Refined Sample Complexity for Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximation
0
🎯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel algorithm for Markov Games (MG), an important model for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL).
- Previous works have resolved the "curse of multi-agents" (where performance drops exponentially with the number of agents), but they either had slower convergence rates or introduced a polynomial dependency on the number of actions.
- This paper refines the AVLPR framework and introduces "action-dependent bonuses" to handle estimation errors, achieving the optimal convergence rate while avoiding the polynomial dependency.
Plain English Explanation
Markov Games (MG) are a way to model scenarios where multiple agents interact and make decisions. This is an important problem in the field of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL).
In the past, it was believed that as the number of agents increases, the performance of MARL algorithms would drop exponentially - a problem known as the "curse of multi-agents." However, recent works have found ways to overcome this curse.
These works resolved the curse, but they had some limitations. Specifically, they either converged more slowly (at a rate of O(T^-1/4)) or had a performance that depended on the number of actions in a way that could be avoided even in single-agent cases.
This paper proposes a new algorithm that addresses these limitations. It refines a previous framework called AVLPR, using a "data-dependent" (i.e., stochastic) way of estimating the sub-optimality gap. This allows the use of a broader range of algorithms.
When applied to MGs with independent linear function approximations, the paper introduces "action-dependent bonuses" to handle occasional large estimation errors. By combining state-of-the-art techniques from single-agent Reinforcement Learning, the paper presents the first algorithm that can tackle the curse of multi-agents, achieve the optimal convergence rate of O(T^-1/2), and avoid the polynomial dependency on the number of actions.
Technical Explanation
This paper builds upon the AVLPR framework proposed by Wang et al. (2023). The key insight is to design a
When specializing the algorithm to Markov Games (MGs) with independent linear function approximations, the paper introduces
By leveraging state-of-the-art techniques from the single-agent Reinforcement Learning literature, such as Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logit Function Approximation, the paper presents the first algorithm that can:
- Tackle the curse of multi-agents, where the algorithmic performance drops exponentially with the number of agents.
- Attain the optimal O(T^-1/2) convergence rate.
- Avoid the polynomial dependency on the number of actions (A_max), which is avoidable even in single-agent cases.
Critical Analysis
The paper addresses an important challenge in the field of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) by proposing a novel algorithm for Markov Games (MGs) that overcomes the "curse of multi-agents." The key strengths of the paper are the data-dependent pessimistic estimation approach and the introduction of action-dependent bonuses to handle estimation errors.
One potential limitation is that the paper focuses on MGs with independent linear function approximations. While this is an important setting, it would be valuable to see how the proposed algorithm performs in more general, non-linear function approximation scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison with other state-of-the-art MARL algorithms beyond the specific theoretical guarantees. It would be helpful to see empirical evaluations on benchmark MARL tasks to better understand the practical implications and tradeoffs of the proposed approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant advance in the field of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) by proposing a novel algorithm for Markov Games (MGs) that can overcome the "curse of multi-agents." The key innovations are the data-dependent pessimistic estimation and the introduction of action-dependent bonuses to handle estimation errors.
By achieving the optimal convergence rate of O(T^-1/2) while avoiding the polynomial dependency on the number of actions, this algorithm paves the way for more efficient and scalable MARL solutions. The insights and techniques developed in this work could have broader implications for the design of multi-agent learning systems, with potential applications in areas like cooperative robotics, autonomous traffic management, and multi-player game AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
0
Refined Sample Complexity for Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximation
Yan Dai, Qiwen Cui, Simon S. Du
Markov Games (MG) is an important model for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). It was long believed that the curse of multi-agents (i.e., the algorithmic performance drops exponentially with the number of agents) is unavoidable until several recent works (Daskalakis et al., 2023; Cui et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023). While these works resolved the curse of multi-agents, when the state spaces are prohibitively large and (linear) function approximations are deployed, they either had a slower convergence rate of $O(T^{-1/4})$ or brought a polynomial dependency on the number of actions $A_{max}$ -- which is avoidable in single-agent cases even when the loss functions can arbitrarily vary with time. This paper first refines the AVLPR framework by Wang et al. (2023), with an insight of designing *data-dependent* (i.e., stochastic) pessimistic estimation of the sub-optimality gap, allowing a broader choice of plug-in algorithms. When specialized to MGs with independent linear function approximations, we propose novel *action-dependent bonuses* to cover occasionally extreme estimation errors. With the help of state-of-the-art techniques from the single-agent RL literature, we give the first algorithm that tackles the curse of multi-agents, attains the optimal $O(T^{-1/2})$ convergence rate, and avoids $text{poly}(A_{max})$ dependency simultaneously.
