Relationships are Complicated! An Analysis of Relationships Between Datasets on the Web
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explains the complexities of relationships between datasets on the web
- Analyzes how datasets are connected and how these connections can be understood
- Provides insights into the challenges of managing and navigating the web of dataset relationships
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the intricate relationships that exist between datasets on the web. Datasets, which contain organized collections of information, are often connected to one another in complex ways. These connections can be difficult to understand and manage, as datasets may be related through various means, such as sharing common elements, being derived from the same sources, or covering overlapping topics.
The research aims to shed light on these dataset relationships, examining how they can be identified, categorized, and utilized to enhance the discovery and use of relevant data. By understanding the nuances of these relationships, the authors hope to help researchers, data scientists, and the broader web community navigate the web of dataset connections more effectively.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an analysis of the relationships between datasets on the web, focusing on how these connections can be characterized and leveraged. The researchers explore various types of dataset relationships, such as those based on shared metadata, semantic similarities, and usage patterns.
Through a combination of data mining techniques and qualitative analysis, the authors investigate the prevalence and nature of these relationships, as well as the challenges in accurately identifying and representing them. The findings provide insights into the complexity of the web of dataset connections and the importance of developing robust methods for managing and navigating this landscape.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the inherent complexity of dataset relationships and the difficulties in accurately capturing and representing them. The authors note that the heterogeneity of datasets, the lack of standardized metadata, and the evolving nature of dataset connections pose significant challenges in developing comprehensive and reliable models of these relationships.
While the research offers valuable insights into the characteristics and patterns of dataset relationships, the authors caution that the findings may be limited by the specific datasets and methods used in the analysis. Further research is needed to validate the generalizability of the results and to explore additional perspectives on the management and utilization of dataset connections.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the intricate web of relationships that exist between datasets on the web, underscoring the need for more robust approaches to understanding, managing, and leveraging these connections. The findings provide a foundation for future work in dataset discovery, integration, and analysis, ultimately aiming to enhance the accessibility and utility of the vast and interconnected web of data resources.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Relationships are Complicated! An Analysis of Relationships Between Datasets on the Web
Kate Lin, Tarfah Alrashed, Natasha Noy
The Web today has millions of datasets, and the number of datasets continues to grow at a rapid pace. These datasets are not standalone entities; rather, they are intricately connected through complex relationships. Semantic relationships between datasets provide critical insights for research and decision-making processes. In this paper, we study dataset relationships from the perspective of users who discover, use, and share datasets on the Web: what relationships are important for different tasks? What contextual information might users want to know? We first present a comprehensive taxonomy of relationships between datasets on the Web and map these relationships to user tasks performed during dataset discovery. We develop a series of methods to identify these relationships and compare their performance on a large corpus of datasets generated from Web pages with schema.org markup. We demonstrate that machine-learning based methods that use dataset metadata achieve multi-class classification accuracy of 90%. Finally, we highlight gaps in available semantic markup for datasets and discuss how incorporating comprehensive semantics can facilitate the identification of dataset relationships. By providing a comprehensive overview of dataset relationships at scale, this paper sets a benchmark for future research.
Read more8/28/2024
0
Toward FAIR Semantic Publishing of Research Dataset Metadata in the Open Research Knowledge Graph
Raia Abu Ahmad, Jennifer D'Souza, Matthaus Zloch, Wolfgang Otto, Georg Rehm, Allard Oelen, Stefan Dietze, Soren Auer
Search engines these days can serve datasets as search results. Datasets get picked up by search technologies based on structured descriptions on their official web pages, informed by metadata ontologies such as the Dataset content type of schema.org. Despite this promotion of the content type dataset as a first-class citizen of search results, a vast proportion of datasets, particularly research datasets, still need to be made discoverable and, therefore, largely remain unused. This is due to the sheer volume of datasets released every day and the inability of metadata to reflect a dataset's content and context accurately. This work seeks to improve this situation for a specific class of datasets, namely research datasets, which are the result of research endeavors and are accompanied by a scholarly publication. We propose the ORKG-Dataset content type, a specialized branch of the Open Research Knowledge Graoh (ORKG) platform, which provides descriptive information and a semantic model for research datasets, integrating them with their accompanying scholarly publications. This work aims to establish a standardized framework for recording and reporting research datasets within the ORKG-Dataset content type. This, in turn, increases research dataset transparency on the web for their improved discoverability and applied use. In this paper, we present a proposal -- the minimum FAIR, comparable, semantic description of research datasets in terms of salient properties of their supporting publication. We design a specific application of the ORKG-Dataset semantic model based on 40 diverse research datasets on scientific information extraction.
Read more4/15/2024
📈
0
SemRel2024: A Collection of Semantic Textual Relatedness Datasets for 13 Languages
Nedjma Ousidhoum, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Mohamed Abdalla, Idris Abdulmumin, Ibrahim Said Ahmad, Sanchit Ahuja, Alham Fikri Aji, Vladimir Araujo, Abinew Ali Ayele, Pavan Baswani, Meriem Beloucif, Chris Biemann, Sofia Bourhim, Christine De Kock, Genet Shanko Dekebo, Oumaima Hourrane, Gopichand Kanumolu, Lokesh Madasu, Samuel Rutunda, Manish Shrivastava, Thamar Solorio, Nirmal Surange, Hailegnaw Getaneh Tilaye, Krishnapriya Vishnubhotla, Genta Winata, Seid Muhie Yimam, Saif M. Mohammad
Exploring and quantifying semantic relatedness is central to representing language and holds significant implications across various NLP tasks. While earlier NLP research primarily focused on semantic similarity, often within the English language context, we instead investigate the broader phenomenon of semantic relatedness. In this paper, we present textit{SemRel}, a new semantic relatedness dataset collection annotated by native speakers across 13 languages: textit{Afrikaans, Algerian Arabic, Amharic, English, Hausa, Hindi, Indonesian, Kinyarwanda, Marathi, Moroccan Arabic, Modern Standard Arabic, Spanish,} and textit{Telugu}. These languages originate from five distinct language families and are predominantly spoken in Africa and Asia -- regions characterised by a relatively limited availability of NLP resources. Each instance in the SemRel datasets is a sentence pair associated with a score that represents the degree of semantic textual relatedness between the two sentences. The scores are obtained using a comparative annotation framework. We describe the data collection and annotation processes, challenges when building the datasets, baseline experiments, and their impact and utility in NLP.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Understanding Inter-Concept Relationships in Concept-Based Models
Naveen Raman, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja Jamnik
Concept-based explainability methods provide insight into deep learning systems by constructing explanations using human-understandable concepts. While the literature on human reasoning demonstrates that we exploit relationships between concepts when solving tasks, it is unclear whether concept-based methods incorporate the rich structure of inter-concept relationships. We analyse the concept representations learnt by concept-based models to understand whether these models correctly capture inter-concept relationships. First, we empirically demonstrate that state-of-the-art concept-based models produce representations that lack stability and robustness, and such methods fail to capture inter-concept relationships. Then, we develop a novel algorithm which leverages inter-concept relationships to improve concept intervention accuracy, demonstrating how correctly capturing inter-concept relationships can improve downstream tasks.
Read more5/29/2024