Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical Estimation

2212.05015

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/18/2024 by Samuel B. Hopkins, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Shyam Narayanan

🎲

Abstract

We study the relationship between adversarial robustness and differential privacy in high-dimensional algorithmic statistics. We give the first black-box reduction from privacy to robustness which can produce private estimators with optimal tradeoffs among sample complexity, accuracy, and privacy for a wide range of fundamental high-dimensional parameter estimation problems, including mean and covariance estimation. We show that this reduction can be implemented in polynomial time in some important special cases. In particular, using nearly-optimal polynomial-time robust estimators for the mean and covariance of high-dimensional Gaussians which are based on the Sum-of-Squares method, we design the first polynomial-time private estimators for these problems with nearly-optimal samples-accuracy-privacy tradeoffs. Our algorithms are also robust to a nearly optimal fraction of adversarially-corrupted samples.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research explores the relationship between adversarial robustness and differential privacy in high-dimensional statistical problems.
  • The authors present a "black-box" reduction that can produce private estimators with optimal trade-offs between sample complexity, accuracy, and privacy for a wide range of high-dimensional parameter estimation tasks.
  • They show that this reduction can be implemented efficiently in certain important cases, such as estimating the mean and covariance of high-dimensional Gaussian distributions.
  • The algorithms they develop are not only private, but also robust to a near-optimal fraction of adversarially corrupted samples.

Plain English Explanation

In this research, the authors investigate the connections between two important concepts in machine learning and data analysis: adversarial robustness and differential privacy.

Adversarial robustness refers to the ability of an algorithm to maintain its performance even when the input data has been maliciously altered. Differential privacy, on the other hand, is a mathematical framework for ensuring that the output of an algorithm does not reveal too much about any individual data point used as input.

The authors show that there is a deep connection between these two properties. By leveraging this connection, they develop a general-purpose technique that can take any algorithm for a high-dimensional statistical task (like estimating the mean or covariance of a dataset) and transform it into an algorithm that is both differentially private and adversarially robust.

Importantly, the authors demonstrate that this transformation can be done efficiently in several important cases, leading to the first polynomial-time private and robust estimators for problems like mean and covariance estimation. These estimators achieve optimal trade-offs between the number of samples needed, the accuracy of the estimates, and the level of privacy guaranteed.

Technical Explanation

The core technical contribution of this paper is a "black-box" reduction that can take any algorithm for a high-dimensional statistical task and transform it into a differentially private and adversarially robust algorithm.

At a high level, the reduction works by first making the original algorithm robust to adversarial corruptions of the input data. It does this by leveraging recent advances in robust statistics, which have produced efficient algorithms for tasks like mean and covariance estimation that can tolerate a large fraction of maliciously altered data points.

The authors then show that these adversarially robust algorithms can be further transformed into differentially private algorithms using a novel connection between robustness and privacy. Intuitively, the robustness of the algorithm ensures that the output does not depend too sensitively on any individual data point, which is the key requirement for differential privacy.

Importantly, the authors demonstrate that this reduction can be efficiently implemented in polynomial time for several fundamental high-dimensional estimation problems, including mean and covariance estimation. By combining their private and robust estimators with recent advances in spectral graph theory, they obtain the first polynomial-time private estimators for these problems that achieve optimal trade-offs between sample complexity, accuracy, and privacy.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a compelling and technically sophisticated connection between adversarial robustness and differential privacy. Their reduction is a significant theoretical advance, as it provides a general-purpose technique for converting any high-dimensional statistical algorithm into one that is both private and robust.

One potential limitation of the work is that the efficient implementations they provide are still quite complex, relying on advanced tools from robust statistics and spectral graph theory. It would be interesting to see if simpler and more practical private and robust estimators could be developed using the authors' framework.

Additionally, while the authors discuss the near-optimality of their estimators in terms of sample complexity and accuracy, they do not provide any empirical evaluations or comparisons to existing approaches. Experimental validation on real-world datasets would help to further demonstrate the practical utility of their techniques.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in understanding the interplay between robustness and privacy, and provides a promising foundation for developing the next generation of high-dimensional statistical algorithms with strong security guarantees.

Conclusion

This paper explores the deep connections between adversarial robustness and differential privacy in high-dimensional statistical estimation problems. The authors present a general-purpose technique for converting any high-dimensional statistical algorithm into one that is both private and robust, and demonstrate efficient implementations for important tasks like mean and covariance estimation.

