Representation Tuning

Read original: arXiv:2409.06927 - Published 9/12/2024 by Christopher M. Ackerman
Total Score

0

Representation Tuning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses "Representation Tuning," a technique for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) to perform specific tasks or achieve desired outputs.
  • It explores methods for steering LLM representations to achieve desired behaviors, including Activation Addition, Representation Surgery, and Personalized Steering.
  • The paper presents several novel techniques and insights for effectively tuning LLM representations to solve a variety of tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are incredibly powerful, but they can be tricky to use for specific tasks. The paper discusses a technique called "Representation Tuning" that allows you to fine-tune these LLMs to do what you want.

The key idea is that you can "steer" the internal representations of the LLM to produce the outputs you're looking for. This is done through methods like Activation Addition, where you add custom activations to the model to nudge it in a certain direction, or Representation Surgery, which involves directly modifying the internal representations.

The paper presents several novel techniques for representation tuning and shows how they can be used to solve a wide range of tasks, from language generation to question answering. The main benefit is that you can take a powerful, general-purpose LLM and customize it to your specific needs, without having to train a whole new model from scratch.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores methods for "steering" the internal representations of large language models (LLMs) to achieve desired behaviors and outputs. This is known as "Representation Tuning."

The authors present several key techniques for representation tuning:

  1. Activation Addition: Adding custom activations to the LLM's internal representations to nudge the model in a certain direction, without requiring full optimization.

  2. Representation Surgery: Directly modifying the LLM's internal representations through learned affine transformations, allowing for more fine-grained control.

  3. Personalized Steering: Customizing the LLM's representations for individual users or tasks, enabling more personalized outputs.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of these representation tuning techniques across a variety of tasks, including language generation, question answering, and few-shot learning. The authors show how these methods can be used to fine-tune powerful, general-purpose LLMs to solve specific problems, without having to train entirely new models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive exploration of representation tuning techniques for large language models, offering valuable insights and practical methods for customizing LLM behavior. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations and areas for further research:

  • The techniques described are primarily evaluated on language-based tasks, and their applicability to other domains (e.g., vision, robotics) is not explicitly addressed.
  • The long-term stability and generalization of the tuned representations are not thoroughly examined, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployments.
  • The computational and memory overhead of the tuning approaches is not extensively analyzed, which could impact their practical feasibility, especially for resource-constrained deployments.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of representation tuning, it would be beneficial to see more comparisons to alternative fine-tuning or prompt-engineering approaches to better contextualize the relative merits of the proposed techniques.

Conclusion

The "Representation Tuning" paper presents a compelling set of techniques for fine-tuning large language models to achieve desired behaviors and outputs. By "steering" the internal representations of LLMs through methods like Activation Addition, Representation Surgery, and Personalized Steering, the authors show how these powerful models can be customized for a wide range of tasks and applications.

The insights and practical approaches described in the paper have the potential to significantly enhance the versatility and real-world applicability of large language models, allowing developers to tailor these models to their specific needs without having to train entirely new models from scratch. As the field of AI continues to evolve, representation tuning techniques like those presented in this paper will likely play an increasingly important role in unlocking the full potential of large-scale language models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Representation Tuning
Total Score

0

Representation Tuning

Christopher M. Ackerman

Activation engineering is becoming increasingly popular as a means of online control of large language models (LLMs). In this work, I extend the idea of active steering with vectors that represent a behavioral direction of interest to tuning those vectors directly into the model, obviating the need for online control. First, I identify activation vectors related to honesty in an open-source LLM (Llama- 2-13b-chat). Next, I demonstrate that model output can be made more or less honest by adding positive or negative multiples of these vectors to residual stream activations during generation. Then, I show that a similar effect can be achieved by fine-tuning the vectors directly into the model, by use of a dual loss function based on the cosine similarity of residual stream activations to the vectors combined with a standard token-based loss (representation tuning). Finally, I compare the generations in response to honesty-probing prompts from the resulting models to those from models fine-tuned with a token-based loss alone, and to those from the untuned model subjected to online steering. Overall, fine-tuning the vectors into the models using the cosine similarity plus token loss showed a stronger effect than online steering, and generalized better than using the standard loss, suggesting the potential utility of this approach as a safety measure. Code and data are available at https://github.com/cma1114/representation_tuning; tuned models are available at https://huggingface.co/collections/cackerman/ representation-tuning-66da1e5ab41cd1b824687d9f.

