Beyond Training: Optimizing Reinforcement Learning Based Job Shop Scheduling Through Adaptive Action Sampling
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores using reinforcement learning to optimize job shop scheduling, a complex problem in manufacturing and logistics.
- The researchers propose an adaptive action sampling approach to improve the efficiency and performance of reinforcement learning-based job shop scheduling algorithms.
- The method aims to dynamically adjust the exploration-exploitation trade-off during the learning process to find better solutions faster.
Plain English Explanation
In manufacturing and logistics, job shop scheduling is a challenging problem. It involves deciding the order and timing of different tasks or "jobs" on various machines to optimize factors like throughput, efficiency, and cost.
The researchers in this paper looked at using reinforcement learning - a type of machine learning where an agent learns by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties - to tackle job shop scheduling. Reinforcement learning can be powerful for complex optimization problems, but it can also be slow to converge on good solutions.
To address this, the researchers developed an "adaptive action sampling" approach. The idea is to dynamically adjust how much the reinforcement learning agent explores new actions versus exploiting what it has already learned. Early on, more exploration helps the agent discover a wider range of good solutions. Later, more exploitation of the best-known solutions can help refine and improve them.
By adapting this exploration-exploitation balance over time, the researchers found their reinforcement learning-based job shop scheduling algorithm could converge to high-performing solutions more efficiently. This could save time and costs in real-world manufacturing and logistics applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an adaptive reinforcement learning approach for job shop scheduling optimization. The key innovation is an "adaptive action sampling" mechanism that dynamically adjusts the exploration-exploitation trade-off during the learning process.
Specifically, the researchers use a deep reinforcement learning agent to learn a scheduling policy. At each decision point, the agent selects an action (i.e., which job to schedule next) based on the current state of the job shop. A reward function evaluates the quality of the resulting schedule.
To improve convergence speed and solution quality, the adaptive action sampling method varies the probability of selecting exploratory versus exploitative actions over time. Early on, more exploration helps the agent discover a wider range of potentially good solutions. As learning progresses, more exploitation of the best-known solutions allows the agent to refine and improve them.
The researchers evaluate their approach on benchmark job shop scheduling problems. Compared to standard reinforcement learning methods, their adaptive action sampling technique demonstrates faster convergence to higher-performing schedules. This indicates the potential for reinforcement learning to be a viable approach for real-world job shop scheduling, especially when combined with techniques like adaptive action sampling to improve sample efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed study that rigorously evaluates the proposed adaptive action sampling approach against standard reinforcement learning baselines. The results demonstrate clear performance improvements, suggesting the adaptive method is a valuable contribution to the field.
That said, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations or potential downsides of the approach. For example, it is not clear how the method would scale to extremely large or complex job shop scheduling problems, or how sensitive it is to the choice of hyperparameters and reward function design.
Additionally, the paper does not compare the reinforcement learning-based approach to other optimization techniques like genetic algorithms or queueing theory. While reinforcement learning shows promise, understanding how it performs relative to other established methods would provide a more complete picture.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating how adaptive action sampling can improve the efficiency of reinforcement learning for job shop scheduling. However, further research is needed to fully characterize the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate applications of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper explores using reinforcement learning to optimize job shop scheduling, a complex problem in manufacturing and logistics. The researchers propose an adaptive action sampling method that dynamically adjusts the exploration-exploitation trade-off during the learning process.
By adapting this balance over time, the reinforcement learning agent is able to converge to high-performing scheduling solutions more efficiently compared to standard reinforcement learning approaches. This could lead to significant time and cost savings in real-world applications.
