Reference-Free Image Quality Metric for Degradation and Reconstruction Artifacts

Read original: arXiv:2405.02208 - Published 5/6/2024 by Han Cui, Alfredo De Goyeneche, Efrat Shimron, Boyuan Ma, Michael Lustig
Total Score

0

Reference-Free Image Quality Metric for Degradation and Reconstruction Artifacts

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Proposes a reference-free image quality metric to assess degradation and reconstruction artifacts
  • Leverages simple generative representations to capture key perceptual attributes of images
  • Demonstrates effectiveness on various image quality tasks, including compression, denoising, and super-resolution

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to measure the quality of images, without needing a reference or "perfect" image for comparison. This is useful when you have an image that has been altered or processed in some way, and you want to know how good it is compared to the original.

The key idea is to use simple mathematical models, called "generative representations," to capture the important features of the image that affect how we perceive its quality. These features might include things like sharpness, color, and texture. By analyzing how well the image matches these models, the method can provide a reliable quality score without needing the original image.

This approach could be helpful in a variety of applications, such as compressive sampling, image denoising, and image super-resolution. It could also potentially be used to defend against adversarial attacks on image quality metrics.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a reference-free image quality assessment (RFIQA) method that leverages simple generative representations to capture key perceptual attributes of images. The approach is based on the observation that human perception of image quality is closely tied to the statistical properties of natural images, which can be modeled using simple probabilistic models.

The method first extracts low-level features from the input image, such as gradients, color statistics, and local textural information. These features are then used to fit simple generative models, such as Gaussian mixtures and sparse coding dictionaries. The quality of the image is then assessed by measuring how well the image matches these generative models, using metrics like log-likelihood and reconstruction error.

The authors evaluate their RFIQA method on a variety of image quality tasks, including compression, denoising, and super-resolution. They show that the proposed approach outperforms existing no-reference quality metrics, and is effective at detecting both degradation and reconstruction artifacts. The method is also shown to be robust to adversarial attacks that aim to fool image quality assessment algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The proposed RFIQA method is a promising approach to image quality assessment, as it does not require a reference image and can capture a wide range of perceptual attributes. The authors provide a thorough evaluation of the method on several benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness.

However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of the approach. For example, the generative models used in the method may not be able to capture all the nuances of human perception, especially for complex or highly structured images. Additionally, the method may be sensitive to the choice of low-level features and the specific generative models used, which could limit its generalization to different types of images and distortions.

Further research could explore ways to make the RFIQA method more robust and adaptable, such as by incorporating more advanced generative models or learning the feature extraction and quality assessment components in an end-to-end fashion. Comparisons to other state-of-the-art no-reference quality metrics, as well as studies on the method's interpretability and human-alignment, would also be valuable.

Conclusion

The proposed reference-free image quality assessment method is a significant contribution to the field of image quality analysis. By leveraging simple generative representations to capture key perceptual attributes, the method can effectively assess image quality without the need for a reference image. This approach has the potential to improve a wide range of applications, from image compression and denoising to super-resolution and adversarial defense. While the method has some limitations, the research opens up new avenues for developing robust and adaptable no-reference image quality metrics.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Reference-Free Image Quality Metric for Degradation and Reconstruction Artifacts
Total Score

0

Reference-Free Image Quality Metric for Degradation and Reconstruction Artifacts

Han Cui, Alfredo De Goyeneche, Efrat Shimron, Boyuan Ma, Michael Lustig

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) is essential in various Computer Vision tasks such as image deblurring and super-resolution. However, most IQA methods require reference images, which are not always available. While there are some reference-free IQA metrics, they have limitations in simulating human perception and discerning subtle image quality variations. We hypothesize that the JPEG quality factor is representatives of image quality measurement, and a well-trained neural network can learn to accurately evaluate image quality without requiring a clean reference, as it can recognize image degradation artifacts based on prior knowledge. Thus, we developed a reference-free quality evaluation network, dubbed Quality Factor (QF) Predictor, which does not require any reference. Our QF Predictor is a lightweight, fully convolutional network comprising seven layers. The model is trained in a self-supervised manner: it receives JPEG compressed image patch with a random QF as input, is trained to accurately predict the corresponding QF. We demonstrate the versatility of the model by applying it to various tasks. First, our QF Predictor can generalize to measure the severity of various image artifacts, such as Gaussian Blur and Gaussian noise. Second, we show that the QF Predictor can be trained to predict the undersampling rate of images reconstructed from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data.

