Representation noising effectively prevents harmful fine-tuning on LLMs
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Releasing open-source large language models (LLMs) poses a dual-use risk, as bad actors can easily fine-tune these models for harmful purposes.
- Even without the open release of weights, weight stealing and fine-tuning APIs make closed models vulnerable to harmful fine-tuning attacks (HFAs).
- Safety measures like preventing jailbreaks and improving safety guardrails can be easily reversed through fine-tuning.
- The paper proposes a defense mechanism called Representation Noising (RepNoise) that is effective even when attackers have access to the weights and the defender no longer has any control.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and GPT-4 are incredibly powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. While these models have many beneficial applications, they also present a risk: bad actors could fine-tune them to create harmful content, like disinformation, hate speech, or instructions for illegal activities.
Even if the original weights of an LLM are not publicly released, attackers can still access the model's capabilities through techniques like weight stealing or by using fine-tuning APIs. This makes the model vulnerable to what the researchers call "harmful fine-tuning attacks" (HFAs). Attempts to make LLMs more secure, such as preventing "jailbreaks" or improving safety guardrails, can often be reversed through further fine-tuning.
To address this issue, the researchers propose a new defense mechanism called "Representation Noising" (RepNoise). RepNoise works by removing certain types of information from the model's representations, making it difficult for attackers to recover that information and use it for harmful purposes, even if they have full access to the model's weights.
Importantly, the researchers show that RepNoise can generalize to different types of harmful content, without needing to know about them in advance. This means the defense can be effective against a wide range of potential misuses, not just the ones the researchers have explicitly trained for.
The key insight behind the effectiveness of RepNoise is that it removes information about harmful representations across multiple layers of the LLM, rather than just at the surface level. This depth of the defense is what makes it so robust against fine-tuning attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a defense mechanism called Representation Noising (RepNoise) to address the vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) to harmful fine-tuning attacks (HFAs). Even when attackers have access to the model's weights and the defender has lost control, RepNoise can effectively remove information about harmful representations from the model, making it difficult for attackers to recover and misuse that information.
The core idea behind RepNoise is to introduce noise into the model's representations during training, in a way that specifically targets and degrades information related to harmful content, while preserving the model's general capabilities. This is achieved by jointly training the model on a mix of clean and "noised" data, where the noising process is designed to remove harmful patterns from the representations.
Importantly, the researchers show that RepNoise can generalize to different types of harmful content, without needing to know about them in advance. This is a key advantage over approaches that rely on explicitly defining and training against a fixed set of harms.
The paper provides empirical evidence that the effectiveness of RepNoise lies in its depth: the degree to which information about harmful representations is removed across all layers of the LLM, rather than just at the surface level. This depth of the defense makes it resistant to fine-tuning attacks that try to recover the lost information.
The researchers evaluate RepNoise on a range of tasks and find that it can effectively mitigate HFAs while preserving the model's general capabilities. They also discuss potential limitations and areas for further research, such as the need to better understand the relationship between the depth of the defense and its robustness.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have proposed a novel and promising defense mechanism in the form of Representation Noising (RepNoise) to address the vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) to harmful fine-tuning attacks (HFAs). The key strengths of their approach are its ability to generalize to different types of harmful content, and the depth of the defense mechanism across multiple layers of the model.
However, the paper does raise some important caveats and areas for further research. For example, the researchers acknowledge that while RepNoise can effectively mitigate HFAs, it may not be able to completely prevent them, especially in the face of highly sophisticated attackers. Additionally, the relationship between the depth of the defense and its robustness is not fully understood, and more work is needed to explore this.
Another potential concern is the impact of RepNoise on the model's general capabilities. While the researchers claim that their defense does not degrade the model's performance on harmless tasks, it would be valuable to further investigate the potential trade-offs between the strength of the defense and the model's overall capabilities.
Furthermore, the paper does not address the broader societal implications of large language models and the potential for misuse. While RepNoise is a valuable technical contribution, it is important to consider the wider context and the need for comprehensive approaches to AI safety and ethical development.
Overall, the Representation Noising (RepNoise) defense proposed in this paper is a significant step forward in addressing the challenges posed by the dual-use nature of large language models. However, continued research and a multifaceted approach will be necessary to ensure the responsible development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel defense mechanism called Representation Noising (RepNoise) to address the vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) to harmful fine-tuning attacks (HFAs). By removing information about harmful representations across multiple layers of the model, RepNoise can effectively mitigate the risk of misuse by bad actors, even when they have full access to the model's weights.
The key strengths of RepNoise are its ability to generalize to different types of harmful content and the depth of the defense, which makes it resistant to fine-tuning attacks. However, the paper also highlights important caveats, such as the potential limitations in completely preventing HFAs and the need to further understand the trade-offs between the defense's strength and the model's general capabilities.
