Cultural influence on RE activities: An extended analysis of state of the art

Overview

• Examines the influence of cultural factors on requirements engineering (RE) activities
• Presents a systematic literature review and mapping study to understand the state of research in this area
• Proposes a framework for analyzing the impact of cultural dimensions on RE practices

Plain English Explanation

This research paper explores how cultural factors can influence the activities involved in requirements engineering (RE). RE is the process of understanding and documenting the needs and constraints for a software system. The researchers conducted a systematic review of existing literature to understand the current state of research on this topic.

The paper discusses the Hofstede model, a well-known framework for analyzing cultural dimensions such as individualism, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance. The researchers used this model as a lens to examine how cultural factors can impact various RE practices, such as requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation.

The findings suggest that cultural dimensions can play a significant role in shaping stakeholder expectations, communication patterns, and decision-making processes during RE activities. For example, in cultures with high power distance, there may be a greater emphasis on hierarchical and formal communication channels, which could influence how requirements are gathered and prioritized.

By providing a comprehensive overview of the existing research and a conceptual framework for analyzing cultural influences, this paper offers valuable insights for software development teams that operate in diverse cultural contexts. It highlights the importance of considering cultural factors when planning and executing RE activities to ensure successful software projects.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a systematic literature review and mapping study to investigate the influence of cultural factors on requirements engineering (RE) activities. The researchers followed a rigorous methodology to search, select, and analyze relevant studies from various databases, including IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Scopus.

The analysis focused on understanding how the different dimensions of the Hofstede model, such as individualism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity, can impact various RE practices, including requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation.

The study identified several key findings:

1. Cultural factors can shape stakeholder expectations, communication patterns, and decision-making processes during RE activities.
2. Power distance and uncertainty avoidance were the cultural dimensions most frequently discussed in the literature, suggesting their significant influence on RE practices.
3. Individualism and collectivism were found to impact the involvement and participation of stakeholders in RE activities.
4. Masculinity and femininity dimensions influenced the negotiation and conflict resolution strategies employed during requirements gathering and analysis.

The researchers proposed a conceptual framework that synthesizes the identified cultural influences on RE activities, providing a structured way for software development teams to consider cultural factors when planning and executing RE processes.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the existing research on the cultural influence on RE activities. The researchers have thoroughly explored the relevant literature and used a well-established cultural framework (Hofstede model) to structure their analysis, which adds rigor and credibility to the study.

However, the study is limited to the cultural dimensions proposed by the Hofstede model, which may not capture the full complexity of cultural influences. Additional cultural frameworks or perspectives could be explored in future research to provide a more holistic understanding of this topic.

Furthermore, the paper primarily focuses on identifying and categorizing the cultural influences on RE activities, but does not delve deeply into specific strategies or best practices for navigating these cultural considerations in practice. Providing more practical guidance or case studies could further enhance the usefulness of this research for software development teams.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential challenges or limitations in implementing culturally-aware RE practices, such as the difficulty of quantifying cultural factors or the potential for cultural stereotyping. Acknowledging and discussing these issues could help readers approach the topic with a more nuanced and critical perspective.

Conclusion

This research paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of how cultural factors can influence requirements engineering activities. By conducting a systematic review and mapping study, the researchers have synthesized the existing knowledge in this domain and proposed a conceptual framework for analyzing cultural influences on RE practices.

The findings highlight the importance of considering cultural dimensions, such as power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and individualism, when planning and executing RE processes in diverse organizational and global settings. This knowledge can help software development teams adapt their RE practices to better suit the cultural contexts in which they operate, ultimately leading to more successful software projects.

Future research could build upon this work by exploring additional cultural frameworks, investigating more specific strategies for culturally-aware RE, and addressing the practical challenges and limitations in implementing these approaches. Nonetheless, this paper serves as a solid foundation for understanding the interplay between culture and requirements engineering, and its insights can be leveraged to improve the effectiveness and inclusiveness of software development practices.