Read more

5/6/2024

Adaptive Feature Selection for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Mitigating Semantic Noise Sensitivity
Total Score

0

Adaptive Feature Selection for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Mitigating Semantic Noise Sensitivity

Xudong Li, Timin Gao, Runze Hu, Yan Zhang, Shengchuan Zhang, Xiawu Zheng, Jingyuan Zheng, Yunhang Shen, Ke Li, Yutao Liu, Pingyang Dai, Rongrong Ji

The current state-of-the-art No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) methods typically rely on feature extraction from upstream semantic backbone networks, assuming that all extracted features are relevant. However, we make a key observation that not all features are beneficial, and some may even be harmful, necessitating careful selection. Empirically, we find that many image pairs with small feature spatial distances can have vastly different quality scores, indicating that the extracted features may contain a significant amount of quality-irrelevant noise. To address this issue, we propose a Quality-Aware Feature Matching IQA Metric (QFM-IQM) that employs an adversarial perspective to remove harmful semantic noise features from the upstream task. Specifically, QFM-IQM enhances the semantic noise distinguish capabilities by matching image pairs with similar quality scores but varying semantic features as adversarial semantic noise and adaptively adjusting the upstream task's features by reducing sensitivity to adversarial noise perturbation. Furthermore, we utilize a distillation framework to expand the dataset and improve the model's generalization ability. Our approach achieves superior performance to the state-of-the-art NR-IQA methods on eight standard IQA datasets.

Read more

5/28/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Cross-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment

Zhen Zhang

Automatic perception of image quality is a challenging problem that impacts billions of Internet and social media users daily. To advance research in this field, we propose a no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) method termed Cross-IQA based on vision transformer(ViT) model. The proposed Cross-IQA method can learn image quality features from unlabeled image data. We construct the pretext task of synthesized image reconstruction to unsupervised extract the image quality information based ViT block. The pretrained encoder of Cross-IQA is used to fine-tune a linear regression model for score prediction. Experimental results show that Cross-IQA can achieve state-of-the-art performance in assessing the low-frequency degradation information (e.g., color change, blurring, etc.) of images compared with the classical full-reference IQA and NR-IQA under the same datasets.

Read more

5/8/2024

A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images
Total Score

0

A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images

Anna Breger, Ander Biguri, Malena Sabat'e Landman, Ian Selby, Nicole Amberg, Elisabeth Brunner, Janek Grohl, Sepideh Hatamikia, Clemens Karner, Lipeng Ning, Soren Dittmer, Michael Roberts, AIX-COVNET Collaboration, Carola-Bibiane Schonlieb

Image quality assessment (IQA) is not just indispensable in clinical practice to ensure high standards, but also in the development stage of novel algorithms that operate on medical images with reference data. This paper provides a structured and comprehensive collection of examples where the two most common full reference (FR) image quality measures prove to be unsuitable for the assessment of novel algorithms using different kinds of medical images, including real-world MRI, CT, OCT, X-Ray, digital pathology and photoacoustic imaging data. In particular, the FR-IQA measures PSNR and SSIM are known and tested for working successfully in many natural imaging tasks, but discrepancies in medical scenarios have been noted in the literature. Inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have very different properties than natural images which have not been targeted nor tested in the development of the mentioned measures, and therefore might imply wrong judgement of novel methods for medical images. Therefore, improvement is urgently needed in particular in this era of AI to increase explainability, reproducibility and generalizability in machine learning for medical imaging and beyond. On top of the pitfalls we will provide ideas for future research as well as suggesting guidelines for the usage of FR-IQA measures applied to medical images.

Read more

5/30/2024