Understanding Inter-Concept Relationships in Concept-Based Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
This paper investigates how machine learning models represent and understand the relationships between different concepts. The researchers explore concept-based models, which aim to explain model decisions by mapping neural activations to high-level semantic concepts. The key focus is on understanding how these models capture the connections and interactions between various concepts.
Plain English Explanation
Concept-based machine learning models try to bridge the gap between the inner workings of a model and human understanding. Rather than just outputting a prediction, these models aim to explain their reasoning by mapping their internal representations to human-understandable concepts.
For example, a model classifying images of animals might associate certain neural activations with concepts like "fur", "paws", and "tail". The relationships between these concepts - how they interact and influence each other - is the focus of this research.
The researchers wanted to better understand how concept-based models capture the nuanced ways these concepts are related. Do they simply treat concepts as independent, or do they model more complex interactions? Exploring this can shed light on the strengths and limitations of these interpretable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the relationships between concepts learned by concept-based machine learning models. The researchers analyze the structure of the concept activation space, looking at how concepts are organized and how they interact with each other.
They propose several methods to quantify different aspects of these inter-concept relationships, such as concept similarity, concept overlap, and concept dependency. These metrics allow them to identify patterns in how the models represent and reason about different concepts.
Through experiments on various concept-based models and datasets, the researchers find that these models do capture meaningful relationships between concepts, beyond just treating them as independent. The structure of the concept space reflects semantic and functional connections between the concepts.
However, they also identify limitations, such as a tendency for models to overemphasize certain types of relationships, like hierarchical or causal relationships. The paper discusses how these findings can inform the design of more robust and faithful self-explaining neural architectures.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the inner workings of concept-based models and how they represent the relationships between different concepts. By quantifying various aspects of these inter-concept relationships, the researchers offer a more nuanced understanding of the strengths and limitations of these interpretable AI systems.
One potential area for further research is exploring how the identified relationship patterns vary across different domains and tasks. The paper focuses on a limited set of experiments, so it would be interesting to see how the findings generalize to a wider range of concept-based models and applications.
Additionally, the paper could delve deeper into the implications of the observed relationship biases, such as the tendency to overemphasize hierarchical or causal connections. Understanding the causes and potential consequences of these biases could inform the development of more balanced and comprehensive concept-based models.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important step towards unpacking the inner workings of concept-based machine learning models. By analyzing the structure and relationships within the concept activation space, the researchers shed light on how these models represent and reason about high-level semantic concepts.
The findings suggest that concept-based models do capture meaningful connections between concepts, but also highlight certain biases and limitations in how they model these relationships. This knowledge can inform the design of more robust and faithful self-explaining neural architectures, ultimately advancing the field of interpretable AI and helping to build more transparent and trustworthy machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding Inter-Concept Relationships in Concept-Based Models
Naveen Raman, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja Jamnik
Concept-based explainability methods provide insight into deep learning systems by constructing explanations using human-understandable concepts. While the literature on human reasoning demonstrates that we exploit relationships between concepts when solving tasks, it is unclear whether concept-based methods incorporate the rich structure of inter-concept relationships. We analyse the concept representations learnt by concept-based models to understand whether these models correctly capture inter-concept relationships. First, we empirically demonstrate that state-of-the-art concept-based models produce representations that lack stability and robustness, and such methods fail to capture inter-concept relationships. Then, we develop a novel algorithm which leverages inter-concept relationships to improve concept intervention accuracy, demonstrating how correctly capturing inter-concept relationships can improve downstream tasks.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Abstraction Alignment: Comparing Model and Human Conceptual Relationships
Angie Boggust, Hyemin Bang, Hendrik Strobelt, Arvind Satyanarayan
Abstraction -- the process of generalizing specific examples into broad reusable patterns -- is central to how people efficiently process and store information and apply their knowledge to new data. Promisingly, research has shown that ML models learn representations that span levels of abstraction, from specific concepts like bolo tie and car tire to more general concepts like CEO and model. However, existing techniques analyze these representations in isolation, treating learned concepts as independent artifacts rather than an interconnected web of abstraction. As a result, although we can identify the concepts a model uses to produce its output, it is difficult to assess if it has learned a human-aligned abstraction of the concepts that will generalize to new data. To address this gap, we introduce abstraction alignment, a methodology to measure the agreement between a model's learned abstraction and the expected human abstraction. We quantify abstraction alignment by comparing model outputs against a human abstraction graph, such as linguistic relationships or medical disease hierarchies. In evaluation tasks interpreting image models, benchmarking language models, and analyzing medical datasets, abstraction alignment provides a deeper understanding of model behavior and dataset content, differentiating errors based on their agreement with human knowledge, expanding the verbosity of current model quality metrics, and revealing ways to improve existing human abstractions.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Locating and Extracting Relational Concepts in Large Language Models
Zijian Wang, Britney White, Chang Xu
Relational concepts are indeed foundational to the structure of knowledge representation, as they facilitate the association between various entity concepts, allowing us to express and comprehend complex world knowledge. By expressing relational concepts in natural language prompts, people can effortlessly interact with large language models (LLMs) and recall desired factual knowledge. However, the process of knowledge recall lacks interpretability, and representations of relational concepts within LLMs remain unknown to us. In this paper, we identify hidden states that can express entity and relational concepts through causal mediation analysis in fact recall processes. Our finding reveals that at the last token position of the input prompt, there are hidden states that solely express the causal effects of relational concepts. Based on this finding, we assume that these hidden states can be treated as relational representations and we can successfully extract them from LLMs. The experimental results demonstrate high credibility of the relational representations: they can be flexibly transplanted into other fact recall processes, and can also be used as robust entity connectors. Moreover, we also show that the relational representations exhibit significant potential for controllable fact recall through relation rewriting.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Knowledge graphs for empirical concept retrieval
Lenka Tv{e}tkov'a, Teresa Karen Scheidt, Maria Mandrup Fogh, Ellen Marie Gaunby J{o}rgensen, Finn {AA}rup Nielsen, Lars Kai Hansen
Concept-based explainable AI is promising as a tool to improve the understanding of complex models at the premises of a given user, viz. as a tool for personalized explainability. An important class of concept-based explainability methods is constructed with empirically defined concepts, indirectly defined through a set of positive and negative examples, as in the TCAV approach (Kim et al., 2018). While it is appealing to the user to avoid formal definitions of concepts and their operationalization, it can be challenging to establish relevant concept datasets. Here, we address this challenge using general knowledge graphs (such as, e.g., Wikidata or WordNet) for comprehensive concept definition and present a workflow for user-driven data collection in both text and image domains. The concepts derived from knowledge graphs are defined interactively, providing an opportunity for personalization and ensuring that the concepts reflect the user's intentions. We test the retrieved concept datasets on two concept-based explainability methods, namely concept activation vectors (CAVs) and concept activation regions (CARs) (Crabbe and van der Schaar, 2022). We show that CAVs and CARs based on these empirical concept datasets provide robust and accurate explanations. Importantly, we also find good alignment between the models' representations of concepts and the structure of knowledge graphs, i.e., human representations. This supports our conclusion that knowledge graph-based concepts are relevant for XAI.
Read more4/11/2024