Understanding Heterophily for Graph Neural Networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Introduction
The provided paper examines the concept of heterophily, which refers to the tendency of nodes in a graph network to connect with dissimilar or different nodes, rather than similar ones (homophily). This is an important consideration for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), which are a type of machine learning model used to analyze and make predictions on graph-structured data.
Preliminaries
The paper first introduces the basics of graph neural networks and the idea of homophily versus heterophily in graph data. Homophily is the principle that nodes tend to connect with other nodes that are similar to them, while heterophily is the opposite - nodes connecting with dissimilar nodes. Understanding these underlying data characteristics is crucial for the effective application of GNNs.
Proposed Data Models
Assumptions
The paper proposes several data models to capture different aspects of heterophily in graph data. These models make certain assumptions about the structure and properties of the graph network.
Plain English Explanation
The key idea of this paper is to better understand how the presence of heterophily, rather than just homophily, affects the performance of graph neural networks. Homophily is the tendency for nodes to connect to similar nodes, while heterophily is the tendency to connect to dissimilar nodes.
The researchers developed several mathematical models to represent different types of heterophily in graph data. These models make certain assumptions about the structure and properties of the graph network. By studying how GNNs perform on these heterophilous graph models, the researchers hope to gain insights that can improve the design and application of GNNs for real-world datasets that may exhibit heterophily.
Understanding heterophily is important because many real-world networks, such as social networks, biological networks, and communication networks, do not always display strong homophily. Developing GNN techniques that can handle heterophily could lead to better performance on a wider range of graph-structured data.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several data models to capture different aspects of heterophily in graph data. These models make certain assumptions about the structure and properties of the graph network:
-
Stochastic Block Model (SBM): This model generates a graph with pre-defined community structure and heterophilic/homophilic connections between communities.
-
Node Feature Heterophily (NFH): This model generates a graph where node features are correlated with the graph structure, creating heterophilic connections.
-
Edge Feature Heterophily (EFH): This model generates a graph where edge features are correlated with the graph structure, creating heterophilic connections.
By studying how GNNs perform on these heterophilous graph models, the researchers aim to gain insights that can inform the design and application of GNNs for real-world datasets that may exhibit heterophily.
Critical Analysis
The proposed data models provide a useful framework for studying the effects of heterophily on GNN performance. However, the authors acknowledge that these models may not capture all the complexities of real-world graph data. Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of GNN architectures and their suitability for handling heterophily.
Further research is needed to explore more realistic and diverse models of heterophily, as well as to develop GNN techniques that can robustly handle a wide range of heterophilic graph structures. Incorporating insights from this paper, along with continued investigation into the interplay between graph data characteristics and GNN design, could lead to significant advancements in the field of graph representation learning.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important step towards understanding the impact of heterophily on graph neural networks. By proposing various data models to capture different aspects of heterophily, the researchers aim to provide a foundation for studying GNN performance in heterophilous settings. The insights gained from this work could inform the development of more effective GNN architectures and techniques for a broader range of graph-structured data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding Heterophily for Graph Neural Networks
Junfu Wang, Yuanfang Guo, Liang Yang, Yunhong Wang
Graphs with heterophily have been regarded as challenging scenarios for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), where nodes are connected with dissimilar neighbors through various patterns. In this paper, we present theoretical understandings of the impacts of different heterophily patterns for GNNs by incorporating the graph convolution (GC) operations into fully connected networks via the proposed Heterophilous Stochastic Block Models (HSBM), a general random graph model that can accommodate diverse heterophily patterns. Firstly, we show that by applying a GC operation, the separability gains are determined by two factors, i.e., the Euclidean distance of the neighborhood distributions and $sqrt{mathbb{E}left[operatorname{deg}right]}$, where $mathbb{E}left[operatorname{deg}right]$ is the averaged node degree. It reveals that the impact of heterophily on classification needs to be evaluated alongside the averaged node degree. Secondly, we show that the topological noise has a detrimental impact on separability, which is equivalent to degrading $mathbb{E}left[operatorname{deg}right]$. Finally, when applying multiple GC operations, we show that the separability gains are determined by the normalized distance of the $l$-powered neighborhood distributions. It indicates that the nodes still possess separability as $l$ goes to infinity in a wide range of regimes. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data verify the effectiveness of our theory.
