Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Tree-of-Thoughts
2311.08097
0
0
📊
Abstract
Reasoning methods, best exemplified by the well-known Chain-of-Thought (CoT), empower the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by eliciting them to solve complex tasks in a step-by-step manner. Although they are achieving significant success, the ability to deliver multi-step reasoning remains limited to English because of the imbalance in the distribution of pre-training data, which makes other languages a barrier. In this paper, we propose Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT), a method for aligning Cross-lingual CoT reasoning across languages. The proposed method, through a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach, provides multi-step reasoning paths in different languages that, during the steps, lead to the final solution. Experimental evaluations show that our method significantly outperforms existing prompting methods by reducing the number of interactions and achieving state-of-the-art performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method called Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT) to enable multi-step reasoning in different languages for large language models (LLMs).
- The key idea is to use a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach to provide multi-step reasoning paths in different languages.
- The method aims to address the imbalance in pre-training data distribution across languages, which has limited the ability of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to English.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can tackle complex tasks. One way to improve their reasoning abilities is through a technique called Chain-of-Thought (CoT), which guides the model to solve problems step-by-step. However, CoT has mainly been successful in English, as the data used to train these models is heavily skewed towards that language.
To address this, the researchers developed a new method called Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT). The key idea is to use a special type of prompt that helps the model provide multi-step reasoning in different languages, not just English. This is achieved by leveraging a technique called Tree-of-Thoughts, which encourages the model to explore multiple reasoning paths.
By using Cross-ToT, the researchers were able to significantly improve the performance of LLMs on complex tasks across various languages, requiring fewer interactions to reach the correct solution compared to existing prompting methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a method called Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT) to enable multi-step reasoning in different languages for large language models (LLMs).
The core idea is to use a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach. This prompting technique provides multi-step reasoning paths in different languages, where each step in the reasoning process leads to the final solution.
The researchers conducted experimental evaluations to compare Cross-ToT with existing prompting methods. The results show that Cross-ToT significantly outperforms these methods by reducing the number of interactions required and achieving state-of-the-art performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper addresses an important challenge in the field of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, which has been largely limited to the English language due to the imbalance in pre-training data distribution across languages.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on evaluating the method on a relatively small set of tasks and languages. It would be valuable to see how Cross-ToT performs on a wider range of complex reasoning tasks and a more diverse set of languages.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational and memory requirements of the Cross-ToT approach compared to other prompting techniques. This information would be useful for researchers and practitioners to assess the practical feasibility and scalability of the method.
Overall, the Cross-ToT method represents a promising step towards enabling multi-step reasoning in LLMs across different languages. However, further research is needed to fully understand the capabilities, limitations, and broader implications of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new method called Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT) that aims to address the language imbalance in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning for large language models (LLMs). By leveraging a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach, the method can provide multi-step reasoning paths in different languages, leading to significant improvements in performance compared to existing prompting techniques.
The development of Cross-ToT represents an important step towards making complex reasoning capabilities more accessible across a wider range of languages, which could have far-reaching implications for the development and deployment of advanced AI systems in diverse global contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models
Yu Shang, Yu Li, Fengli Xu, Yong Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but still face challenges in handling complex reasoning problems. Previous works like chain-of-thought (CoT) and tree-of-thoughts (ToT) have predominately focused on enhancing accuracy, but overlook the rapidly increasing token cost, which could be particularly problematic for open-ended real-world tasks with huge solution spaces. Motivated by the dual process theory of human cognition, we propose Synergy of Thoughts (SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs for efficient reasoning. By default, SoT uses smaller-scale language models to generate multiple low-cost reasoning thoughts, which resembles the parallel intuitions produced by System 1. If these intuitions exhibit conflicts, SoT will invoke the reflective reasoning of scaled-up language models to emulate the intervention of System 2, which will override the intuitive thoughts and rectify the reasoning process. This framework is model-agnostic and training-free, which can be flexibly implemented with various off-the-shelf LLMs. Experiments on six representative reasoning tasks show that SoT substantially reduces the token cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity. Notably, the average token cost reduction on open-ended tasks reaches up to 69.1%. Code repo with all prompts will be released upon publication.
5/24/2024
On the Empirical Complexity of Reasoning and Planning in LLMs
Liwei Kang, Zirui Zhao, David Hsu, Wee Sun Lee
0
0
Chain-of-thought (CoT), tree-of-thought (ToT), and related techniques work surprisingly well in practice for some complex reasoning tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs), but why? This work seeks the underlying reasons by conducting experimental case studies and linking the performance benefits to well-established sample and computational complexity principles in machine learning. We experimented with 6 reasoning tasks, ranging from grade school math, air travel planning, ..., to Blocksworld. The results suggest that (i) both CoT and ToT benefit significantly from task decomposition, which breaks a complex reasoning task into a sequence of steps with low sample complexity and explicitly outlines the reasoning structure, and (ii) for computationally hard reasoning tasks, the more sophisticated tree structure of ToT outperforms the linear structure of CoT. These findings provide useful guidelines for the use of LLM in solving reasoning tasks in practice.
6/19/2024
💬
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, Alex Smola
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex reasoning by leveraging chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to generate intermediate reasoning chains as the rationale to infer the answer. However, existing CoT studies have primarily focused on the language modality. We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework that separates rationale generation and answer inference. In this way, answer inference can leverage better generated rationales that are based on multimodal information. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. With Multimodal-CoT, our model under 1 billion parameters achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark. Our analysis indicates that Multimodal-CoT offers the advantages of mitigating hallucination and enhancing convergence speed. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/mm-cot.
5/21/2024
🤔
How to think step-by-step: A mechanistic understanding of chain-of-thought reasoning
Subhabrata Dutta, Joykirat Singh, Soumen Chakrabarti, Tanmoy Chakraborty
0
0
Despite superior reasoning prowess demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a lack of understanding prevails around the internal mechanisms of the models that facilitate CoT generation. This work investigates the neural sub-structures within LLMs that manifest CoT reasoning from a mechanistic point of view. From an analysis of Llama-2 7B applied to multistep reasoning over fictional ontologies, we demonstrate that LLMs deploy multiple parallel pathways of answer generation for step-by-step reasoning. These parallel pathways provide sequential answers from the input question context as well as the generated CoT. We observe a functional rift in the middle layers of the LLM. Token representations in the initial half remain strongly biased towards the pretraining prior, with the in-context prior taking over in the later half. This internal phase shift manifests in different functional components: attention heads that write the answer token appear in the later half, attention heads that move information along ontological relationships appear in the initial half, and so on. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt towards mechanistic investigation of CoT reasoning in LLMs.
5/7/2024