Overall, the Representation Noising (RepNoise) defense is a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure the responsible development and deployment of powerful large language models. While technical solutions like RepNoise are important, addressing the broader societal implications of these AI systems will require a multifaceted approach involving policymakers, researchers, and the wider community.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Representation noising effectively prevents harmful fine-tuning on LLMs
Domenic Rosati, Jan Wehner, Kai Williams, {L}ukasz Bartoszcze, David Atanasov, Robie Gonzales, Subhabrata Majumdar, Carsten Maple, Hassan Sajjad, Frank Rudzicz
Releasing open-source large language models (LLMs) presents a dual-use risk since bad actors can easily fine-tune these models for harmful purposes. Even without the open release of weights, weight stealing and fine-tuning APIs make closed models vulnerable to harmful fine-tuning attacks (HFAs). While safety measures like preventing jailbreaks and improving safety guardrails are important, such measures can easily be reversed through fine-tuning. In this work, we propose Representation Noising (RepNoise), a defence mechanism that is effective even when attackers have access to the weights and the defender no longer has any control. RepNoise works by removing information about harmful representations such that it is difficult to recover them during fine-tuning. Importantly, our defence is also able to generalize across different subsets of harm that have not been seen during the defence process. Our method does not degrade the general capability of LLMs and retains the ability to train the model on harmless tasks. We provide empirical evidence that the effectiveness of our defence lies in its depth: the degree to which information about harmful representations is removed across all layers of the LLM.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Rethinking Jailbreaking through the Lens of Representation Engineering
Tianlong Li, Shihan Dou, Wenhao Liu, Muling Wu, Changze Lv, Rui Zheng, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang
The recent surge in jailbreaking methods has revealed the vulnerability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to malicious inputs. While earlier research has primarily concentrated on increasing the success rates of jailbreaking attacks, the underlying mechanism for safeguarding LLMs remains underexplored. This study investigates the vulnerability of safety-aligned LLMs by uncovering specific activity patterns within the representation space generated by LLMs. Such ``safety patterns'' can be identified with only a few pairs of contrastive queries in a simple method and function as ``keys'' (used as a metaphor for security defense capability) that can be used to open or lock Pandora's Box of LLMs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the robustness of LLMs against jailbreaking can be lessened or augmented by attenuating or strengthening the identified safety patterns. These findings deepen our understanding of jailbreaking phenomena and call for the LLM community to address the potential misuse of open-source LLMs.
Read more8/7/2024
🚀
0
Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuning
Qiusi Zhan, Richard Fang, Rohan Bindu, Akul Gupta, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Daniel Kang
As large language models (LLMs) have increased in their capabilities, so does their potential for dual use. To reduce harmful outputs, produces and vendors of LLMs have used reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF). In tandem, LLM vendors have been increasingly enabling fine-tuning of their most powerful models. However, concurrent work has shown that fine-tuning can remove RLHF protections. We may expect that the most powerful models currently available (GPT-4) are less susceptible to fine-tuning attacks. In this work, we show the contrary: fine-tuning allows attackers to remove RLHF protections with as few as 340 examples and a 95% success rate. These training examples can be automatically generated with weaker models. We further show that removing RLHF protections does not decrease usefulness on non-censored outputs, providing evidence that our fine-tuning strategy does not decrease usefulness despite using weaker models to generate training data. Our results show the need for further research on protections on LLMs.
Read more4/9/2024
🛠️
0
LoFiT: Localized Fine-tuning on LLM Representations
Fangcong Yin, Xi Ye, Greg Durrett
Recent work in interpretability shows that large language models (LLMs) can be adapted for new tasks in a learning-free way: it is possible to intervene on LLM representations to elicit desired behaviors for alignment. For instance, adding certain bias vectors to the outputs of certain attention heads is reported to boost the truthfulness of models. In this work, we show that localized fine-tuning serves as an effective alternative to such representation intervention methods. We introduce a framework called Localized Fine-Tuning on LLM Representations (LoFiT), which identifies a subset of attention heads that are most important for learning a specific task, then trains offset vectors to add to the model's hidden representations at those selected heads. LoFiT localizes to a sparse set of heads (3%) and learns the offset vectors from limited training data, comparable to the settings used for representation intervention. For truthfulness and reasoning tasks, we find that LoFiT's intervention vectors are more effective for LLM adaptation than vectors from representation intervention methods such as Inference-time Intervention. We also find that the localization step is important: selecting a task-specific set of attention heads can lead to higher performance than intervening on heads selected for a different task. Finally, for the tasks we study, LoFiT achieves comparable performance to other parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA, despite modifying 20x-200x fewer parameters than these methods.
Read more6/4/2024