Regulatory Requirements Engineering in Large Enterprises: An Interview Study on the European Accessibility Act

Overview

• Interviews with professionals in large enterprises to understand regulatory requirements engineering for the European Accessibility Act
• Insights into challenges, practices, and future directions related to accessibility regulations
• Implications for requirements engineering in the context of compliance with accessibility laws

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a study that interviewed professionals working in large companies to understand how they handle regulatory requirements, specifically related to the European Accessibility Act. The European Accessibility Act is a law that requires digital products and services to be accessible to people with disabilities.

The researchers wanted to learn about the challenges, practices, and future directions that companies face when trying to comply with this accessibility regulation. By talking to people directly involved in this process, they were able to get insights into the real-world implementation of these regulatory requirements.

The findings from this study provide valuable information for requirements engineering in the context of compliance with accessibility laws. It sheds light on the practical considerations and obstacles that companies must navigate when incorporating accessibility requirements into their product development cycles.

Technical Explanation

The study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 16 professionals from large enterprises in Europe. The participants held roles such as Chief Accessibility Officer, Accessibility Consultant, and Requirements Engineer.

The interviews explored topics related to the challenges of incorporating accessibility requirements, the practices used to manage these requirements, and the future directions for improving regulatory requirements engineering in this domain. Some key findings include:

• Challenges: Lack of accessibility expertise, difficulty translating legal requirements into technical specifications, and tensions between accessibility and other business priorities.
• Practices: Using accessibility checklists, conducting user testing with people with disabilities, and integrating accessibility requirements into existing requirements engineering processes.
• Future Directions: Improving cross-functional collaboration, developing more comprehensive accessibility standards, and leveraging AI-based tools for automated accessibility testing.

The results provide insights into the practical realities of implementing accessibility regulations within large, complex organizations. The researchers suggest that this knowledge can inform the development of more effective requirements engineering approaches for addressing regulatory compliance in the context of digital accessibility.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-executed study of regulatory requirements engineering for the European Accessibility Act in large enterprises. The researchers acknowledge several limitations, such as the relatively small sample size and the potential for bias in self-reported data from interview participants.

Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the potential role of AI-based tools for automated user story generation or the cultural influences on requirements engineering activities, which could be valuable areas for further research.

There is also an opportunity to investigate the maturity of requirements engineering practices for AI-based systems and how they may differ from traditional software development, as accessibility regulations increasingly intersect with AI-powered technologies.

Overall, the study offers a valuable contribution to the understanding of regulatory requirements engineering and highlights the need for continued research and innovation in this area to address the evolving challenges faced by large enterprises.

Conclusion

This paper provides important insights into the practical challenges, current practices, and future directions for regulatory requirements engineering in the context of the European Accessibility Act. The findings highlight the complexities that large organizations face when trying to comply with accessibility regulations and the need for more effective requirements engineering approaches to address these challenges.

The study's insights can inform the development of responsible AI artifacts that better support accessibility requirements, as well as the broader field of requirements engineering for compliance with evolving digital regulations. Continued research and collaboration between industry, academia, and policymakers will be crucial to advancing this important area of study.