On the Relevance of Byzantine Robust Optimization Against Data Poisoning

Read original: arXiv:2405.00491 - Published 5/2/2024 by Sadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Rafael Pinot

🛠️

Overview

Machine learning (ML) has seen great success, relying on large datasets from various sources processed on distributed computing networks.
However, this raises concerns about robustness against data poisoning and faulty workers in critical domains like healthcare and autonomous driving.
The problem of Byzantine ML formalizes these robustness issues, considering a distributed ML environment where workers can deviate arbitrarily from the algorithm.
While theoretically important, the practical significance of this "stronger" threat model is unclear, as realistic faults often result in workers' local datasets being poisoned.
The paper argues that the "weaker" data poisoning threat model is more reasonable and shows that Byzantine-robust schemes are optimal even in this case.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning has become incredibly powerful, fueled by the abundance of data collected from many different sources and processed across large networks of computers. However, as machine learning is increasingly used in critical domains like healthcare and self-driving cars, ensuring the robustness of these systems against potential issues is crucial.

One key concern is the risk of "data poisoning," where the data used to train the machine learning models is intentionally corrupted or tampered with. Another issue is the possibility of "faulty workers," which are the individual computers in the distributed network that may not be functioning properly.

The problem of "Byzantine machine learning" formalizes these robustness challenges by considering a scenario where the workers in the distributed network can behave in arbitrary, unpredictable ways that deviate from the intended algorithm. While this "stronger" threat model has been extensively studied from a theoretical perspective, its practical relevance for addressing realistic faults, where workers' local datasets are the primary target of attacks, remains unclear.

The researchers argue that the "weaker" data poisoning threat model, where only the workers' local datasets are poisoned, is more reasonable and likely to occur in practice. Surprisingly, they show that the solutions designed to handle the stronger Byzantine threat model are actually optimal for addressing this weaker data poisoning scenario as well.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the relationship between the "stronger" Byzantine ML threat model and the "weaker" data poisoning model, where workers' local datasets are the target of attack.

The researchers prove that Byzantine-robust schemes, designed to handle the arbitrary deviations of workers in the Byzantine model, are in fact optimal solutions even under the data poisoning threat model. This is a significant result, as it suggests that the theoretically-motivated Byzantine ML solutions have practical relevance for addressing realistic faults in distributed machine learning systems.

Furthermore, the paper introduces a more general data poisoning model, where some workers have "fully-poisonous" local datasets (entirely corruptible) and others have "partially-poisonous" local datasets (only a fraction is corruptible). The authors demonstrate that Byzantine-robust schemes continue to yield optimal solutions against both these forms of data poisoning, and that the "fully-poisonous" case is more harmful when workers have heterogeneous local data.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling analysis of the practical relevance of Byzantine ML solutions, bridging the gap between the theoretical and real-world concerns in distributed machine learning systems.

One potential limitation is the assumption of a binary distinction between "fully-poisonous" and "partially-poisonous" local datasets. In reality, the degree of data poisoning may exist on a spectrum, and a more nuanced model could provide additional insights.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the optimality of Byzantine-robust schemes, but does not explore the computational complexity or implementation challenges of deploying such solutions in real-world scenarios. Further research may be needed to address the practical trade-offs and engineering considerations.

It would also be valuable to explore the implications of these findings for specific applications, such as [link to "attacking-byzantine-robust-aggregation-high-dimensions"] high-dimensional settings or [link to "privacy-preserving-aggregation-decentralized-learning-byzantine-robustness"] privacy-preserving decentralized learning, to better understand the broader impact of this work.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution by demonstrating the practical relevance of Byzantine-robust machine learning schemes, even in the "weaker" data poisoning threat model that is more likely to occur in realistic distributed ML environments.

The insights provided in this work have important implications for the design and deployment of robust machine learning systems, especially in safety-critical domains. By understanding the optimality of Byzantine-robust solutions, researchers and practitioners can focus their efforts on developing effective defenses against data poisoning attacks, ultimately enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of AI-powered applications.

