Regulating Dark Patterns

Read original: arXiv:2310.00340 - Published 4/3/2024 by Martin Brenncke

🌀

Overview

Dark patterns in online choice architectures are becoming more widespread
These include practices like hidden fees, pre-selected options, and nagging consumers
Regulators are concerned these practices are harming consumers
This paper focuses on the legal response to dark patterns in the European Union
It analyzes EU laws addressing dark patterns and argues they protect consumer autonomy

Plain English Explanation

Online shopping can sometimes feel like a maze, with hidden fees, pre-selected options, and constant nudges to sign up for things we don't really want. These "dark patterns" are design tactics used to steer consumers towards choices that benefit businesses, rather than empowering us to make fully informed decisions.

Regulators around the world are beginning to recognize the substantial harm these practices can cause. This research paper takes a close look at how the European Union is addressing the issue of dark patterns through its laws and regulations. The key idea is that these laws are aimed at protecting consumer autonomy - our ability to make independent choices free from undue influence.

The paper proposes a specific way of understanding autonomous decision-making, rooted in the notion that providing clear information enables consumers to decide for themselves. It then develops a framework for classifying different types of autonomy violations in online choice architectures, such as obscuring important details or using aggressive tactics to push certain options. This taxonomy can help policymakers identify and regulate problematic dark patterns.

The overall goal is to empower consumers to navigate the online world with their interests in mind, rather than being manipulated into choices that primarily benefit businesses. By understanding the legal landscape and principles at play, we can work towards a more transparent and ethical digital marketplace.

Technical Explanation

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of European Union laws addressing the issue of "dark patterns" in online choice architectures. Dark patterns refer to design tactics that steer consumers towards choices that benefit businesses, rather than enabling autonomous decision-making.

The authors first map out the various EU laws that directly or indirectly regulate dark patterns, including consumer protection directives, e-commerce regulations, and laws on unfair commercial practices. They argue that the underlying normative principle in these laws is the protection of consumer autonomy.

To elaborate on this autonomy-based framework, the paper develops a specific conception of autonomous decision-making. This is rooted in the idea that providing consumers with clear, accessible information enables them to make informed choices for themselves.

Building on this foundation, the authors propose a novel taxonomy of six categories of autonomy violations in online choice architectures. These range from obscuring important information and creating "subscription traps" to using aggressive "nagging" tactics and manipulating the presentation of options through "drip pricing."

This taxonomy serves multiple purposes. It uncovers the autonomy-based rationale underlying existing EU regulations. It delineates the boundary between acceptable influence and problematic autonomy violations. And it provides a framework for policymakers to assess and address other emerging forms of dark patterns.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by comprehensively analyzing the EU's legal response to dark patterns through the lens of consumer autonomy. This normative framing is an important counterpoint to more purely economic or behavioral perspectives on the issue.

That said, the authors acknowledge that their conception of autonomous decision-making, centered on information provision, may be a rather narrow view. Real-world consumer decision-making involves a complex interplay of biases, social influences, and contextual factors that go beyond just the availability of information.

Additionally, while the taxonomy of autonomy violations is a useful analytical tool, its application in practice may not always be clear-cut. Distinguishing acceptable "influence" from unacceptable "manipulation" can involve difficult judgment calls, especially as online choice architectures become more sophisticated.

The paper also does not delve into the challenges of enforcement and implementation of dark patterns regulations. Regulators will need effective monitoring and accountability mechanisms to ensure compliance by businesses.

Overall, this research provides a solid foundation for understanding the legal landscape around dark patterns in the EU. However, continued empirical investigation, cross-jurisdictional dialogue, and an evolution of regulatory frameworks will likely be needed to keep pace with the ever-changing digital marketplace.

Conclusion

This paper offers a timely and insightful analysis of how the European Union is addressing the growing problem of "dark patterns" in online choice architectures. By framing the issue through the lens of consumer autonomy, the authors shed light on the underlying principles and normative considerations at play in EU laws and regulations.

The proposed taxonomy of autonomy violations provides a useful framework for policymakers to identify problematic dark patterns and develop more targeted interventions. Empowering consumers to make truly informed decisions, free from undue manipulation, is a crucial step towards a more ethical and transparent digital marketplace.

