Local certification of geometric graph classes
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the concept of local certification for geometric graph classes, which is a way to efficiently verify properties of graph structures using only local information.
- The researchers investigate the complexity of locally certifying various geometric graph properties, such as Hamiltonian property testing, online locality, and elimination distance to bounded degree planar graphs.
- The paper provides both positive and negative results, including tight lower bounds for local certification of certain graph properties.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a concept called "local certification" for geometric graph classes. Geometric graphs are a type of graph where the nodes represent points in a geometric space, and the edges represent connections between those points.
The idea behind local certification is that you can verify certain properties of a graph by only looking at a small, local part of the graph, rather than having to examine the entire graph. This can be much more efficient, especially for large graphs.
The researchers explore how complex it is to locally certify different types of geometric graph properties. For example, they look at Hamiltonian property testing, which is about verifying whether a graph has a special kind of path that visits every node exactly once. They also investigate online locality and elimination distance to bounded degree planar graphs.
The paper presents both positive and negative results, meaning it shows some properties that can be efficiently locally certified, as well as some properties that have tight lower bounds – meaning there are limits on how efficiently they can be locally certified.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the complexity of locally certifying various geometric graph classes. Local certification is a way to efficiently verify properties of a graph by only examining a small, local part of the graph, rather than the entire structure.
The researchers consider several geometric graph properties, including Hamiltonian property testing, online locality, and elimination distance to bounded degree planar graphs. They provide both positive and negative results, demonstrating the complexities involved in locally certifying these properties.
For example, the paper presents tight lower bounds for the local certification of certain graph properties, indicating fundamental limitations in the efficiency of local certification for those properties.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes valuable contributions to the understanding of local certification for geometric graph classes, but it also highlights some of the challenges and limitations of this approach.
One potential issue raised in the paper is the difficulty of locally certifying certain graph properties, such as those related to Hamiltonian paths and elimination distance. The tight lower bounds presented suggest that there are fundamental limits to the efficiency of local certification for these properties.
Additionally, the paper focuses on specific geometric graph classes, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. It would be interesting to see further research exploring the local certification of a wider range of graph structures and properties.
Overall, this paper provides important insights into the complexities of local certification and sets the stage for future work in this area. Continued research in this direction could lead to more efficient and scalable methods for verifying graph properties, with potential applications in fields such as network analysis, logistics, and beyond.
Conclusion
This paper explores the concept of local certification for geometric graph classes, which allows for the efficient verification of graph properties by examining only a small, local part of the graph. The researchers investigate the complexities involved in locally certifying various geometric graph properties, including Hamiltonian property testing, online locality, and elimination distance to bounded degree planar graphs.
The paper presents both positive and negative results, demonstrating the nuances and limitations of local certification. The tight lower bounds highlighted in the research suggest that there are fundamental challenges in efficiently locally certifying certain graph properties.
Overall, this work contributes to our understanding of the complexities involved in local certification and sets the stage for further research in this area, which could have important implications for the analysis and verification of large-scale graph structures in various domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Local certification of geometric graph classes
Oscar Defrain, Louis Esperet, Aur'elie Lagoutte, Pat Morin, Jean-Florent Raymond
The goal of local certification is to locally convince the vertices of a graph $G$ that $G$ satisfies a given property. A prover assigns short certificates to the vertices of the graph, then the vertices are allowed to check their certificates and the certificates of their neighbors, and based only on this local view, they must decide whether $G$ satisfies the given property. If the graph indeed satisfies the property, all vertices must accept the instance, and otherwise at least one vertex must reject the instance (for any possible assignment of certificates). The goal is to minimize the size of the certificates. In this paper we study the local certification of geometric and topological graph classes. While it is known that in $n$-vertex graphs, planarity can be certified locally with certificates of size $O(log n)$, we show that several closely related graph classes require certificates of size $Omega(n)$. This includes penny graphs, unit-distance graphs, (induced) subgraphs of the square grid, 1-planar graphs, and unit-square graphs. These bounds are tight up to a constant factor and give the first known examples of hereditary (and even monotone) graph classes for which the certificates must have linear size. For unit-disk graphs we obtain a lower bound of $Omega(n^{1-delta})$ for any $delta>0$ on the size of the certificates, and an upper bound of $O(n log n)$. The lower bounds are obtained by proving rigidity properties of the considered graphs, which might be of independent interest.
Read more5/8/2024
0
Decreasing verification radius in local certification
Laurent Feuilloley, Jan Janouv{s}ek, Jan Maty'av{s} Kv{r}iv{s}v{t}an, Josef Erik Sedl'av{c}ek
This paper deals with local certification, specifically locally checkable proofs: given a graph property, the task is to certify whether a graph satisfies the property. The verification of this certification needs to be done locally without the knowledge of the whole graph. More precisely, a distributed algorithm, called a verifier, is executed on each vertex. The verifier observes the local neighborhood up to a constant distance and either accepts or rejects. We examine the trade-off between the visibility radius and the size of certificates. We describe a procedure that decreases the radius by encoding the neighbourhood of each vertex into its certificate. We also provide a corresponding lower bound on the required certificate size increase, showing that such an approach is close to optimal.
Read more8/21/2024
📉
0
Renaming in distributed certification
Nicolas Bousquet, Louis Esperet, Laurent Feuilloley, S'ebastien Zeitoun
Local certification is the area of distributed network computing asking the following question: How to certify to the nodes of a network that a global property holds, if they are limited to a local verification? In this area, it is often essential to have identifiers, that is, unique integers assigned to the nodes. In this short paper, we show how to reduce the range of the identifiers, in three different settings. More precisely, we show how to rename identifiers in the classical local certification setting, when we can (resp. cannot) choose the new identifiers, and we show how a global certificate can help to encode very compactly a new identifier assignment that is not injective in general, but still useful. We conclude with a number of applications of these three results.
Read more9/25/2024
🔗
0
Low-Distortion Clustering in Bounded Growth Graphs
Yi-Jun Chang, Varsha Dani, Thomas P. Hayes
The well-known clustering algorithm of Miller, Peng, and Xu (SPAA 2013) is useful for many applications, including low-diameter decomposition and low-energy distributed algorithms. One nice property of their clustering, shown in previous work by Chang, Dani, Hayes, and Pettie (PODC 2020), is that distances in the cluster graph are rescaled versions of distances in the original graph, up to an $O(log n)$ distortion factor and rounding issues. Minimizing this distortion factor is important for efficiency in computing the clustering, as well as in further applications, once the clustering has been constructed. We prove that there exist graphs for which an $Omega((log n)^{1/3})$ distortion factor is necessary for any clustering. We also consider a class of nice graphs which we call uniformly bounded independence graphs. These include, for example, paths, lattice graphs, and dense unit disk graphs. For these graphs, we prove that clusterings of constant distortion always exist, and moreover, we give an efficient distributed algorithm to construct them. Our clustering algorithm is based on Voronoi cells centered at the vertices of a maximal independent set in a suitable power graph. Applications of our new clustering include low-energy simulation of distributed algorithms in the LOCAL, CONGEST, and RADIO-CONGEST models, as well as efficient approximate solutions to distributed combinatorial optimization problems. We complement these results with matching or nearly matching lower bounds.
Read more9/9/2024