The paper provides a rigorous evaluation of the proposed method, but also highlights the need for further research to better understand its limitations and how it compares to other optimization techniques. Overall, this work represents an important step forward in applying reinforcement learning to challenging scheduling and logistics problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Beyond Training: Optimizing Reinforcement Learning Based Job Shop Scheduling Through Adaptive Action Sampling
Constantin Waubert de Puiseau, Christian Dorpelkus, Jannik Peters, Hasan Tercan, Tobias Meisen
Learned construction heuristics for scheduling problems have become increasingly competitive with established solvers and heuristics in recent years. In particular, significant improvements have been observed in solution approaches using deep reinforcement learning (DRL). While much attention has been paid to the design of network architectures and training algorithms to achieve state-of-the-art results, little research has investigated the optimal use of trained DRL agents during inference. Our work is based on the hypothesis that, similar to search algorithms, the utilization of trained DRL agents should be dependent on the acceptable computational budget. We propose a simple yet effective parameterization, called $delta$-sampling that manipulates the trained action vector to bias agent behavior towards exploration or exploitation during solution construction. By following this approach, we can achieve a more comprehensive coverage of the search space while still generating an acceptable number of solutions. In addition, we propose an algorithm for obtaining the optimal parameterization for such a given number of solutions and any given trained agent. Experiments extending existing training protocols for job shop scheduling problems with our inference method validate our hypothesis and result in the expected improvements of the generated solutions.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Production Scheduling via Explainable AI
Daniel Fischer, Hannah M. Husener, Felix Grumbach, Lukas Vollenkemper, Arthur Muller, Pascal Reusch
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a frequently employed technique to solve scheduling problems. Although DRL agents ace at delivering viable results in short computing times, their reasoning remains opaque. We conduct a case study where we systematically apply two explainable AI (xAI) frameworks, namely SHAP (DeepSHAP) and Captum (Input x Gradient), to describe the reasoning behind scheduling decisions of a specialized DRL agent in a flow production. We find that methods in the xAI literature lack falsifiability and consistent terminology, do not adequately consider domain-knowledge, the target audience or real-world scenarios, and typically provide simple input-output explanations rather than causal interpretations. To resolve this issue, we introduce a hypotheses-based workflow. This approach enables us to inspect whether explanations align with domain knowledge and match the reward hypotheses of the agent. We furthermore tackle the challenge of communicating these insights to third parties by tailoring hypotheses to the target audience, which can serve as interpretations of the agent's behavior after verification. Our proposed workflow emphasizes the repeated verification of explanations and may be applicable to various DRL-based scheduling use cases.
Read more9/2/2024
🤿
0
State-Novelty Guided Action Persistence in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Jianshu Hu, Paul Weng, Yutong Ban
While a powerful and promising approach, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) still suffers from sample inefficiency, which can be notably improved by resorting to more sophisticated techniques to address the exploration-exploitation dilemma. One such technique relies on action persistence (i.e., repeating an action over multiple steps). However, previous work exploiting action persistence either applies a fixed strategy or learns additional value functions (or policy) for selecting the repetition number. In this paper, we propose a novel method to dynamically adjust the action persistence based on the current exploration status of the state space. In such a way, our method does not require training of additional value functions or policy. Moreover, the use of a smooth scheduling of the repeat probability allows a more effective balance between exploration and exploitation. Furthermore, our method can be seamlessly integrated into various basic exploration strategies to incorporate temporal persistence. Finally, extensive experiments on different DMControl tasks demonstrate that our state-novelty guided action persistence method significantly improves the sample efficiency.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Learning Interpretable Scheduling Algorithms for Data Processing Clusters
Zhibo Hu (Hye-Young), Chen Wang (Hye-Young), Helen (Hye-Young), Paik, Yanfeng Shu, Liming Zhu
Workloads in data processing clusters are often represented in the form of DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) jobs. Scheduling DAG jobs is challenging. Simple heuristic scheduling algorithms are often adopted in practice in production data centres. There is much room for scheduling performance optimisation for cost saving. Recently, reinforcement learning approaches (like decima) have been attempted to optimise DAG job scheduling and demonstrate clear performance gain in comparison to traditional algorithms. However, reinforcement learning (RL) approaches face their own problems in real-world deployment. In particular, their black-box decision making processes and generalizability in unseen workloads may add a non-trivial burden to the cluster administrators. Moreover, adapting RL models on unseen workloads often requires significant amount of training data, which leaves edge cases run in a sub-optimal mode. To fill the gap, we propose a new method to distill a simple scheduling policy based on observations of the behaviours of a complex deep learning model. The simple model not only provides interpretability of scheduling decisions, but also adaptive to edge cases easily through tuning. We show that our method achieves high fidelity to the decisions made by deep learning models and outperforms these models when additional heuristics are taken into account.
Read more5/30/2024