Before and After Blockchain: Development and Principle of Distributed Fault Tolerance Consensus
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a plain English summary of a research paper on distributed fault tolerance consensus before and after the development of blockchain technology
- Covers the key ideas, technical explanations, and critical analysis of the research
- Aims to make complex concepts more accessible to a general audience through analogies and examples
Plain English Explanation
The research paper discusses the development and principles of distributed fault tolerance consensus, both before and after the advent of blockchain technology. Distributed systems are computer networks where tasks are divided among multiple interconnected devices, rather than a single central server. Consensus is the process of these devices agreeing on a common state or decision, even when some of the devices may be faulty or untrustworthy.
Before blockchain, researchers focused on Byzantine fault tolerance - the ability of a distributed system to withstand failures or attacks by malicious actors. Algorithms were developed to ensure that the system could reach a consensus despite some devices behaving unexpectedly or trying to disrupt the process.
The introduction of blockchain technology changed the landscape of distributed consensus. Blockchain provides a decentralized, transparent, and secure way of reaching consensus without relying on a central authority. This has had a significant impact on various industries, from finance to supply chain management.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the evolution of distributed fault tolerance consensus, starting from the early years before blockchain and then examining the impact of blockchain on this field. It delves into the technical details of consensus algorithms, such as Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT), and how they have been adapted and improved over time.
The paper also discusses the unique challenges and requirements of achieving consensus in a decentralized, high-speed environment, such as those found in blockchain networks. It examines the trade-offs between factors like throughput, latency, and security, and how various consensus protocols have been designed to address these challenges.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges some of the limitations and areas for further research in the field of distributed fault tolerance consensus. For example, it mentions the need to explore more efficient and scalable consensus algorithms to keep pace with the growing demands of blockchain-based applications.
Additionally, the paper raises the question of how to ensure the long-term sustainability and resilience of these consensus mechanisms, as they become increasingly crucial to the functioning of various industries and societal systems. Further research may be needed to address potential vulnerabilities or attack vectors that could undermine the reliability of distributed consensus over time.
Conclusion
The research paper provides a comprehensive overview of the development and principles of distributed fault tolerance consensus, both before and after the emergence of blockchain technology. It highlights the significant impact that blockchain has had on this field, transforming the way we achieve consensus in decentralized systems.
The insights from this paper can have far-reaching implications for the continued evolution and adoption of blockchain-based solutions, as well as the broader field of distributed systems and their role in shaping the future of technology and society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Before and After Blockchain: Development and Principle of Distributed Fault Tolerance Consensus
Huanyu Wu, Chentao Yue, Yixuan Fan, Yonghui Li, Lei Zhang
The concept of distributed consensus gained widespread attention following the publication of ``Byzantine Generals Problem'' by Leslie Lamport in the 1980s. This research topic has been active and extensively studied over the last four decades, particularly since the advent of blockchain technology in 2009. Blockchain technology employs Proof-of-X (PoX) or Byzantine-fault-tolerant (BFT) systems, where all participants follow a protocol to achieve a common state (i.e., consistency) eventually. However, because PoX consensus such as Proof-of-Work is is resource-intensive with high power consumption, most permissioned blockchains employ BFT to achieve consistency. In this article, we provide an introduction to the fundamental principles and history of distributed consensus. We then explore the well-known fault-tolerant state machine replication (SMR) in partially synchronous networks, as well as consensus protocols in asynchronous models and recently proposed DAG-based consensus. Additionally, we examine the relationship between BFT consensus and blockchain technology and discuss the following questions: What is the history and evolution of BFT? Why are BFT protocols designed in the way they are and what core components do they use? What is the connection between BFT and blockchain technology, and what are the driving needs for future BFT research?
Read more7/30/2024
0
A Study on Asynchronous Vote-based Blockchains
Yibin Xu, Jianhua Shao, Tijs Slaats, Boris Dudder, Yongluan Zhou
Vote-based blockchains construct a state machine replication (SMR) system among participating nodes, using Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) consensus protocols to transition from one state to another. Currently, they rely on either synchronous or partially synchronous networks with leader-based coordination or costly Asynchronous Common Subset (ACS) protocols in asynchronous settings, making them impractical for large-scale asynchronous applications. To make Asynchronous SMR scalable, this paper proposes a emph{validated strong} BFT consensus model that allows leader-based coordination in asynchronous settings. Our BFT consensus model offers the same level of tolerance as binary byzantine agreement but does not demand consistency among honest nodes before they vote. An SMR using our model allows nodes to operate in different, tentative, but mutually exclusive states until they eventually converge on the same state. We propose an asynchronous BFT protocol for vote-based blockchains employing our consensus model to address several critical challenges: how to ensure that nodes eventually converge on the same state across voting rounds, how to assure that a blockchain will steadily progress through epochs while reaching consensus for previous epochs, and how to maintain robust byzantine fault tolerance. Our protocol greatly reduces message complexity and is the first one to achieve linear view changes without relying on threshold signatures. We prove that an asynchronous blockchain built on our protocol can operate with the emph{same} simplicity and efficiency as partially synchronous blockchains built on, e.g. HotStuff-2. This facilitates deploying asynchronous blockchains across large-scale networks.
Read more9/14/2024
0
Probabilistic Byzantine Fault Tolerance (Extended Version)
Diogo Avel~as, Hasan Heydari, Eduardo Alchieri, Tobias Distler, Alysson Bessani
Consensus is a fundamental building block for constructing reliable and fault-tolerant distributed services. Many Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus protocols designed for partially synchronous systems adopt a pessimistic approach when dealing with adversaries, ensuring safety in a deterministic way even under the worst-case scenarios that adversaries can create. Following this approach typically results in either an increase in the message complexity (e.g., PBFT) or an increase in the number of communication steps (e.g., HotStuff). In practice, however, adversaries are not as powerful as the ones assumed by these protocols. Furthermore, it might suffice to ensure safety and liveness properties with high probability. In order to accommodate more realistic and optimistic adversaries and improve the scalability of the BFT consensus, we propose ProBFT (Probabilistic Byzantine Fault Tolerance). ProBFT is a leader-based probabilistic consensus protocol with a message complexity of $O(nsqrt{n})$ and an optimal number of communication steps that tolerates Byzantine faults in permissioned partially synchronous systems. It is built on top of well-known primitives, such as probabilistic Byzantine quorums and verifiable random functions. ProBFT guarantees safety and liveness with high probabilities even with faulty leaders, as long as a supermajority of replicas is correct, and using only a fraction of messages employed in PBFT (e.g., $20%$). We provide a detailed description of ProBFT's protocol and its analysis.
Read more6/12/2024
⚙️
0
Resilient Consensus Sustained Collaboratively
Junchao Chen, Suyash Gupta, Alberto Sonnino, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Mohammad Sadoghi
Decentralized systems built around blockchain technology promise clients an immutable ledger. They add a transaction to the ledger after it undergoes consensus among the replicas that run a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) or Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) consensus protocol. Unfortunately, these protocols face a long-range attack where an adversary having access to the private keys of the replicas can rewrite the ledger. One solution is forcing each committed block from these protocols to undergo another consensus, Proof-of-Work(PoW) consensus; PoW protocol leads to wastage of computational resources as miners compete to solve complex puzzles. In this paper, we present the design of our Power-of-Collaboration (PoC) protocol, which guards existing PoS/BFT blockchains against long-range attacks and requires miners to collaborate rather than compete. PoC guarantees fairness and accountability and only marginally degrades the throughput of the underlying system.
Read more7/22/2024