As machine learning continues to permeate various aspects of our lives, this research highlights the importance of considering the robustness and security of these systems, paving the way for more resilient and trustworthy AI technologies that can be safely deployed in the real world.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

On the Relevance of Byzantine Robust Optimization Against Data Poisoning

Sadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Rafael Pinot

The success of machine learning (ML) has been intimately linked with the availability of large amounts of data, typically collected from heterogeneous sources and processed on vast networks of computing devices (also called {em workers}). Beyond accuracy, the use of ML in critical domains such as healthcare and autonomous driving calls for robustness against {em data poisoning}and some {em faulty workers}. The problem of {em Byzantine ML} formalizes these robustness issues by considering a distributed ML environment in which workers (storing a portion of the global dataset) can deviate arbitrarily from the prescribed algorithm. Although the problem has attracted a lot of attention from a theoretical point of view, its practical importance for addressing realistic faults (where the behavior of any worker is locally constrained) remains unclear. It has been argued that the seemingly weaker threat model where only workers' local datasets get poisoned is more reasonable. We prove that, while tolerating a wider range of faulty behaviors, Byzantine ML yields solutions that are, in a precise sense, optimal even under the weaker data poisoning threat model. Then, we study a generic data poisoning model wherein some workers have {em fully-poisonous local data}, i.e., their datasets are entirely corruptible, and the remainders have {em partially-poisonous local data}, i.e., only a fraction of their local datasets is corruptible. We prove that Byzantine-robust schemes yield optimal solutions against both these forms of data poisoning, and that the former is more harmful when workers have {em heterogeneous} local data.

5/2/2024

🎯

Byzantine Robustness and Partial Participation Can Be Achieved at Once: Just Clip Gradient Differences

Grigory Malinovsky, Peter Richt'arik, Samuel Horv'ath, Eduard Gorbunov

Distributed learning has emerged as a leading paradigm for training large machine learning models. However, in real-world scenarios, participants may be unreliable or malicious, posing a significant challenge to the integrity and accuracy of the trained models. Byzantine fault tolerance mechanisms have been proposed to address these issues, but they often assume full participation from all clients, which is not always practical due to the unavailability of some clients or communication constraints. In our work, we propose the first distributed method with client sampling and provable tolerance to Byzantine workers. The key idea behind the developed method is the use of gradient clipping to control stochastic gradient differences in recursive variance reduction. This allows us to bound the potential harm caused by Byzantine workers, even during iterations when all sampled clients are Byzantine. Furthermore, we incorporate communication compression into the method to enhance communication efficiency. Under general assumptions, we prove convergence rates for the proposed method that match the existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) theoretical results. We also propose a heuristic on adjusting any Byzantine-robust method to a partial participation scenario via clipping.

6/10/2024

BadSampler: Harnessing the Power of Catastrophic Forgetting to Poison Byzantine-robust Federated Learning

Yi Liu, Cong Wang, Xingliang Yuan

Federated Learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks, wherein compromised clients manipulate the global model by modifying local datasets or sending manipulated model updates. Experienced defenders can readily detect and mitigate the poisoning effects of malicious behaviors using Byzantine-robust aggregation rules. However, the exploration of poisoning attacks in scenarios where such behaviors are absent remains largely unexplored for Byzantine-robust FL. This paper addresses the challenging problem of poisoning Byzantine-robust FL by introducing catastrophic forgetting. To fill this gap, we first formally define generalization error and establish its connection to catastrophic forgetting, paving the way for the development of a clean-label data poisoning attack named BadSampler. This attack leverages only clean-label data (i.e., without poisoned data) to poison Byzantine-robust FL and requires the adversary to selectively sample training data with high loss to feed model training and maximize the model's generalization error. We formulate the attack as an optimization problem and present two elegant adversarial sampling strategies, Top-$kappa$ sampling, and meta-sampling, to approximately solve it. Additionally, our formal error upper bound and time complexity analysis demonstrate that our design can preserve attack utility with high efficiency. Extensive evaluations on two real-world datasets illustrate the effectiveness and performance of our proposed attacks.

6/19/2024

Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning in Gradient-Based Training

Philip Sosnin, Mark N. Muller, Maximilian Baader, Calvin Tsay, Matthew Wicker

Modern machine learning pipelines leverage large amounts of public data, making it infeasible to guarantee data quality and leaving models open to poisoning and backdoor attacks. However, provably bounding model behavior under such attacks remains an open problem. In this work, we address this challenge and develop the first framework providing provable guarantees on the behavior of models trained with potentially manipulated data. In particular, our framework certifies robustness against untargeted and targeted poisoning as well as backdoor attacks for both input and label manipulations. Our method leverages convex relaxations to over-approximate the set of all possible parameter updates for a given poisoning threat model, allowing us to bound the set of all reachable parameters for any gradient-based learning algorithm. Given this set of parameters, we provide bounds on worst-case behavior, including model performance and backdoor success rate. We demonstrate our approach on multiple real-world datasets from applications including energy consumption, medical imaging, and autonomous driving.

6/11/2024