Reinforcement Learning as an Improvement Heuristic for Real-World Production Scheduling

Read original: arXiv:2409.11933 - Published 9/19/2024 by Arthur Muller, Lukas Vollenkemper
Total Score

0

Reinforcement Learning as an Improvement Heuristic for Real-World Production Scheduling

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using reinforcement learning as a heuristic to improve real-world production scheduling.
  • The research was supported by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Industry, Climate Action and Energy of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
  • The paper investigates the potential for reinforcement learning to enhance decision-making in complex production environments.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers investigate using a type of artificial intelligence called reinforcement learning to improve how companies schedule their production processes. Scheduling production can be very complicated, with many factors to consider like available resources, due dates, and costs. The researchers wanted to see if reinforcement learning could help make better scheduling decisions.

Reinforcement learning is a way for AI systems to learn by trial and error, getting rewarded for good decisions and penalized for bad ones. The researchers trained a reinforcement learning model on historical production data, teaching it to recognize patterns and make scheduling choices that would optimize things like on-time delivery and minimize costs. They then tested the model on real-world production scenarios to see how it performed compared to traditional scheduling methods.

The key insight is that by using reinforcement learning as a "heuristic" or rule-of-thumb, companies can leverage the power of AI to make more informed, dynamic decisions about their production schedules. This could lead to significant improvements in efficiency, responsiveness, and profitability for manufacturing businesses.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for using reinforcement learning as an optimization heuristic for real-world production scheduling problems. The authors developed a reinforcement learning-based scheduling agent that learns to make effective scheduling decisions through iterative interaction with a simulated production environment.

The agent's learning process involves observing the current state of production (e.g. machine utilization, inventory levels, order backlog) and taking actions (e.g. assigning jobs to machines, adjusting production plans) to maximize a reward signal that encodes production objectives like on-time delivery and cost minimization. By repeatedly executing this cycle of observation, action, and reward, the agent develops a policy for making scheduling decisions that improve over time.

The researchers tested their reinforcement learning approach on a real-world case study from the furniture industry, comparing its performance to traditional heuristic-based scheduling methods. Their results showed that the reinforcement learning agent was able to generate schedules that outperformed the benchmark methods in terms of key performance indicators like tardiness and inventory holding costs.

Critical Analysis

The main strength of this research is its demonstration of how reinforcement learning can be leveraged as a practical optimization tool for complex, real-world production scheduling problems. By framing scheduling as a sequential decision-making task, the authors were able to harness the power of reinforcement learning to learn effective scheduling policies from data.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and avenues for future work. For example, the authors note that their approach relies on a detailed simulation model of the production environment, which may not always be available in practice. There is also the question of how well the learned scheduling policies would generalize to vastly different production settings.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the "black box" nature of the reinforcement learning agent's decision-making process. Understanding the underlying logic and reasoning behind the agent's scheduling choices could be important for building trust and adoption in industrial settings.

Further research could explore ways to make the reinforcement learning approach more transparent and interpretable, perhaps by incorporating elements of explainable AI. Integrating the reinforcement learning scheduler with other production planning and control systems could also be an interesting area for future work.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the potential of using reinforcement learning as a heuristic to improve real-world production scheduling. By training an AI agent to learn effective scheduling policies through interaction with a simulated production environment, the researchers were able to generate schedules that outperformed traditional methods.

The findings suggest that reinforcement learning could be a valuable tool for manufacturing companies looking to optimize their production processes and respond more dynamically to changing market conditions. As the technology continues to mature, we may see more widespread adoption of reinforcement learning-based scheduling systems in industrial settings.

However, there are still challenges to address, such as improving the interpretability of the learned scheduling policies and ensuring the approach can generalize to diverse production environments. Overall, this research represents an important step towards leveraging the power of AI to enhance real-world decision-making in the manufacturing sector.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Reinforcement Learning as an Improvement Heuristic for Real-World Production Scheduling
Total Score

0

New!Reinforcement Learning as an Improvement Heuristic for Real-World Production Scheduling

Arthur Muller, Lukas Vollenkemper

The integration of Reinforcement Learning (RL) with heuristic methods is an emerging trend for solving optimization problems, which leverages RL's ability to learn from the data generated during the search process. One promising approach is to train an RL agent as an improvement heuristic, starting with a suboptimal solution that is iteratively improved by applying small changes. We apply this approach to a real-world multiobjective production scheduling problem. Our approach utilizes a network architecture that includes Transformer encoding to learn the relationships between jobs. Afterwards, a probability matrix is generated from which pairs of jobs are sampled and then swapped to improve the solution. We benchmarked our approach against other heuristics using real data from our industry partner, demonstrating its superior performance.

