Resurrecting Label Propagation for Graphs with Heterophily and Label Noise
2310.16560
0
0
Abstract
Label noise is a common challenge in large datasets, as it can significantly degrade the generalization ability of deep neural networks. Most existing studies focus on noisy labels in computer vision; however, graph models encompass both node features and graph topology as input, and become more susceptible to label noise through message-passing mechanisms. Recently, only a few works have been proposed to tackle the label noise on graphs. One significant limitation is that they operate under the assumption that the graph exhibits homophily and that the labels are distributed smoothly. However, real-world graphs can exhibit varying degrees of heterophily, or even be dominated by heterophily, which results in the inadequacy of the current methods. In this paper, we study graph label noise in the context of arbitrary heterophily, with the aim of rectifying noisy labels and assigning labels to previously unlabeled nodes. We begin by conducting two empirical analyses to explore the impact of graph homophily on graph label noise. Following observations, we propose a efficient algorithm, denoted as $R^{2}LP$. Specifically, $R^{2}LP$ is an iterative algorithm with three steps: (1) reconstruct the graph to recover the homophily property, (2) utilize label propagation to rectify the noisy labels, (3) select high-confidence labels to retain for the next iteration. By iterating these steps, we obtain a set of correct labels, ultimately achieving high accuracy in the node classification task. The theoretical analysis is also provided to demonstrate its remarkable denoising effect. Finally, we perform experiments on ten benchmark datasets with different levels of graph heterophily and various types of noise. In these experiments, we compare the performance of $R^{2}LP$ against ten typical baseline methods. Our results illustrate the superior performance of the proposed $R^{2}LP$.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the impact of homophily, a property where connected nodes in a graph are more likely to have similar labels, on graph label noise.
- The authors investigate how homophily can influence the effectiveness of label propagation, a common approach for addressing noisy labels in graph data.
- The paper provides a detailed analysis of the relationship between homophily and graph label noise, offering insights that can inform the development of more robust graph learning algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world datasets, such as social networks or biological networks, the labels or attributes associated with the nodes (e.g., user interests, protein functions) may be noisy or inaccurate. This can happen for a variety of reasons, like human error or incomplete information. Understanding the impact of heterophilic structures on graph positive-unlabeled learning and Rethinking the impact of noisy labels for graph classification have explored this problem in the context of graph neural networks.
One common approach to addressing noisy labels is label propagation, where the label information is spread through the connections in the graph. However, the effectiveness of label propagation can be heavily influenced by the level of homophily in the graph, which refers to the tendency for connected nodes to have similar labels.
This paper dives deeper into the relationship between homophily and graph label noise. The authors demonstrate that when homophily is high, label propagation can be a powerful tool for cleaning up noisy labels. But when homophily is low (a property known as heterophily), label propagation becomes much less effective.
The key insight is that homophily acts as a kind of "amplifier" for label propagation. If the graph has high homophily, then the correct labels will tend to spread through the connections, allowing the algorithm to converge on the true labels even in the presence of noise. But in heterophilic graphs, the noisy labels get propagated just as readily, making it harder for the algorithm to recover the true labels.
This research highlights the importance of understanding the underlying properties of the graph data, like the degree of homophily, when designing algorithms to handle noisy labels. It suggests that more sophisticated approaches may be needed to effectively clean up label noise in heterophilic graphs, compared to the homophilic case.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of graph label noise, where the labels associated with nodes in a graph dataset may be inaccurate or incomplete. The authors note that this is a common issue in real-world applications, and that addressing label noise is an important challenge in graph learning.
One popular approach to dealing with graph label noise is label propagation, which involves spreading label information through the connections in the graph. The intuition is that if two nodes are connected, they are likely to have similar labels. By iteratively propagating label information, the algorithm can "clean up" noisy labels.
However, the effectiveness of label propagation is heavily dependent on the level of homophily in the graph. Homophily refers to the tendency for connected nodes to have similar labels. When homophily is high, label propagation can be very effective, as the correct labels will tend to spread through the graph.
But when homophily is low (a property known as heterophily), label propagation becomes much less effective. In this case, the noisy labels can propagate just as readily as the correct labels, making it harder for the algorithm to converge on the true labels.
The key contribution of this paper is a detailed analysis of the relationship between homophily and graph label noise. The authors show that homophily acts as a kind of "amplifier" for label propagation - when homophily is high, label propagation can be a powerful tool for cleaning up noisy labels, but when homophily is low, label propagation becomes much less effective.
The paper includes experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets to validate these findings. The authors demonstrate that the level of homophily has a significant impact on the performance of label propagation algorithms in the presence of noisy labels.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the relationship between homophily and graph label noise, and the implications for label propagation algorithms. The authors have clearly done a thorough job in both the theoretical analysis and the experimental validation of their findings.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on the label propagation approach, and does not explore how other graph learning algorithms might be impacted by homophily and label noise. It would be interesting to see a more comprehensive study that examines a wider range of methods, such as graph neural networks or graph positive-unlabeled learning techniques.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential strategies for addressing label noise in heterophilic graphs, beyond the limitations of label propagation. Further research could investigate more sophisticated approaches that are better equipped to handle noisy labels in low-homophily settings.
Overall, this is a well-designed and insightful study that contributes valuable insights to the field of graph learning. The findings highlight the importance of understanding the underlying graph properties when developing algorithms to handle noisy labels, and the paper serves as a useful reference for researchers and practitioners working in this area.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the impact of homophily on graph label noise and the effectiveness of label propagation algorithms. The key takeaway is that homophily acts as a crucial factor in determining the performance of label propagation - when homophily is high, label propagation can be a powerful tool for cleaning up noisy labels, but when homophily is low, the approach becomes much less effective.
