Reprompting: Automated Chain-of-Thought Prompt Inference Through Gibbs Sampling

Read original: arXiv:2305.09993 - Published 5/27/2024 by Weijia Xu, Andrzej Banburski-Fahey, Nebojsa Jojic

🤯

Overview

The paper introduces "Reprompting," an iterative sampling algorithm that automatically learns the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) recipes for a given task without human intervention.
Reprompting uses Gibbs sampling to infer the CoT recipes that work consistently well for a set of training samples.
The algorithm outperforms human-written CoT prompts by +9.4 points on average and achieves better performance than state-of-the-art prompt optimization and decoding algorithms.

Plain English Explanation

Reprompting is a new algorithm that can automatically figure out the best way to guide a large language model to solve complex reasoning tasks. These tasks often require a series of steps or a "chain of thought" to arrive at the correct answer.

The algorithm works by iteratively trying out different sets of instructions (called "recipes") for the language model. It starts with some initial recipes and then uses a technique called Gibbs sampling to gradually refine and improve the recipes based on how well they perform on a set of training problems.

Over time, the algorithm learns the recipes that work consistently well, without any human intervention. When tested on 20 challenging reasoning tasks, Reprompting was able to outperform the prompts that were carefully crafted by human experts. It also did better than other state-of-the-art methods for optimizing and decoding language model prompts.

The key innovation of Reprompting is that it can automatically discover the right "chain of thought" to solve complex problems, rather than requiring humans to provide those instructions. This could make it much easier to apply large language models to a wide range of reasoning tasks in the future.

Technical Explanation

Reprompting is an iterative sampling algorithm that learns the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) recipes for a given task through Gibbs sampling. The algorithm starts with some initial CoT recipes and then uses a Gibbs sampling process to iteratively refine them.

In each iteration, Reprompting samples a new CoT recipe using the previously sampled recipes as parent prompts. It then evaluates the new recipe on the training samples and keeps it if it performs better than the current set of recipes. Over many iterations, the algorithm converges to a set of CoT recipes that work consistently well for the given task.

The researchers conduct extensive experiments on 20 challenging reasoning tasks, comparing Reprompting to human-written CoT prompts as well as state-of-the-art prompt optimization and decoding algorithms. The results show that Reprompting outperforms human-written prompts by +9.4 points on average and achieves consistently better performance than the other methods.

This improvement is significant because crafting effective CoT prompts is a major challenge that has been the focus of prior work. Reprompting's ability to automatically discover these recipes without human intervention represents an important advance in prompt engineering for complex reasoning tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of Reprompting, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The experiments are limited to 20 reasoning tasks, so it's unclear how well the algorithm would generalize to a wider range of problem types. Further testing on more diverse tasks would help validate the approach.
The paper does not explore the interpretability of the learned CoT recipes. Understanding the reasoning behind these recipes could provide insights into how large language models solve complex problems, but the current work treats them as black boxes.
The algorithm's performance is still dependent on the quality of the initial CoT recipes used to seed the Gibbs sampling process. Developing techniques to automatically generate high-quality initial recipes could further improve Reprompting's effectiveness.
While Reprompting outperforms other prompt optimization methods, it is not clear how it compares to more recent approaches like soft prompting or residual prompting. Exploring these connections could lead to further advancements in prompt engineering.

Overall, Reprompting represents an impressive step forward in automating the discovery of effective prompts for complex reasoning tasks. While the current work has some limitations, the general approach shows promise and warrants further investigation.

Conclusion

The Reprompting algorithm introduced in this paper is a significant advancement in the field of prompt engineering for large language models. By automatically learning the Chain-of-Thought recipes that work best for a given task, Reprompting can outperform carefully crafted human-written prompts and state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques.

This breakthrough has important implications for expanding the capabilities of language models to tackle more complex reasoning and problem-solving tasks. If Reprompting can be further developed and scaled, it could make it much easier to deploy large language models across a wide range of real-world applications that require advanced cognitive skills.

