Resilient Consensus Sustained Collaboratively

Read original: arXiv:2302.02325 - Published 7/22/2024 by Junchao Chen, Suyash Gupta, Alberto Sonnino, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Mohammad Sadoghi
Total Score

0

⚙️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the limitations of existing blockchain consensus protocols, such as Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS), and proposes a novel Power-of-Collaboration (PoC) protocol to address the issue of long-range attacks.
  • PoW is known to be energy-intensive, while PoS and Malicious Fault-Tolerant (MFT) protocols face the challenge of ensuring the long-term safety of private keys.
  • The PoC protocol aims to guard existing PoS and MFT blockchains against long-range attacks while only marginally impacting their throughput.

Plain English Explanation

Blockchains are decentralized platforms that allow for secure, transparent, and tamper-resistant record-keeping. The way blockchains decide what information to add to their ledger is called a consensus protocol. The most well-known consensus protocol is Proof-of-Work (PoW), which requires participants to perform complex computations, leading to massive energy wastage.

To address this issue, newer blockchains have experimented with alternative consensus protocols, such as Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Malicious Fault-Tolerant (MFT). These protocols aim to replace the energy-intensive PoW with more efficient approaches. However, these protocols face a new challenge: the long-term safety of the private keys used by participants. If these private keys are compromised, it could lead to long-range attacks that undermine the integrity of the blockchain.

To solve this problem, the researchers have developed a novel consensus protocol called Power-of-Collaboration (PoC). PoC is designed to be easily integrated with existing PoS and MFT blockchains, providing an additional layer of security against long-range attacks without significantly impacting the blockchain's overall performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the design of the Power-of-Collaboration (PoC) protocol, which aims to guard existing Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Malicious Fault-Tolerant (MFT) blockchains against long-range attacks.

The PoC protocol works by introducing a new type of participant called a "Collaborator." Collaborators are responsible for monitoring the blockchain and verifying the validity of new blocks. They are incentivized to participate through a reward system, which ensures that they have a vested interest in the long-term health of the blockchain.

The PoC protocol is designed to be easily appended to existing PoS and MFT blockchains, with only a marginal impact on their throughput. The researchers have conducted experiments to evaluate the performance of PoC and have demonstrated its effectiveness in mitigating long-range attacks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to addressing the issue of long-range attacks in PoS and MFT blockchains. The PoC protocol's ability to be easily integrated with existing blockchains is a significant advantage, as it allows for widespread adoption without requiring a complete overhaul of the underlying infrastructure.

However, the paper does not explore the potential drawbacks or limitations of the PoC protocol in depth. For example, the long-term sustainability of the Collaborator incentive system and the potential for collusion or manipulation within the Collaborator pool are not discussed in detail.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential impact of the PoC protocol on the decentralization and censorship resistance of the underlying blockchain. As the Collaborators play a crucial role in verifying the validity of new blocks, there is a risk that they could potentially become a centralized point of control or failure.

Further research and real-world deployment of the PoC protocol would be necessary to fully understand its strengths, weaknesses, and implications for the broader blockchain ecosystem. Researchers and developers should critically evaluate the PoC protocol and consider potential alternatives or complementary approaches to addressing the challenge of long-range attacks.

Conclusion

The Power-of-Collaboration (PoC) protocol presented in this paper offers a novel solution to the problem of long-range attacks in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Malicious Fault-Tolerant (MFT) blockchains. By introducing a new type of participant called Collaborators, the PoC protocol provides an additional layer of security without significantly impacting the performance of the underlying blockchain.

The PoC protocol's ability to be easily integrated with existing PoS and MFT blockchains is a significant advantage, as it allows for widespread adoption and deployment. However, further research is needed to fully understand the potential drawbacks and limitations of the PoC protocol, such as its impact on decentralization and the long-term sustainability of the Collaborator incentive system.

