Resprompt: Residual Connection Prompting Advances Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models

Overview

• Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has unlocked the reasoning potential of large language models (LLMs), but struggles with problems requiring multiple reasoning steps.
• The complex reasoning process in multi-step problems is better represented as a graph, but the linear structure of CoT prompting fails to capture this.
• The paper proposes a new prompting strategy called Residual Connection Prompting (RESPROMPT) to address this challenge.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a problem with a common technique called Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting that is used to improve the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). CoT prompting helps LLMs show their step-by-step work when solving problems, which is very useful.

However, CoT prompting has limitations when it comes to problems that require multiple reasoning steps. In these more complex problems, the later steps often depend on the results of several earlier steps, not just the immediately preceding one. This makes the reasoning process more like a graph structure, rather than the simple linear flow of CoT prompting.

To address this, the researchers propose a new technique called Residual Connection Prompting (RESPROMPT). The key idea is to reconstruct the reasoning graph within the prompts given to the LLM. This is done by including "residual connections" - links between steps that may not be directly sequential, but are important for the overall reasoning process.

By incorporating these residual connections, RESPROMPT is able to better capture the complex graph-like structure of multi-step reasoning problems. The researchers found that this leads to significant improvements in reasoning accuracy, especially for problems requiring 5 or more steps.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new prompting strategy called Residual Connection Prompting (RESPROMPT) to improve the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).

The researchers start by observing that the standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique, while effective, struggles with problems that require complex, multi-step reasoning. This is because the linear, sequential structure of CoT prompting fails to capture the graph-like nature of the underlying reasoning process in such problems.

To address this, the key idea behind RESPROMPT is to reconstruct the reasoning graph within the prompts given to the LLM. The researchers achieve this by integrating necessary "residual connections" - links between reasoning steps that may not be directly sequential, but are crucial for the overall reasoning process. These residual connections morph the linear CoT structure into a more accurate graph representation of the complex reasoning.

The researchers evaluate RESPROMPT on six benchmarks across three diverse domains: math, sequential, and commonsense reasoning. For the open-sourced LLaMA family of models, RESPROMPT yields a significant average reasoning accuracy improvement of 12.5% on LLaMA-65B and 6.8% on LLaMA2-70B.

Importantly, the benefits of RESPROMPT are most pronounced for questions demanding at least five reasoning steps. Here, RESPROMPT outperforms the best CoT-based benchmarks by a remarkable average improvement of 21.1% on LLaMA-65B and 14.3% on LLaMA2-70B.

Through extensive ablation studies and analyses, the researchers pinpoint how to most effectively build these residual connections to maximize the reasoning performance of RESPROMPT.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling solution to an important limitation of existing CoT prompting techniques. By introducing the concept of "residual connections" to better capture the graph-like structure of complex reasoning processes, the researchers have made a meaningful contribution to improving the multi-step reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

That said, the paper does not extensively discuss potential limitations or caveats of the RESPROMPT approach. For example, it would be useful to understand how the method performs on even more challenging reasoning tasks, or how it scales as the number of reasoning steps increases further.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on evaluating RESPROMPT on the LLaMA family of models. It would be valuable to see how the technique generalizes to a wider range of LLMs, including those from other research groups and companies.

Finally, the paper does not delve into the computational and memory overhead introduced by the RESPROMPT prompting strategy. Understanding the trade-offs in terms of inference time and resource utilization would help practitioners make informed decisions about when and how to apply this technique.

Overall, the RESPROMPT approach represents a promising step forward in enhancing the multi-step reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Further research and real-world validation will be important to fully assess the merits and limitations of this new prompting strategy.

Conclusion

The paper proposes a novel prompting strategy called Residual Connection Prompting (RESPROMPT) to address the limitations of the standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting technique when it comes to complex, multi-step reasoning problems.

By integrating "residual connections" into the prompts, RESPROMPT is able to better capture the graph-like structure of the underlying reasoning process, leading to significant improvements in reasoning accuracy, especially for problems requiring 5 or more steps.

The researchers' evaluation of RESPROMPT on a diverse set of benchmarks, including the open-sourced LLaMA models, demonstrates the power of this new approach. While further research is needed to fully understand the method's limitations and broader applicability, RESPROMPT represents an important step forward in enhancing the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models.