Read more6/12/2024
👀
0
Independent Policy Mirror Descent for Markov Potential Games: Scaling to Large Number of Players
Pragnya Alatur, Anas Barakat, Niao He
Markov Potential Games (MPGs) form an important sub-class of Markov games, which are a common framework to model multi-agent reinforcement learning problems. In particular, MPGs include as a special case the identical-interest setting where all the agents share the same reward function. Scaling the performance of Nash equilibrium learning algorithms to a large number of agents is crucial for multi-agent systems. To address this important challenge, we focus on the independent learning setting where agents can only have access to their local information to update their own policy. In prior work on MPGs, the iteration complexity for obtaining $epsilon$-Nash regret scales linearly with the number of agents $N$. In this work, we investigate the iteration complexity of an independent policy mirror descent (PMD) algorithm for MPGs. We show that PMD with KL regularization, also known as natural policy gradient, enjoys a better $sqrt{N}$ dependence on the number of agents, improving over PMD with Euclidean regularization and prior work. Furthermore, the iteration complexity is also independent of the sizes of the agents' action spaces.
Read more8/16/2024
🏅
0
Provably Efficient Infinite-Horizon Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation
Woojin Chae, Dabeen Lee
This paper proposes a computationally tractable algorithm for learning infinite-horizon average-reward linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) and linear mixture MDPs under the Bellman optimality condition. While guaranteeing computational efficiency, our algorithm for linear MDPs achieves the best-known regret upper bound of $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}mathrm{sp}(v^*)sqrt{T})$ over $T$ time steps where $mathrm{sp}(v^*)$ is the span of the optimal bias function $v^*$ and $d$ is the dimension of the feature mapping. For linear mixture MDPs, our algorithm attains a regret bound of $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(dcdotmathrm{sp}(v^*)sqrt{T})$. The algorithm applies novel techniques to control the covering number of the value function class and the span of optimistic estimators of the value function, which is of independent interest.
Read more9/25/2024
🤿
0
Improving Sample Efficiency of Model-Free Algorithms for Zero-Sum Markov Games
Songtao Feng, Ming Yin, Yu-Xiang Wang, Jing Yang, Yingbin Liang
The problem of two-player zero-sum Markov games has recently attracted increasing interests in theoretical studies of multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL). In particular, for finite-horizon episodic Markov decision processes (MDPs), it has been shown that model-based algorithms can find an $epsilon$-optimal Nash Equilibrium (NE) with the sample complexity of $O(H^3SAB/epsilon^2)$, which is optimal in the dependence of the horizon $H$ and the number of states $S$ (where $A$ and $B$ denote the number of actions of the two players, respectively). However, none of the existing model-free algorithms can achieve such an optimality. In this work, we propose a model-free stage-based Q-learning algorithm and show that it achieves the same sample complexity as the best model-based algorithm, and hence for the first time demonstrate that model-free algorithms can enjoy the same optimality in the $H$ dependence as model-based algorithms. The main improvement of the dependency on $H$ arises by leveraging the popular variance reduction technique based on the reference-advantage decomposition previously used only for single-agent RL. However, such a technique relies on a critical monotonicity property of the value function, which does not hold in Markov games due to the update of the policy via the coarse correlated equilibrium (CCE) oracle. Thus, to extend such a technique to Markov games, our algorithm features a key novel design of updating the reference value functions as the pair of optimistic and pessimistic value functions whose value difference is the smallest in the history in order to achieve the desired improvement in the sample efficiency.
Read more6/7/2024