Read more6/5/2024
🧠
0
Incorporating Heterophily into Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classification
Jiayi Yang, Sourav Medya, Wei Ye
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) often assume strong homophily for graph classification, seldom considering heterophily, which means connected nodes tend to have different class labels and dissimilar features. In real-world scenarios, graphs may have nodes that exhibit both homophily and heterophily. Failing to generalize to this setting makes many GNNs underperform in graph classification. In this paper, we address this limitation by identifying three effective designs and develop a novel GNN architecture called IHGNN (short for Incorporating Heterophily into Graph Neural Networks). These designs include the combination of integration and separation of the ego- and neighbor-embeddings of nodes, adaptive aggregation of node embeddings from different layers, and differentiation between different node embeddings for constructing the graph-level readout function. We empirically validate IHGNN on various graph datasets and demonstrate that it outperforms the state-of-the-art GNNs for graph classification.
Read more5/10/2024
0
Heterophilous Distribution Propagation for Graph Neural Networks
Zhuonan Zheng, Sheng Zhou, Hongjia Xu, Ming Gu, Yilun Xu, Ao Li, Yuhong Li, Jingjun Gu, Jiajun Bu
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable success in various graph mining tasks by aggregating information from neighborhoods for representation learning. The success relies on the homophily assumption that nearby nodes exhibit similar behaviors, while it may be violated in many real-world graphs. Recently, heterophilous graph neural networks (HeterGNNs) have attracted increasing attention by modifying the neural message passing schema for heterophilous neighborhoods. However, they suffer from insufficient neighborhood partition and heterophily modeling, both of which are critical but challenging to break through. To tackle these challenges, in this paper, we propose heterophilous distribution propagation (HDP) for graph neural networks. Instead of aggregating information from all neighborhoods, HDP adaptively separates the neighbors into homophilous and heterphilous parts based on the pseudo assignments during training. The heterophilous neighborhood distribution is learned with orthogonality-oriented constraint via a trusted prototype contrastive learning paradigm. Both the homophilous and heterophilous patterns are propagated with a novel semantic-aware message passing mechanism. We conduct extensive experiments on 9 benchmark datasets with different levels of homophily. Experimental results show that our method outperforms representative baselines on heterophilous datasets.
Read more6/3/2024
0
The Heterophilic Graph Learning Handbook: Benchmarks, Models, Theoretical Analysis, Applications and Challenges
Sitao Luan, Chenqing Hua, Qincheng Lu, Liheng Ma, Lirong Wu, Xinyu Wang, Minkai Xu, Xiao-Wen Chang, Doina Precup, Rex Ying, Stan Z. Li, Jian Tang, Guy Wolf, Stefanie Jegelka
Homophily principle, ie{} nodes with the same labels or similar attributes are more likely to be connected, has been commonly believed to be the main reason for the superiority of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) over traditional Neural Networks (NNs) on graph-structured data, especially on node-level tasks. However, recent work has identified a non-trivial set of datasets where GNN's performance compared to the NN's is not satisfactory. Heterophily, i.e. low homophily, has been considered the main cause of this empirical observation. People have begun to revisit and re-evaluate most existing graph models, including graph transformer and its variants, in the heterophily scenario across various kinds of graphs, e.g. heterogeneous graphs, temporal graphs and hypergraphs. Moreover, numerous graph-related applications are found to be closely related to the heterophily problem. In the past few years, considerable effort has been devoted to studying and addressing the heterophily issue. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the latest progress on heterophilic graph learning, including an extensive summary of benchmark datasets and evaluation of homophily metrics on synthetic graphs, meticulous classification of the most updated supervised and unsupervised learning methods, thorough digestion of the theoretical analysis on homophily/heterophily, and broad exploration of the heterophily-related applications. Notably, through detailed experiments, we are the first to categorize benchmark heterophilic datasets into three sub-categories: malignant, benign and ambiguous heterophily. Malignant and ambiguous datasets are identified as the real challenging datasets to test the effectiveness of new models on the heterophily challenge. Finally, we propose several challenges and future directions for heterophilic graph representation learning.
Read more7/16/2024