Mapping the Scholarship of Dark Pattern Regulation: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Regulatory Paradigms, and Solutions from an Interdisciplinary Perspective
0
🔍
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper systematically reviews the current state of regulatory discussions on "dark patterns" - design tricks used in online interfaces to manipulate user decision-making.
- The paper analyzes 65 studies from the fields of Law and Human-Computer Interaction to synthesize the trends, characteristics, and gaps in legal scholarship on dark patterns.
- It identifies five root problems and three layers of harm caused by dark patterns, critiques existing regulations, and examines proposed solutions, including technical design-embedded approaches and shifts in legal frameworks.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at the growing issue of "dark patterns" - sneaky design tactics used on websites and apps to trick people into doing things they don't really want to do. The researchers did a comprehensive review of 65 different studies on this topic from legal and technology research fields.
They found that dark patterns can cause real harm to users in multiple ways, like making it hard to cancel subscriptions or tricking people into sharing more personal information than they intended. However, current laws and regulations often struggle to effectively address these manipulative design practices.
The paper suggests some promising solutions, like developing technical tools to automatically detect dark patterns, and changing the way the law approaches these issues. For example, shifting towards a more proactive, "design-embedded" regulatory approach, rather than just reacting to problems after they occur.
Overall, the research highlights the challenges of tackling dark patterns, but also points to some hopeful paths forward to better protect people from these deceptive online experiences.
Technical Explanation
The paper follows a PRISMA systematic review methodology to analyze the current state of legal and HCI scholarship on the regulation of dark patterns. Through a content and thematic analysis of 65 relevant studies, the authors synthesize the unique trends and characteristics of this interdisciplinary research area.
The analysis identifies five root problems underlying the regulation of dark patterns, including the difficulty in defining their normative nature and establishing evident, actionable harm. It also outlines a three-layered framework for understanding the different types of harms caused by dark patterns.
The paper then critically examines the inadequacies of current legal theories and sectoral legislations in addressing dark patterns. It also analyzes existing proposed solutions, such as technical design-embedded approaches, refinements to existing frameworks, and accountability measures for design practices.
Critical Analysis
While the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current regulatory landscape around dark patterns, it acknowledges the inherent challenges in effectively addressing this issue. The difficulty in clearly identifying the normative nature of various dark pattern practices and establishing evident, actionable harm poses a significant barrier to effective regulation.
Additionally, the ever-expanding scope of what constitutes a "dark pattern" further complicates the regulatory efforts. The paper suggests that a shift towards more proactive, design-embedded solutions and accountability frameworks may offer more promising avenues for regulation, compared to the limitations of traditional legal approaches.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical implementation details or potential unintended consequences of some of the proposed solutions. Further research may be needed to fully evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of these regulatory approaches.
Conclusion
This systematic review offers a valuable synthesis of the current state of legal and HCI scholarship on the regulation of dark patterns. The paper highlights the complex nature of the problem, the inadequacies of existing regulations, and the need for more holistic, multifaceted solutions.
While the challenges in addressing dark patterns are substantial, the research points to promising directions, such as technical design-embedded approaches and shifts in legal paradigms, that could lead to more effective protection of users from these deceptive online experiences. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation will be crucial in developing comprehensive regulatory frameworks to address the evolving landscape of dark patterns.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔍
0
Mapping the Scholarship of Dark Pattern Regulation: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Regulatory Paradigms, and Solutions from an Interdisciplinary Perspective
Weiwei Yi, Zihao Li
Dark patterns, design tricks used on online interfaces to manipulate users decision-making process, have raised public concerns. However, research on regulation of dark pattern remains underdeveloped and scattered, particularly regarding scholars views on the concept, regulatory paradigms, and solutions. Following PRISMA guidelines, this paper systematically reviews the formats and content of regulatory discussions on dark patterns from the interdisciplinary scholarship of Law and Human-Computer Interaction. A total of 65 studies were analysed through content and thematic analysis. This study synthesises the unique trends and characteristics of legal scholarship on dark patterns, identifying five root problems and triple layered harms. It critiques current regulations in terms of legal theories and sectoral legislations, highlighting their inadequacies in addressing dark patterns. The paper also critically examines existing proposed solutions, including paradigmatic shifts in legal doctrines, refinements to existing frameworks, technical design-embedded solutions, and accountability measures for design practices. This research critically discusses the current barriers to effective dark pattern regulations and explores promising regulatory solutions. The difficulty in identifying the normative nature of various forms of dark patterns, in identifying evident and actionable harm, and the expanding scope of dark patterns connotation inherently hinders effective regulation. However, technical design-embedded solutions, accountability frameworks, and practical design guidelines offer potential routes for more proactive regulation, while legal pluralism stands as a promising macro-level change in regulatory paradigms for dark pattern regulation.