These insights have important implications for the design of graph learning algorithms. They suggest that the underlying properties of the graph data, such as the degree of homophily, need to be carefully considered when choosing and tuning methods for handling noisy labels. This research can help guide the development of more robust and effective graph learning techniques, with applications across a wide range of domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Heterophilous Distribution Propagation for Graph Neural Networks
Zhuonan Zheng, Sheng Zhou, Hongjia Xu, Ming Gu, Yilun Xu, Ao Li, Yuhong Li, Jingjun Gu, Jiajun Bu
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable success in various graph mining tasks by aggregating information from neighborhoods for representation learning. The success relies on the homophily assumption that nearby nodes exhibit similar behaviors, while it may be violated in many real-world graphs. Recently, heterophilous graph neural networks (HeterGNNs) have attracted increasing attention by modifying the neural message passing schema for heterophilous neighborhoods. However, they suffer from insufficient neighborhood partition and heterophily modeling, both of which are critical but challenging to break through. To tackle these challenges, in this paper, we propose heterophilous distribution propagation (HDP) for graph neural networks. Instead of aggregating information from all neighborhoods, HDP adaptively separates the neighbors into homophilous and heterphilous parts based on the pseudo assignments during training. The heterophilous neighborhood distribution is learned with orthogonality-oriented constraint via a trusted prototype contrastive learning paradigm. Both the homophilous and heterophilous patterns are propagated with a novel semantic-aware message passing mechanism. We conduct extensive experiments on 9 benchmark datasets with different levels of homophily. Experimental results show that our method outperforms representative baselines on heterophilous datasets.
6/3/2024
Rethinking the impact of noisy labels in graph classification: A utility and privacy perspective
De Li, Xianxian Li, Zeming Gan, Qiyu Li, Bin Qu, Jinyan Wang
0
0
Graph neural networks based on message-passing mechanisms have achieved advanced results in graph classification tasks. However, their generalization performance degrades when noisy labels are present in the training data. Most existing noisy labeling approaches focus on the visual domain or graph node classification tasks and analyze the impact of noisy labels only from a utility perspective. Unlike existing work, in this paper, we measure the effects of noise labels on graph classification from data privacy and model utility perspectives. We find that noise labels degrade the model's generalization performance and enhance the ability of membership inference attacks on graph data privacy. To this end, we propose the robust graph neural network approach with noisy labeled graph classification. Specifically, we first accurately filter the noisy samples by high-confidence samples and the first feature principal component vector of each class. Then, the robust principal component vectors and the model output under data augmentation are utilized to achieve noise label correction guided by dual spatial information. Finally, supervised graph contrastive learning is introduced to enhance the embedding quality of the model and protect the privacy of the training graph data. The utility and privacy of the proposed method are validated by comparing twelve different methods on eight real graph classification datasets. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods, the RGLC method achieves at most and at least 7.8% and 0.8% performance gain at 30% noisy labeling rate, respectively, and reduces the accuracy of privacy attacks to below 60%.
6/12/2024
Unraveling the Impact of Heterophilic Structures on Graph Positive-Unlabeled Learning
Yuhao Wu, Jiangchao Yao, Bo Han, Lina Yao, Tongliang Liu
0
0
While Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning is vital in many real-world scenarios, its application to graph data still remains under-explored. We unveil that a critical challenge for PU learning on graph lies on the edge heterophily, which directly violates the irreducibility assumption for Class-Prior Estimation (class prior is essential for building PU learning algorithms) and degenerates the latent label inference on unlabeled nodes during classifier training. In response to this challenge, we introduce a new method, named Graph PU Learning with Label Propagation Loss (GPL). Specifically, GPL considers learning from PU nodes along with an intermediate heterophily reduction, which helps mitigate the negative impact of the heterophilic structure. We formulate this procedure as a bilevel optimization that reduces heterophily in the inner loop and efficiently learns a classifier in the outer loop. Extensive experiments across a variety of datasets have shown that GPL significantly outperforms baseline methods, confirming its effectiveness and superiority.
6/4/2024
Understanding Heterophily for Graph Neural Networks
Junfu Wang, Yuanfang Guo, Liang Yang, Yunhong Wang
0
0
Graphs with heterophily have been regarded as challenging scenarios for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), where nodes are connected with dissimilar neighbors through various patterns. In this paper, we present theoretical understandings of the impacts of different heterophily patterns for GNNs by incorporating the graph convolution (GC) operations into fully connected networks via the proposed Heterophilous Stochastic Block Models (HSBM), a general random graph model that can accommodate diverse heterophily patterns. Firstly, we show that by applying a GC operation, the separability gains are determined by two factors, i.e., the Euclidean distance of the neighborhood distributions and $sqrt{mathbb{E}left[operatorname{deg}right]}$, where $mathbb{E}left[operatorname{deg}right]$ is the averaged node degree. It reveals that the impact of heterophily on classification needs to be evaluated alongside the averaged node degree. Secondly, we show that the topological noise has a detrimental impact on separability, which is equivalent to degrading $mathbb{E}left[operatorname{deg}right]$. Finally, when applying multiple GC operations, we show that the separability gains are determined by the normalized distance of the $l$-powered neighborhood distributions. It indicates that the nodes still possess separability as $l$ goes to infinity in a wide range of regimes. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data verify the effectiveness of our theory.
6/5/2024