Restless Linear Bandits

Read original: arXiv:2405.10817 - Published 5/20/2024 by Azadeh Khaleghi
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the "restless linear bandit" problem, where an agent must make decisions over time to maximize their cumulative rewards, but the environment can change in unpredictable ways.
  • The authors propose a new algorithm called "Restless Linear Thompson Sampling (RLTS)" that can effectively navigate this challenging setup.
  • The paper analyzes the theoretical properties of RLTS and demonstrates its empirical performance on several benchmark tasks.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world decision-making scenarios, the environment is constantly changing in unpredictable ways. For example, a company may need to decide how to allocate its marketing budget across different advertising channels, but the effectiveness of those channels can shift over time as consumer preferences evolve. This type of problem is known as the "restless linear bandit" problem.

The Restless Linear Bandits paper tackles this challenging setup by proposing a new algorithm called "Restless Linear Thompson Sampling (RLTS)." The key idea behind RLTS is to maintain a probabilistic model of the environment and use this model to guide the agent's decision-making.

Rather than trying to perfectly predict the future, RLTS acknowledges the inherent uncertainty and explores different options in a principled way. This allows the agent to quickly adapt to changes in the environment and maximize its cumulative rewards over time.

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of RLTS, demonstrating its strong performance guarantees. It also presents empirical results showing that RLTS outperforms other state-of-the-art algorithms on a variety of benchmark tasks, including nonstationary reinforcement learning with linear function approximation and provably efficient reinforcement learning in adversarial restless multi-armed bandits.

Technical Explanation

The Restless Linear Bandits paper formalizes the "restless linear bandit" problem, where a decision-making agent must choose actions over time to maximize their cumulative rewards, but the environment can change in unpredictable ways.

Specifically, the agent has access to a set of arms (actions), each of which has a linear reward function. The agent's goal is to choose which arm to pull at each time step to maximize their total rewards. However, the parameters of the linear reward functions can change over time in an arbitrary (adversarial) manner, making the problem challenging.

The authors propose a new algorithm called "Restless Linear Thompson Sampling (RLTS)" to address this problem. RLTS maintains a Bayesian posterior distribution over the unknown reward function parameters and uses this distribution to guide the agent's decision-making. At each time step, RLTS samples from the posterior distribution, chooses the arm that maximizes the expected reward under the sampled parameters, and then updates the posterior based on the observed reward.

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of RLTS, showing that it achieves improved bounds on robust causal bandits with linear models and enjoys strong regret guarantees even in the face of adversarial changes to the environment. The authors also demonstrate the empirical performance of RLTS on several benchmark tasks, including nonstationary reinforcement learning with linear function approximation and provably efficient reinforcement learning in adversarial restless multi-armed bandits.

Critical Analysis

The Restless Linear Bandits paper presents a compelling approach to the challenging restless linear bandit problem. The authors' RLTS algorithm is theoretically sound and empirically effective, outperforming other state-of-the-art methods on benchmark tasks.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it assumes the reward functions have a linear structure. While this is a reasonable assumption in many real-world scenarios, there may be cases where the true reward functions have a more complex, nonlinear form. Extending the RLTS algorithm to handle nonlinear reward functions could be an interesting direction for future research.

Additionally, the theoretical analysis in the paper relies on several assumptions, such as the changes in the environment being bounded and the initial uncertainty about the reward function parameters being sufficiently small. It would be valuable to explore how the algorithm performs under more relaxed assumptions or in the presence of more severe environmental changes.

Overall, the Restless Linear Bandits paper makes a significant contribution to the field of reinforcement learning and decision-making under uncertainty. The RLTS algorithm presented in the paper could have important practical applications in areas like nonstationary reinforcement learning with linear function approximation, provably efficient reinforcement learning in adversarial restless multi-armed bandits, and improved bounds on robust causal bandits with linear models.

Conclusion

The Restless Linear Bandits paper introduces a new algorithm called Restless Linear Thompson Sampling (RLTS) to address the challenging problem of decision-making in environments with unpredictable changes. The authors provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of RLTS and demonstrate its strong empirical performance on several benchmark tasks.

The key contribution of this work is the development of a principled approach for navigating restless environments, where the reward functions can shift over time in adversarial ways. By maintaining a probabilistic model of the environment and using it to guide the agent's decision-making, RLTS can quickly adapt to changes and maximize cumulative rewards.

