Replicability in High Dimensional Statistics

Read original: arXiv:2406.02628 - Published 6/6/2024 by Max Hopkins, Russell Impagliazzo, Daniel Kane, Sihan Liu, Christopher Ye
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the issue of replicability in high-dimensional statistics, which is a critical concern in many fields of research, particularly in the era of big data and complex models.
  • The authors investigate the computational and statistical challenges associated with achieving replicable results in high-dimensional settings, and propose strategies for addressing these challenges.

Plain English Explanation

In scientific research, it's important that studies can be replicated by other researchers to verify the findings. This is especially challenging in fields that deal with large, complex datasets and sophisticated statistical models, such as machine learning and data science.

The authors of this paper <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/computational-landscape-replicable-learning">explore the computational and statistical barriers to achieving replicable results in high-dimensional settings</a>. High-dimensional data refers to datasets with a large number of variables or features, which can make it difficult to draw reliable conclusions.

Some of the key challenges the authors address include:

  • The instability of high-dimensional models, which can be sensitive to small changes in the data or the model parameters
  • The computational resources required to train and validate these complex models, which can make it difficult to reproduce the exact same results
  • The potential for overfitting, where a model performs well on the training data but fails to generalize to new, unseen data

To address these challenges, the authors propose several strategies, such as <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/replicable-learning-large-margin-halfspaces">using more robust learning algorithms</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robustness-implies-privacy-statistical-estimation">incorporating measures of replicability into the model evaluation process</a>. They also discuss the importance of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/integrating-measures-replicability-into-scholarly-search-challenges">integrating measures of replicability into scholarly search and discovery tools</a>, to help researchers identify and build upon reliable, replicable research.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the importance of replicability in high-dimensional statistics, where the complexity of the data and models can make it challenging to reproduce research findings. The authors discuss how high-dimensional settings can lead to issues such as model instability, computational constraints, and the risk of overfitting.

To address these challenges, the authors propose several strategies. First, they explore the use of more robust learning algorithms, such as <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/replicable-learning-large-margin-halfspaces">large-margin halfspaces</a>, which can help improve the stability and generalizability of the models. They also discuss the importance of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robustness-implies-privacy-statistical-estimation">incorporating measures of replicability into the model evaluation process</a>, to ensure that the reported results are reliable and can be replicated by other researchers.

Additionally, the authors address the need for <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/integrating-measures-replicability-into-scholarly-search-challenges">integrating measures of replicability into scholarly search and discovery tools</a>. This would help researchers identify and build upon high-quality, replicable research, rather than relying on studies that may be difficult to reproduce.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations and avenues for further research. For example, they note that the proposed strategies may not fully address all the challenges associated with replicability in high-dimensional settings, and that additional work is needed to develop more comprehensive solutions.

One potential concern is the reliance on specific learning algorithms, such as large-margin halfspaces, which may not be suitable for all types of high-dimensional data and research questions. It would be valuable to explore the performance of these strategies across a wider range of high-dimensional problems and datasets.

Additionally, the authors do not delve deeply into the practical implementation challenges of integrating replicability measures into scholarly search and discovery tools. Further research may be needed to understand the technical, financial, and organizational barriers to implementing such a system, as well as the potential impact on the research community.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the critical importance of replicability in high-dimensional statistics and proposes several strategies to address the associated computational and statistical challenges. By focusing on the development of more robust learning algorithms, the incorporation of replicability measures into model evaluation, and the integration of these measures into scholarly search and discovery tools, the authors aim to improve the reliability and reproducibility of research in high-dimensional settings.

The insights and recommendations provided in this paper have the potential to significantly impact the way research is conducted and evaluated, particularly in fields that rely heavily on complex, high-dimensional data and models. Ultimately, this work contributes to the ongoing efforts to enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of scientific research in the era of big data and sophisticated statistical techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Replicability in High Dimensional Statistics

