by requirements for near real-time analytics of a large cloud observability platform. The results indicate significant potential for improving fault recovery and performance. However, these improvements entail grappling with configuration complexities, particularly in identifying and selecting the configurations to be fine-tuned and determining the appropriate values for them. Therefore, new abstractions for transparent configuration tuning are also needed for large-scale industry setups. We believe that more software engineering efforts are needed to provide insights into potential abstractions and how to achieve them. The stream processing community and industry practitioners could also benefit from more interactions with the high-level parallel programming community, whose expertise and insights on making parallel programming more productive and efficient could be extended.

Read more

5/14/2024

Accelerating Time-to-Science by Streaming Detector Data Directly into Perlmutter Compute Nodes
Total Score

0

Accelerating Time-to-Science by Streaming Detector Data Directly into Perlmutter Compute Nodes

Samuel S. Welborn, Bjoern Enders, Chris Harris, Peter Ercius, Deborah J. Bard

Recent advancements in detector technology have significantly increased the size and complexity of experimental data, and high-performance computing (HPC) provides a path towards more efficient and timely data processing. However, movement of large data sets from acquisition systems to HPC centers introduces bottlenecks owing to storage I/O at both ends. This manuscript introduces a streaming workflow designed for an high data rate electron detector that streams data directly to compute node memory at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), thereby avoiding storage I/O. The new workflow deploys ZeroMQ-based services for data production, aggregation, and distribution for on-the-fly processing, all coordinated through a distributed key-value store. The system is integrated with the detector's science gateway and utilizes the NERSC Superfacility API to initiate streaming jobs through a web-based frontend. Our approach achieves up to a 14-fold increase in data throughput and enhances predictability and reliability compared to a I/O-heavy file-based transfer workflow. Our work highlights the transformative potential of streaming workflows to expedite data analysis for time-sensitive experiments.

Read more

5/14/2024