The work advances our theoretical understanding of the relationship between these two crucial properties, and lays the groundwork for developing practical machine learning and data analysis tools with strong security guarantees. As data privacy and robustness to adversarial attacks become increasingly critical in real-world applications, this research represents an important contribution to the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🛠️

Differential Privacy via Distributionally Robust Optimization

Aras Selvi, Huikang Liu, Wolfram Wiesemann

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, differential privacy has emerged as the de facto standard for sharing statistics of datasets while limiting the disclosure of private information about the involved individuals. This is achieved by randomly perturbing the statistics to be published, which in turn leads to a privacy-accuracy trade-off: larger perturbations provide stronger privacy guarantees, but they result in less accurate statistics that offer lower utility to the recipients. Of particular interest are therefore optimal mechanisms that provide the highest accuracy for a pre-selected level of privacy. To date, work in this area has focused on specifying families of perturbations a priori and subsequently proving their asymptotic and/or best-in-class optimality. In this paper, we develop a class of mechanisms that enjoy non-asymptotic and unconditional optimality guarantees. To this end, we formulate the mechanism design problem as an infinite-dimensional distributionally robust optimization problem. We show that the problem affords a strong dual, and we exploit this duality to develop converging hierarchies of finite-dimensional upper and lower bounding problems. Our upper (primal) bounds correspond to implementable perturbations whose suboptimality can be bounded by our lower (dual) bounds. Both bounding problems can be solved within seconds via cutting plane techniques that exploit the inherent problem structure. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our perturbations can outperform the previously best results from the literature on artificial as well as standard benchmark problems.

Read more

5/24/2024

Treatment of Statistical Estimation Problems in Randomized Smoothing for Adversarial Robustness

Treatment of Statistical Estimation Problems in Randomized Smoothing for Adversarial Robustness

Vaclav Voracek

YC

0

Reddit

0

Randomized smoothing is a popular certified defense against adversarial attacks. In its essence, we need to solve a problem of statistical estimation which is usually very time-consuming since we need to perform numerous (usually $10^5$) forward passes of the classifier for every point to be certified. In this paper, we review the statistical estimation problems for randomized smoothing to find out if the computational burden is necessary. In particular, we consider the (standard) task of adversarial robustness where we need to decide if a point is robust at a certain radius or not using as few samples as possible while maintaining statistical guarantees. We present estimation procedures employing confidence sequences enjoying the same statistical guarantees as the standard methods, with the optimal sample complexities for the estimation task and empirically demonstrate their good performance. Additionally, we provide a randomized version of Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals resulting in strictly stronger certificates.

Read more

6/27/2024

🚀

Private Mean Estimation with Person-Level Differential Privacy

Sushant Agarwal, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Argyris Mouzakis, Rose Silver, Jonathan Ullman

YC

0

Reddit

0

We study differentially private (DP) mean estimation in the case where each person holds multiple samples. Commonly referred to as the user-level setting, DP here requires the usual notion of distributional stability when all of a person's datapoints can be modified. Informally, if $n$ people each have $m$ samples from an unknown $d$-dimensional distribution with bounded $k$-th moments, we show that [n = tilde Thetaleft(frac{d}{alpha^2 m} + frac{d }{ alpha m^{1/2} varepsilon} + frac{d}{alpha^{k/(k-1)} m varepsilon} + frac{d}{varepsilon}right)] people are necessary and sufficient to estimate the mean up to distance $alpha$ in $ell_2$-norm under $varepsilon$-differential privacy (and its common relaxations). In the multivariate setting, we give computationally efficient algorithms under approximate DP (with slightly degraded sample complexity) and computationally inefficient algorithms under pure DP, and our nearly matching lower bounds hold for the most permissive case of approximate DP. Our computationally efficient estimators are based on the well known noisy-clipped-mean approach, but the analysis for our setting requires new bounds on the tails of sums of independent, vector-valued, bounded-moments random variables, and a new argument for bounding the bias introduced by clipping.

Read more

6/3/2024

🤯

Causal Inference with Differentially Private (Clustered) Outcomes

Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni, Jean Pouget-Abadie

YC

0

Reddit

0

Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only feasible if participants agree to reveal their potentially sensitive responses. Of the many ways of ensuring privacy, label differential privacy is a widely used measure of an algorithm's privacy guarantee, which might encourage participants to share responses without running the risk of de-anonymization. Many differentially private mechanisms inject noise into the original data-set to achieve this privacy guarantee, which increases the variance of most statistical estimators and makes the precise measurement of causal effects difficult: there exists a fundamental privacy-variance trade-off to performing causal analyses from differentially private data. With the aim of achieving lower variance for stronger privacy guarantees, we suggest a new differential privacy mechanism, Cluster-DP, which leverages any given cluster structure of the data while still allowing for the estimation of causal effects. We show that, depending on an intuitive measure of cluster quality, we can improve the variance loss while maintaining our privacy guarantees. We compare its performance, theoretically and empirically, to that of its unclustered version and a more extreme uniform-prior version which does not use any of the original response distribution, both of which are special cases of the Cluster-DP algorithm.

Read more

5/1/2024