Max Hopkins, Russell Impagliazzo, Daniel Kane, Sihan Liu, Christopher Ye

The replicability crisis is a major issue across nearly all areas of empirical science, calling for the formal study of replicability in statistics. Motivated in this context, [Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorrell STOC 2022] introduced the notion of replicable learning algorithms, and gave basic procedures for $1$-dimensional tasks including statistical queries. In this work, we study the computational and statistical cost of replicability for several fundamental high dimensional statistical tasks, including multi-hypothesis testing and mean estimation. Our main contribution establishes a computational and statistical equivalence between optimal replicable algorithms and high dimensional isoperimetric tilings. As a consequence, we obtain matching sample complexity upper and lower bounds for replicable mean estimation of distributions with bounded covariance, resolving an open problem of [Bun, Gaboardi, Hopkins, Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, Sivakumar, and Sorrell, STOC2023] and for the $N$-Coin Problem, resolving a problem of [Karbasi, Velegkas, Yang, and Zhou, NeurIPS2023] up to log factors. While our equivalence is computational, allowing us to shave log factors in sample complexity from the best known efficient algorithms, efficient isoperimetric tilings are not known. To circumvent this, we introduce several relaxed paradigms that do allow for sample and computationally efficient algorithms, including allowing pre-processing, adaptivity, and approximate replicability. In these cases we give efficient algorithms matching or beating the best known sample complexity for mean estimation and the coin problem, including a generic procedure that reduces the standard quadratic overhead of replicability to linear in expectation.

Read more

6/6/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

On the Computational Landscape of Replicable Learning

Alkis Kalavasis, Amin Karbasi, Grigoris Velegkas, Felix Zhou

We study computational aspects of algorithmic replicability, a notion of stability introduced by Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorrell [2022]. Motivated by a recent line of work that established strong statistical connections between replicability and other notions of learnability such as online learning, private learning, and SQ learning, we aim to understand better the computational connections between replicability and these learning paradigms. Our first result shows that there is a concept class that is efficiently replicably PAC learnable, but, under standard cryptographic assumptions, no efficient online learner exists for this class. Subsequently, we design an efficient replicable learner for PAC learning parities when the marginal distribution is far from uniform, making progress on a question posed by Impagliazzo et al. [2022]. To obtain this result, we design a replicable lifting framework inspired by Blanc, Lange, Malik, and Tan [2023] that transforms in a black-box manner efficient replicable PAC learners under the uniform marginal distribution over the Boolean hypercube to replicable PAC learners under any marginal distribution, with sample and time complexity that depends on a certain measure of the complexity of the distribution. Finally, we show that any pure DP learner can be transformed to a replicable one in time polynomial in the accuracy, confidence parameters and exponential in the representation dimension of the underlying hypothesis class.

Read more

5/27/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Replicable Learning of Large-Margin Halfspaces

Alkis Kalavasis, Amin Karbasi, Kasper Green Larsen, Grigoris Velegkas, Felix Zhou

We provide efficient replicable algorithms for the problem of learning large-margin halfspaces. Our results improve upon the algorithms provided by Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorrell [STOC, 2022]. We design the first dimension-independent replicable algorithms for this task which runs in polynomial time, is proper, and has strictly improved sample complexity compared to the one achieved by Impagliazzo et al. [2022] with respect to all the relevant parameters. Moreover, our first algorithm has sample complexity that is optimal with respect to the accuracy parameter $epsilon$. We also design an SGD-based replicable algorithm that, in some parameters' regimes, achieves better sample and time complexity than our first algorithm. Departing from the requirement of polynomial time algorithms, using the DP-to-Replicability reduction of Bun, Gaboardi, Hopkins, Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, Sorrell, and Sivakumar [STOC, 2023], we show how to obtain a replicable algorithm for large-margin halfspaces with improved sample complexity with respect to the margin parameter $tau$, but running time doubly exponential in $1/tau^2$ and worse sample complexity dependence on $epsilon$ than one of our previous algorithms. We then design an improved algorithm with better sample complexity than all three of our previous algorithms and running time exponential in $1/tau^{2}$.

Read more

6/4/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimation

Samuel B. Hopkins, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Shyam Narayanan

We study the relationship between adversarial robustness and differential privacy in high-dimensional algorithmic statistics. We give the first black-box reduction from privacy to robustness which can produce private estimators with optimal tradeoffs among sample complexity, accuracy, and privacy for a wide range of fundamental high-dimensional parameter estimation problems, including mean and covariance estimation. We show that this reduction can be implemented in polynomial time in some important special cases. In particular, using nearly-optimal polynomial-time robust estimators for the mean and covariance of high-dimensional Gaussians which are based on the Sum-of-Squares method, we design the first polynomial-time private estimators for these problems with nearly-optimal samples-accuracy-privacy tradeoffs. Our algorithms are also robust to a nearly optimal fraction of adversarially-corrupted samples.

Read more

6/18/2024