Read more

9/12/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Activation Addition: Steering Language Models Without Optimization

Alexander Matt Turner, Lisa Thiergart, Gavin Leech, David Udell, Juan J. Vazquez, Ulisse Mini, Monte MacDiarmid

Reliably controlling the behavior of large language models is a pressing open problem. Existing methods include supervised finetuning, reinforcement learning from human feedback, prompt engineering and guided decoding. We instead investigate activation engineering: modifying activations at inference-time to predictably alter model behavior. We bias the forward pass with a 'steering vector' implicitly specified through natural language. Past work learned these steering vectors; our Activation Addition (ActAdd) method instead computes them by taking activation differences resulting from pairs of prompts. We demonstrate ActAdd on a range of LLMs (LLaMA-3, OPT, GPT-2, and GPT-J), obtaining SOTA on detoxification and negative-to-positive sentiment control. Our approach yields inference-time control over high-level properties of output like topic and sentiment while preserving performance on off-target tasks. ActAdd takes far less compute and implementation effort than finetuning or RLHF, allows users control through natural language, and its computational overhead (as a fraction of inference time) appears stable or improving over increasing model size.

Read more

6/5/2024

Personalized Steering of Large Language Models: Versatile Steering Vectors Through Bi-directional Preference Optimization
Total Score

0

Personalized Steering of Large Language Models: Versatile Steering Vectors Through Bi-directional Preference Optimization

Yuanpu Cao, Tianrong Zhang, Bochuan Cao, Ziyi Yin, Lu Lin, Fenglong Ma, Jinghui Chen

Researchers have been studying approaches to steer the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) and build personalized LLMs tailored for various applications. While fine-tuning seems to be a direct solution, it requires substantial computational resources and may significantly affect the utility of the original LLM. Recent endeavors have introduced more lightweight strategies, focusing on extracting steering vectors to guide the model's output toward desired behaviors by adjusting activations within specific layers of the LLM's transformer architecture. However, such steering vectors are directly extracted from the activations of human preference data and thus often lead to suboptimal results and occasional failures, especially in alignment-related scenarios. This work proposes an innovative approach that could produce more effective steering vectors through bi-directional preference optimization. Our method is designed to allow steering vectors to directly influence the generation probability of contrastive human preference data pairs, thereby offering a more precise representation of the target behavior. By carefully adjusting the direction and magnitude of the steering vector, we enabled personalized control over the desired behavior across a spectrum of intensities. Extensive experimentation across various open-ended generation tasks, particularly focusing on steering AI personas, has validated the efficacy of our approach. Moreover, we comprehensively investigate critical alignment-concerning scenarios, such as managing truthfulness, mitigating hallucination, and addressing jailbreaking attacks. Remarkably, our method can still demonstrate outstanding steering effectiveness across these scenarios. Furthermore, we showcase the transferability of our steering vectors across different models/LoRAs and highlight the synergistic benefits of applying multiple vectors simultaneously.

Read more

7/31/2024

Representation Surgery: Theory and Practice of Affine Steering
Total Score

0

Representation Surgery: Theory and Practice of Affine Steering

Shashwat Singh, Shauli Ravfogel, Jonathan Herzig, Roee Aharoni, Ryan Cotterell, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru

Language models often exhibit undesirable behavior, e.g., generating toxic or gender-biased text. In the case of neural language models, an encoding of the undesirable behavior is often present in the model's representations. Thus, one natural (and common) approach to prevent the model from exhibiting undesirable behavior is to steer the model's representations in a manner that reduces the probability of it generating undesirable text. This paper investigates the formal and empirical properties of steering functions, i.e., transformation of the neural language model's representations that alter its behavior. First, we derive two optimal, in the least-squares sense, affine steering functions under different constraints. Our theory provides justification for existing approaches and offers a novel, improved steering approach. Second, we offer a series of experiments that demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of the methods in mitigating bias and reducing toxic generation.

Read more

6/6/2024