Read more

9/19/2024

Optimizing Job Shop Scheduling in the Furniture Industry: A Reinforcement Learning Approach Considering Machine Setup, Batch Variability, and Intralogistics
Total Score

0

New!Optimizing Job Shop Scheduling in the Furniture Industry: A Reinforcement Learning Approach Considering Machine Setup, Batch Variability, and Intralogistics

Malte Schneevogt, Karsten Binninger, Noah Klarmann

This paper explores the potential application of Deep Reinforcement Learning in the furniture industry. To offer a broad product portfolio, most furniture manufacturers are organized as a job shop, which ultimately results in the Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP). The JSSP is addressed with a focus on extending traditional models to better represent the complexities of real-world production environments. Existing approaches frequently fail to consider critical factors such as machine setup times or varying batch sizes. A concept for a model is proposed that provides a higher level of information detail to enhance scheduling accuracy and efficiency. The concept introduces the integration of DRL for production planning, particularly suited to batch production industries such as the furniture industry. The model extends traditional approaches to JSSPs by including job volumes, buffer management, transportation times, and machine setup times. This enables more precise forecasting and analysis of production flows and processes, accommodating the variability and complexity inherent in real-world manufacturing processes. The RL agent learns to optimize scheduling decisions. It operates within a discrete action space, making decisions based on detailed observations. A reward function guides the agent's decision-making process, thereby promoting efficient scheduling and meeting production deadlines. Two integration strategies for implementing the RL agent are discussed: episodic planning, which is suitable for low-automation environments, and continuous planning, which is ideal for highly automated plants. While episodic planning can be employed as a standalone solution, the continuous planning approach necessitates the integration of the agent with ERP and Manufacturing Execution Systems. This integration enables real-time adjustments to production schedules based on dynamic changes.

Read more

9/19/2024

Beyond Training: Optimizing Reinforcement Learning Based Job Shop Scheduling Through Adaptive Action Sampling
Total Score

0

Beyond Training: Optimizing Reinforcement Learning Based Job Shop Scheduling Through Adaptive Action Sampling

Constantin Waubert de Puiseau, Christian Dorpelkus, Jannik Peters, Hasan Tercan, Tobias Meisen

Learned construction heuristics for scheduling problems have become increasingly competitive with established solvers and heuristics in recent years. In particular, significant improvements have been observed in solution approaches using deep reinforcement learning (DRL). While much attention has been paid to the design of network architectures and training algorithms to achieve state-of-the-art results, little research has investigated the optimal use of trained DRL agents during inference. Our work is based on the hypothesis that, similar to search algorithms, the utilization of trained DRL agents should be dependent on the acceptable computational budget. We propose a simple yet effective parameterization, called $delta$-sampling that manipulates the trained action vector to bias agent behavior towards exploration or exploitation during solution construction. By following this approach, we can achieve a more comprehensive coverage of the search space while still generating an acceptable number of solutions. In addition, we propose an algorithm for obtaining the optimal parameterization for such a given number of solutions and any given trained agent. Experiments extending existing training protocols for job shop scheduling problems with our inference method validate our hypothesis and result in the expected improvements of the generated solutions.

Read more

6/12/2024

Reinforcement Learning-driven Data-intensive Workflow Scheduling for Volunteer Edge-Cloud
Total Score

0

Reinforcement Learning-driven Data-intensive Workflow Scheduling for Volunteer Edge-Cloud

Motahare Mounesan, Mauro Lemus, Hemanth Yeddulapalli, Prasad Calyam, Saptarshi Debroy

In recent times, Volunteer Edge-Cloud (VEC) has gained traction as a cost-effective, community computing paradigm to support data-intensive scientific workflows. However, due to the highly distributed and heterogeneous nature of VEC resources, centralized workflow task scheduling remains a challenge. In this paper, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-driven data-intensive scientific workflow scheduling approach that takes into consideration: i) workflow requirements, ii) VEC resources' preference on workflows, and iii) diverse VEC resource policies, to ensure robust resource allocation. We formulate the long-term average performance optimization problem as a Markov Decision Process, which is solved using an event-based Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic RL approach. Our extensive simulations and testbed implementations demonstrate our approach's benefits over popular baseline strategies in terms of workflow requirement satisfaction, VEC preference satisfaction, and available VEC resource utilization.

Read more

7/2/2024