As online businesses continue to devise new ways of shaping consumer choices, ongoing research, regulatory adaptation, and public awareness will be essential. This paper lays important groundwork for these efforts, and its insights may also have relevance for jurisdictions beyond the European Union.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌀

Regulating Dark Patterns

Martin Brenncke

Dark patterns have become increasingly pervasive in online choice architectures, encompassing practices like subscription traps, hiding information about fees, pre-selecting options by default, nagging, and drip pricing. Regulators around the world have started to express concerns that such practices are causing substantial consumer detriment. This Article focuses on the legal response to dark patterns in the European Union. It provides the first comprehensive mapping of European Union laws expressly addressing dark patterns. The Article argues that these laws protect biased consumers and adopt autonomy as a normative lens to assess dark patterns. Consequently, regulating dark patterns in European Union law means regulating for autonomy. This normative lens is under-researched. This Article addresses this gap in research with two principle contributions. First, it works out a specific conception of autonomous decision-making, rooted in the paradigm that providing consumers with information enables consumers to make an informed decision. Second, the Article offers a novel normative classification for dark patterns in online choice architectures. It develops a taxonomy encompassing six categories of autonomy violations, specifically tailored for the assessment and regulation of dark patterns that exploit consumer behavioral biases. These categories serve multiple purposes. They uncover and make explicit the autonomy violations addressed by existing European Union laws. They delineate the contentious line between acceptable influences on consumer decision-making and autonomy violations that may warrant regulation in online choice architectures. They also provide policymakers in the EU and elsewhere with a framework when deliberating the regulation of other instances of dark patterns.

4/3/2024

🔍

Mapping the Scholarship of Dark Pattern Regulation: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Regulatory Paradigms, and Solutions from an Interdisciplinary Perspective

Weiwei Yi, Zihao Li

Dark patterns, design tricks used on online interfaces to manipulate users decision-making process, have raised public concerns. However, research on regulation of dark pattern remains underdeveloped and scattered, particularly regarding scholars views on the concept, regulatory paradigms, and solutions. Following PRISMA guidelines, this paper systematically reviews the formats and content of regulatory discussions on dark patterns from the interdisciplinary scholarship of Law and Human-Computer Interaction. A total of 65 studies were analysed through content and thematic analysis. This study synthesises the unique trends and characteristics of legal scholarship on dark patterns, identifying five root problems and triple layered harms. It critiques current regulations in terms of legal theories and sectoral legislations, highlighting their inadequacies in addressing dark patterns. The paper also critically examines existing proposed solutions, including paradigmatic shifts in legal doctrines, refinements to existing frameworks, technical design-embedded solutions, and accountability measures for design practices. This research critically discusses the current barriers to effective dark pattern regulations and explores promising regulatory solutions. The difficulty in identifying the normative nature of various forms of dark patterns, in identifying evident and actionable harm, and the expanding scope of dark patterns connotation inherently hinders effective regulation. However, technical design-embedded solutions, accountability frameworks, and practical design guidelines offer potential routes for more proactive regulation, while legal pluralism stands as a promising macro-level change in regulatory paradigms for dark pattern regulation.

7/16/2024

Dark Patterns in the Opt-Out Process and Compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)

Van Hong Tran, Aarushi Mehrotra, Ranya Sharma, Marshini Chetty, Nick Feamster, Jens Frankenreiter, Lior Strahilevitz

To protect consumer privacy, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) mandates that businesses provide consumers with a straightforward way to opt out of the sale and sharing of their personal information. However, the control that businesses enjoy over the opt-out process allows them to impose hurdles on consumers aiming to opt out, including by employing dark patterns. Motivated by the enactment of the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which strengthens the CCPA and explicitly forbids certain dark patterns in the opt-out process, we investigate how dark patterns are used in opt-out processes and assess their compliance with CCPA regulations. Our research reveals that websites employ a variety of dark patterns. Some of these patterns are explicitly prohibited under the CCPA; others evidently take advantage of legal loopholes. Despite the initial efforts to restrict dark patterns by policymakers, there is more work to be done.

9/17/2024

Detecting Deceptive Dark Patterns in E-commerce Platforms

Arya Ramteke, Sankalp Tembhurne, Gunesh Sonawane, Ratnmala N. Bhimanpallewar

Dark patterns are deceptive user interfaces employed by e-commerce websites to manipulate user's behavior in a way that benefits the website, often unethically. This study investigates the detection of such dark patterns. Existing solutions include UIGuard, which uses computer vision and natural language processing, and approaches that categorize dark patterns based on detectability or utilize machine learning models trained on datasets. We propose combining web scraping techniques with fine-tuned BERT language models and generative capabilities to identify dark patterns, including outliers. The approach scrapes textual content, feeds it into the BERT model for detection, and leverages BERT's bidirectional analysis and generation abilities. The study builds upon research on automatically detecting and explaining dark patterns, aiming to raise awareness and protect consumers.

6/5/2024