While the current work has some limitations, the core ideas behind Reprompting represent an exciting step forward in the quest to make language models more autonomous, adaptable, and effective at solving challenging problems. As the field of AI continues to evolve, innovations like Reprompting will likely play a crucial role in unlocking the full potential of these powerful technologies.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Reprompting: Automated Chain-of-Thought Prompt Inference Through Gibbs Sampling

Weijia Xu, Andrzej Banburski-Fahey, Nebojsa Jojic

We introduce Reprompting, an iterative sampling algorithm that automatically learns the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) recipes for a given task without human intervention. Through Gibbs sampling, Reprompting infers the CoT recipes that work consistently well for a set of training samples by iteratively sampling new recipes using previously sampled recipes as parent prompts to solve other training problems. We conduct extensive experiments on 20 challenging reasoning tasks. Results show that Reprompting outperforms human-written CoT prompts substantially by +9.4 points on average. It also achieves consistently better performance than the state-of-the-art prompt optimization and decoding algorithms.

5/27/2024

🖼️

Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods

Xinyang Hu, Fengzhuo Zhang, Siyu Chen, Zhuoran Yang

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems using pretrained large language models (LLMs). In this work, we analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity. To this end, we introduce a multi-step latent variable model that encapsulates the reasoning process, where the latent variable encodes the task information. Under this framework, we demonstrate that when the pretraining dataset is sufficiently large, the estimator formed by CoT prompting is equivalent to a Bayesian estimator. This estimator effectively solves the multi-step reasoning problem by aggregating a posterior distribution inferred from the demonstration examples in the prompt. Moreover, we prove that the statistical error of the CoT estimator can be decomposed into two main components: (i) a prompting error, which arises from inferring the true task using CoT prompts, and (ii) the statistical error of the pretrained LLM. We establish that, under appropriate assumptions, the prompting error decays exponentially to zero as the number of demonstrations increases. Additionally, we explicitly characterize the approximation and generalization errors of the pretrained LLM. Notably, we construct a transformer model that approximates the target distribution of the multi-step reasoning problem with an error that decreases exponentially in the number of transformer blocks. Our analysis extends to other variants of CoT, including Self-Consistent CoT, Tree-of-Thought, and Selection-Inference, offering a broad perspective on the efficacy of these methods. We also provide numerical experiments to validate the theoretical findings.

8/29/2024

💬

Pattern-Aware Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models

Yufeng Zhang, Xuepeng Wang, Lingxiang Wu, Jinqiao Wang

Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting can guide language models to engage in complex multi-step reasoning. The quality of provided demonstrations significantly impacts the success of downstream inference tasks. While existing automated methods prioritize accuracy and semantics in these demonstrations, we show that the underlying reasoning patterns play a more crucial role in such tasks. In this paper, we propose Pattern-Aware CoT, a prompting method that considers the diversity of demonstration patterns. By incorporating patterns such as step length and reasoning process within intermediate steps, PA-CoT effectively mitigates the issue of bias induced by demonstrations and enables better generalization to diverse scenarios. We conduct experiments on nine reasoning benchmark tasks using two open-source LLMs. The results show that our method substantially enhances reasoning performance and exhibits robustness to errors. The code will be made publicly available.

4/24/2024

🌿

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting

Xuezhi Wang, Denny Zhou

In enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prior research primarily focuses on specific prompting techniques such as few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. These methods, while effective, often involve manually intensive prompt engineering. Our study takes a novel approach by asking: Can LLMs reason effectively without prompting? Our findings reveal that, intriguingly, CoT reasoning paths can be elicited from pre-trained LLMs by simply altering the textit{decoding} process. Rather than conventional greedy decoding, we investigate the top-$k$ alternative tokens, uncovering that CoT paths are frequently inherent in these sequences. This approach not only bypasses the confounders of prompting but also allows us to assess the LLMs' textit{intrinsic} reasoning abilities. Moreover, we observe that the presence of a CoT in the decoding path correlates with a higher confidence in the model's decoded answer. This confidence metric effectively differentiates between CoT and non-CoT paths. Extensive empirical studies on various reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed CoT-decoding effectively elicits reasoning capabilities from language models, which were previously obscured by standard greedy decoding.

5/27/2024