As blockchain technology continues to evolve and gain widespread adoption, the development of robust and secure consensus protocols will be crucial. The PoC protocol represents an important step forward in this direction, but more work is needed to ensure the long-term viability and resilience of decentralized blockchain networks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

⚙️

Total Score

0

Resilient Consensus Sustained Collaboratively

Junchao Chen, Suyash Gupta, Alberto Sonnino, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Mohammad Sadoghi

Decentralized systems built around blockchain technology promise clients an immutable ledger. They add a transaction to the ledger after it undergoes consensus among the replicas that run a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) or Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) consensus protocol. Unfortunately, these protocols face a long-range attack where an adversary having access to the private keys of the replicas can rewrite the ledger. One solution is forcing each committed block from these protocols to undergo another consensus, Proof-of-Work(PoW) consensus; PoW protocol leads to wastage of computational resources as miners compete to solve complex puzzles. In this paper, we present the design of our Power-of-Collaboration (PoC) protocol, which guards existing PoS/BFT blockchains against long-range attacks and requires miners to collaborate rather than compete. PoC guarantees fairness and accountability and only marginally degrades the throughput of the underlying system.

Read more

7/22/2024

Proof-of-Collaborative-Learning: A Multi-winner Federated Learning Consensus Algorithm
Total Score

0

Proof-of-Collaborative-Learning: A Multi-winner Federated Learning Consensus Algorithm

Amirreza Sokhankhosh, Sara Rouhani

Regardless of their variations, blockchains require a consensus mechanism to validate transactions, supervise added blocks, maintain network security, synchronize the network state, and distribute incentives. Proof-of-Work (PoW), one of the most influential implementations of consensus mechanisms, consumes an extraordinary amount of energy for a task that lacks direct productive output. In this paper, we propose Proof-of-Collaborative-Learning (PoCL), a multi-winner federated learning validated consensus mechanism that redirects the computation power of blockchains to train federated learning models. In addition, we present a novel evaluation mechanism to ensure the efficiency of the locally trained models of miners. We evaluated the security of our evaluation mechanism by introducing and conducting probable attacks. Moreover, we present a novel reward distribution mechanism to incentivize winning miners fairly, and demonstrate that our reward system is fair both within and across all rounds.

Read more

7/25/2024

Before and After Blockchain: Development and Principle of Distributed Fault Tolerance Consensus
Total Score

0

Before and After Blockchain: Development and Principle of Distributed Fault Tolerance Consensus

Huanyu Wu, Chentao Yue, Yixuan Fan, Yonghui Li, Lei Zhang

The concept of distributed consensus gained widespread attention following the publication of ``Byzantine Generals Problem'' by Leslie Lamport in the 1980s. This research topic has been active and extensively studied over the last four decades, particularly since the advent of blockchain technology in 2009. Blockchain technology employs Proof-of-X (PoX) or Byzantine-fault-tolerant (BFT) systems, where all participants follow a protocol to achieve a common state (i.e., consistency) eventually. However, because PoX consensus such as Proof-of-Work is is resource-intensive with high power consumption, most permissioned blockchains employ BFT to achieve consistency. In this article, we provide an introduction to the fundamental principles and history of distributed consensus. We then explore the well-known fault-tolerant state machine replication (SMR) in partially synchronous networks, as well as consensus protocols in asynchronous models and recently proposed DAG-based consensus. Additionally, we examine the relationship between BFT consensus and blockchain technology and discuss the following questions: What is the history and evolution of BFT? Why are BFT protocols designed in the way they are and what core components do they use? What is the connection between BFT and blockchain technology, and what are the driving needs for future BFT research?

Read more

7/30/2024

Fuzzychain: An Equitable Consensus Mechanism for Blockchain Networks
Total Score

0

Fuzzychain: An Equitable Consensus Mechanism for Blockchain Networks

Bruno Ramos-Cruz, Javier Andreu-P'erez, Francisco J. Quesada, Luis Mart'inez

Blockchain technology has become a trusted method for establishing secure and transparent transactions through a distributed, encrypted network. The operation of blockchain is governed by consensus algorithms, among which Proof of Stake (PoS) is popular yet has its drawbacks, notably the potential for centralising power in nodes with larger stakes or higher rewards. Fuzzychain, our proposed solution, introduces the use of fuzzy sets to define stake semantics, promoting decentralised and distributed processing control. This system selects validators based on their degree of membership to the stake fuzzy sets rather than just the size of their stakes. As a pioneer proposal in applying fuzzy sets to blockchain, Fuzzychain aims to rectify PoS's limitations. Our results indicate that Fuzzychain not only matches PoS in functionality but also ensures a fairer distribution of stakes among validators, leading to more inclusive validator selection and a better-distributed network.

Read more

6/3/2024