The findings in this paper have important implications for a wide range of real-world applications, from marketing and advertising to resource allocation and portfolio management. As the complexity and dynamism of our environments continue to increase, the ability to make robust, adaptive decisions will become increasingly crucial. The Restless Linear Bandits paper represents a significant step forward in this direction.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Restless Linear Bandits

Azadeh Khaleghi

A more general formulation of the linear bandit problem is considered to allow for dependencies over time. Specifically, it is assumed that there exists an unknown $mathbb{R}^d$-valued stationary $varphi$-mixing sequence of parameters $(theta_t,~t in mathbb{N})$ which gives rise to pay-offs. This instance of the problem can be viewed as a generalization of both the classical linear bandits with iid noise, and the finite-armed restless bandits. In light of the well-known computational hardness of optimal policies for restless bandits, an approximation is proposed whose error is shown to be controlled by the $varphi$-dependence between consecutive $theta_t$. An optimistic algorithm, called LinMix-UCB, is proposed for the case where $theta_t$ has an exponential mixing rate. The proposed algorithm is shown to incur a sub-linear regret of $mathcal{O}left(sqrt{d nmathrm{polylog}(n) }right)$ with respect to an oracle that always plays a multiple of $mathbb{E}theta_t$. The main challenge in this setting is to ensure that the exploration-exploitation strategy is robust against long-range dependencies. The proposed method relies on Berbee's coupling lemma to carefully select near-independent samples and construct confidence ellipsoids around empirical estimates of $mathbb{E}theta_t$.

Read more

5/20/2024

Restless Bandit Problem with Rewards Generated by a Linear Gaussian Dynamical System
Total Score

0

Restless Bandit Problem with Rewards Generated by a Linear Gaussian Dynamical System

Jonathan Gornet, Bruno Sinopoli

Decision-making under uncertainty is a fundamental problem encountered frequently and can be formulated as a stochastic multi-armed bandit problem. In the problem, the learner interacts with an environment by choosing an action at each round, where a round is an instance of an interaction. In response, the environment reveals a reward, which is sampled from a stochastic process, to the learner. The goal of the learner is to maximize cumulative reward. In this work, we assume that the rewards are the inner product of an action vector and a state vector generated by a linear Gaussian dynamical system. To predict the reward for each action, we propose a method that takes a linear combination of previously observed rewards for predicting each action's next reward. We show that, regardless of the sequence of previous actions chosen, the reward sampled for any previously chosen action can be used for predicting another action's future reward, i.e. the reward sampled for action 1 at round $t-1$ can be used for predicting the reward for action $2$ at round $t$. This is accomplished by designing a modified Kalman filter with a matrix representation that can be learned for reward prediction. Numerical evaluations are carried out on a set of linear Gaussian dynamical systems and are compared with 2 other well-known stochastic multi-armed bandit algorithms.

Read more

5/24/2024

Bayesian Bandit Algorithms with Approximate Inference in Stochastic Linear Bandits
Total Score

0

Bayesian Bandit Algorithms with Approximate Inference in Stochastic Linear Bandits

Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang

Bayesian bandit algorithms with approximate Bayesian inference have been widely used in real-world applications. Nevertheless, their theoretical justification is less investigated in the literature, especially for contextual bandit problems. To fill this gap, we propose a general theoretical framework to analyze stochastic linear bandits in the presence of approximate inference and conduct regret analysis on two Bayesian bandit algorithms, Linear Thompson sampling (LinTS) and the extension of Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound, namely Linear Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound (LinBUCB). We demonstrate that both LinTS and LinBUCB can preserve their original rates of regret upper bound but with a sacrifice of larger constant terms when applied with approximate inference. These results hold for general Bayesian inference approaches, under the assumption that the inference error measured by two different $alpha$-divergences is bounded. Additionally, by introducing a new definition of well-behaved distributions, we show that LinBUCB improves the regret rate of LinTS from $tilde{O}(d^{3/2}sqrt{T})$ to $tilde{O}(dsqrt{T})$, matching the minimax optimal rate. To our knowledge, this work provides the first regret bounds in the setting of stochastic linear bandits with bounded approximate inference errors.

Read more

6/21/2024

🌀

Total Score

0

Blocking Bandits

Soumya Basu, Rajat Sen, Sujay Sanghavi, Sanjay Shakkottai

We consider a novel stochastic multi-armed bandit setting, where playing an arm makes it unavailable for a fixed number of time slots thereafter. This models situations where reusing an arm too often is undesirable (e.g. making the same product recommendation repeatedly) or infeasible (e.g. compute job scheduling on machines). We show that with prior knowledge of the rewards and delays of all the arms, the problem of optimizing cumulative reward does not admit any pseudo-polynomial time algorithm (in the number of arms) unless randomized exponential time hypothesis is false, by mapping to the PINWHEEL scheduling problem. Subsequently, we show that a simple greedy algorithm that plays the available arm with the highest reward is asymptotically $(1-1/e)$ optimal. When the rewards are unknown, we design a UCB based algorithm which is shown to have $c log T + o(log T)$ cumulative regret against the greedy algorithm, leveraging the free exploration of arms due to the unavailability. Finally, when all the delays are equal the problem reduces to Combinatorial Semi-bandits providing us with a lower bound of $c' log T+ omega(log T)$.

Read more

7/31/2024