Read more7/16/2024
🌀
0
Regulating Dark Patterns
Martin Brenncke
Dark patterns have become increasingly pervasive in online choice architectures, encompassing practices like subscription traps, hiding information about fees, pre-selecting options by default, nagging, and drip pricing. Regulators around the world have started to express concerns that such practices are causing substantial consumer detriment. This Article focuses on the legal response to dark patterns in the European Union. It provides the first comprehensive mapping of European Union laws expressly addressing dark patterns. The Article argues that these laws protect biased consumers and adopt autonomy as a normative lens to assess dark patterns. Consequently, regulating dark patterns in European Union law means regulating for autonomy. This normative lens is under-researched. This Article addresses this gap in research with two principle contributions. First, it works out a specific conception of autonomous decision-making, rooted in the paradigm that providing consumers with information enables consumers to make an informed decision. Second, the Article offers a novel normative classification for dark patterns in online choice architectures. It develops a taxonomy encompassing six categories of autonomy violations, specifically tailored for the assessment and regulation of dark patterns that exploit consumer behavioral biases. These categories serve multiple purposes. They uncover and make explicit the autonomy violations addressed by existing European Union laws. They delineate the contentious line between acceptable influences on consumer decision-making and autonomy violations that may warrant regulation in online choice architectures. They also provide policymakers in the EU and elsewhere with a framework when deliberating the regulation of other instances of dark patterns.
Read more4/3/2024
🌀
0
Theorizing Deception: A Scoping Review of Theory in Research on Dark Patterns and Deceptive Design
Weichen Joe Chang, Katie Seaborn, Andrew A. Adams
The issue of dark patterns and deceptive designs (DPs) in everyday interfaces and interactions continues to grow. DPs are manipulative and malicious elements within user interfaces that deceive users into making unintended choices. In parallel, research on DPs has significantly increased over the past two decades. As the field has matured, epistemological gaps have also become a salient and pressing concern. In this scoping review, we assessed the academic work so far -- 51 papers between 2014 to 2023 -- to identify the state of theory in DP research. We identified the key theories employed, examined how these theories have been referenced, and call for enhancing the incorporation of theory into DP research. We also propose broad theoretical foundations to establish a comprehensive and solid base for contextualizing and informing future DP research from a variety of theoretical scopes and lenses.
Read more5/16/2024
🌀
0
Hell is Paved with Good Intentions: The Intricate Relationship Between Cognitive Biases and Dark Patterns
Thomas Mildner, Albert Inkoom, Rainer Malaka, Jasmin Niess
Throughout the past decade, research in HCI has identified numerous instances of dark patterns in digital interfaces. These efforts have led to a well-fostered typology describing harmful strategies users struggle to navigate. However, an in-depth understanding of the underlying mechanisms that deceive, coerce, or manipulate users is missing. We explore the interplay between cognitive biases and dark patterns to address this gap. To that end, we conducted four focus groups with experts (N=15) in psychology and dark pattern scholarship, inquiring how they conceptualise the relation between cognitive biases and dark patterns. Based on our results, we constructed the Relationship Model of Cognitive Biases and Dark Patterns which illustrates how cognitive bias and deceptive design patterns relate and identifies opportune moments for ethical reconsideration and user protection mechanisms. Our insights contribute to the current discourse by emphasising ethical design decisions and their implications in the field of HCI.
Read more5/14/2024