Renaming in distributed certification

Read original: arXiv:2409.15404 - Published 9/25/2024 by Nicolas Bousquet, Louis Esperet, Laurent Feuilloley, S'ebastien Zeitoun
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses renaming in distributed certification, which is a process of assigning unique identifiers to entities in a decentralized system.
  • It presents theorems and definitions related to renaming in the context of distributed certification.
  • The paper explores the theoretical foundations and limitations of renaming in this setting.

Plain English Explanation

In a decentralized system, entities like people or devices need to be assigned unique names or identifiers so they can be recognized and communicated with. This process is called renaming. The paper examines the challenges and theoretical limits of renaming in the context of distributed certification, which is a way of verifying the identities of entities in a decentralized network without a central authority.

The paper introduces models and definitions that formally describe the renaming problem in distributed certification. It then presents renaming theorems that outline the capabilities and limitations of renaming in this setting. These theorems provide a deeper understanding of the fundamental constraints and tradeoffs involved in assigning unique names to entities in a decentralized system.

By exploring the theoretical underpinnings of renaming, this research helps inform the design of more robust and secure distributed systems, where entities can be reliably identified without relying on a central point of control.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by defining the models and terminology used to describe the renaming problem in distributed certification. It introduces the concept of a renaming function, which is a way of assigning unique identifiers to entities in a decentralized network.

The core of the paper focuses on presenting renaming theorems that characterize the capabilities and limitations of renaming in this context. These theorems establish bounds on the number of unique identifiers that can be assigned, the amount of information required to perform the renaming, and the complexity of the renaming process.

For example, one theorem shows that the number of unique identifiers that can be assigned is limited by the number of entities in the system. Another theorem demonstrates that renaming requires entities to have some prior knowledge about the system, such as the total number of entities.

By deriving these theoretical results, the paper provides a deeper understanding of the fundamental challenges and tradeoffs involved in renaming within distributed certification systems. This knowledge can inform the design of more efficient and secure decentralized architectures that rely on reliable entity identification.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of renaming in distributed certification, but it does not discuss any practical applications or implementation details. While the theorems and definitions presented are important for establishing the theoretical foundations, the paper could be strengthened by including more discussion of how these insights could be applied to real-world distributed systems.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues or caveats that may arise in the practical deployment of renaming mechanisms. For example, it does not consider the impact of malicious actors or faulty entities, which could complicate the renaming process and introduce security vulnerabilities.

Further research could explore the implications of these theoretical results in the context of specific distributed certification use cases, such as decentralized identity management or secure IoT networks. Investigating the interplay between renaming and other distributed system properties, such as fault tolerance and scalability, could also yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This paper presents a formal analysis of renaming in the context of distributed certification, a critical process for enabling reliable entity identification in decentralized systems. The renaming theorems and models introduced provide a solid theoretical foundation for understanding the capabilities and limitations of renaming in this setting.

By exploring the fundamental constraints and trade-offs involved in assigning unique identifiers to entities, this research can inform the design of more robust and secure distributed architectures. The insights gained can help developers build decentralized systems where entities can be reliably recognized and communicated with, without relying on a central point of control.

While the paper focuses on the theoretical aspects, future work could explore the practical implications and applications of these findings, as well as address potential issues and extensions to the renaming problem in distributed certification.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Renaming in distributed certification

Nicolas Bousquet, Louis Esperet, Laurent Feuilloley, S'ebastien Zeitoun

Local certification is the area of distributed network computing asking the following question: How to certify to the nodes of a network that a global property holds, if they are limited to a local verification? In this area, it is often essential to have identifiers, that is, unique integers assigned to the nodes. In this short paper, we show how to reduce the range of the identifiers, in three different settings. More precisely, we show how to rename identifiers in the classical local certification setting, when we can (resp. cannot) choose the new identifiers, and we show how a global certificate can help to encode very compactly a new identifier assignment that is not injective in general, but still useful. We conclude with a number of applications of these three results.

Read more

9/25/2024

Decreasing verification radius in local certification
Total Score

0

Decreasing verification radius in local certification

Laurent Feuilloley, Jan Janouv{s}ek, Jan Maty'av{s} Kv{r}iv{s}v{t}an, Josef Erik Sedl'av{c}ek

This paper deals with local certification, specifically locally checkable proofs: given a graph property, the task is to certify whether a graph satisfies the property. The verification of this certification needs to be done locally without the knowledge of the whole graph. More precisely, a distributed algorithm, called a verifier, is executed on each vertex. The verifier observes the local neighborhood up to a constant distance and either accepts or rejects. We examine the trade-off between the visibility radius and the size of certificates. We describe a procedure that decreases the radius by encoding the neighbourhood of each vertex into its certificate. We also provide a corresponding lower bound on the required certificate size increase, showing that such an approach is close to optimal.

Read more

8/21/2024

Local certification of geometric graph classes
Total Score

0

Local certification of geometric graph classes

Oscar Defrain, Louis Esperet, Aur'elie Lagoutte, Pat Morin, Jean-Florent Raymond

The goal of local certification is to locally convince the vertices of a graph $G$ that $G$ satisfies a given property. A prover assigns short certificates to the vertices of the graph, then the vertices are allowed to check their certificates and the certificates of their neighbors, and based only on this local view, they must decide whether $G$ satisfies the given property. If the graph indeed satisfies the property, all vertices must accept the instance, and otherwise at least one vertex must reject the instance (for any possible assignment of certificates). The goal is to minimize the size of the certificates. In this paper we study the local certification of geometric and topological graph classes. While it is known that in $n$-vertex graphs, planarity can be certified locally with certificates of size $O(log n)$, we show that several closely related graph classes require certificates of size $Omega(n)$. This includes penny graphs, unit-distance graphs, (induced) subgraphs of the square grid, 1-planar graphs, and unit-square graphs. These bounds are tight up to a constant factor and give the first known examples of hereditary (and even monotone) graph classes for which the certificates must have linear size. For unit-disk graphs we obtain a lower bound of $Omega(n^{1-delta})$ for any $delta>0$ on the size of the certificates, and an upper bound of $O(n log n)$. The lower bounds are obtained by proving rigidity properties of the considered graphs, which might be of independent interest.

Read more

5/8/2024

Decentralized Credential Status Management: A Paradigm Shift in Digital Trust
Total Score

0

Decentralized Credential Status Management: A Paradigm Shift in Digital Trust

Patrick Herbke, Thomas Cory, Mauro Migliardi

Public key infrastructures are essential for Internet security, ensuring robust certificate management and revocation mechanisms. The transition from centralized to decentralized systems presents challenges such as trust distribution and privacy-preserving credential management. The transition from centralized to decentralized systems is motivated by addressing the single points of failure inherent in centralized systems and leveraging decentralized technologies' transparency and resilience. This paper explores the evolution of certificate status management from centralized to decentralized frameworks, focusing on blockchain technology and advanced cryptography. We provide a taxonomy of the challenges of centralized systems and discuss opportunities provided by existing decentralized technologies. Our findings reveal that, although blockchain technologies enhance security and trust distribution, they represent a bottleneck for parallel computation and face inefficiencies in cryptographic computations. For this reason, we propose a framework of decentralized technology components that addresses such shortcomings to advance the paradigm shift toward decentralized credential status management.

Read more

9/23/2024