Review of Data-centric Time Series Analysis from Sample, Feature, and Period

Read original: arXiv:2404.16886 - Published 4/29/2024 by Chenxi Sun, Hongyan Li, Yaliang Li, Shenda Hong

✨

Overview

Data is essential for time series analysis using machine learning
Good time series datasets lead to more accurate, robust, and efficient models
Data-centric AI is a shift from model refinement to prioritizing data quality
Time series data processing is an important but understudied topic

Plain English Explanation

When it comes to using machine learning for time series analysis, having high-quality data is crucial. A good time series dataset can help a model be more accurate, reliable, and efficient in its predictions. This is especially important as the field of data-centric AI has emerged, which focuses on improving the data itself rather than just refining the model.

Although time series data processing is widely used in many different research areas, it hasn't been studied in depth as its own specialized topic. This paper aims to fill that gap by systematically reviewing various data-centric methods used in time series analysis. The authors propose a way to categorize these data selection methods based on the characteristics of the time series data, such as the samples, features, and time periods.

In addition to describing the different data-centric approaches and their pros and cons for working with time series data, the paper also discusses the challenges and opportunities in this area. The authors provide recommendations for future research and identify open problems that still need to be addressed.

Technical Explanation

This paper presents a comprehensive review of data-centric methods used in time series analysis and time series classification. The authors propose a taxonomy to categorize the various data selection techniques based on the characteristics of the time series data, such as the individual samples, the features, and the time periods.

For each data-centric approach, the paper discusses its key features, benefits, and drawbacks in the context of time series applications. This includes methods like data augmentation, feature engineering, and task-specific data selection. The authors also highlight the challenges and opportunities in this research area, such as the need for better evaluation metrics and the potential of self-supervised learning for time series data.

Additionally, the paper covers emerging topics like the integration of large language models into time series analysis and the role of diffusion models for time series and spatiotemporal data.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-structured review of data-centric methods in time series analysis, which is a valuable contribution to the field. However, the authors acknowledge that their taxonomy and the coverage of different techniques may not be exhaustive, as this is an active and rapidly evolving area of research.

One potential limitation is that the paper focuses more on the characteristics of the data itself, rather than the specific machine learning tasks or applications where these data-centric methods are employed. It would be useful to have a deeper discussion on how the choice of data-centric approach may be influenced by the particular time series problem being solved.

Additionally, while the paper highlights the challenges and opportunities in this research area, it could have delved deeper into the practical implications and the real-world challenges faced by researchers and practitioners when implementing these data-centric techniques. Exploring case studies or examples from various domains could have provided more context and insights.

Overall, this paper serves as an excellent starting point for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding the role of data in time series analysis. By encouraging critical thinking and further exploration, it sets the stage for continued advancements in this important field.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of data-centric methods used in time series analysis, an area that is crucial for the development of accurate and reliable machine learning models. By proposing a taxonomy to categorize these techniques based on the characteristics of the time series data, the authors have created a valuable framework for understanding and evaluating different data-centric approaches.

The insights and recommendations presented in this paper have the potential to guide future research and help practitioners make more informed decisions when working with time series data. As the field of data-centric AI continues to evolve, this review serves as an important resource for the broader machine learning community to better leverage data quality and selection for time series applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

✨

Review of Data-centric Time Series Analysis from Sample, Feature, and Period

Chenxi Sun, Hongyan Li, Yaliang Li, Shenda Hong

Data is essential to performing time series analysis utilizing machine learning approaches, whether for classic models or today's large language models. A good time-series dataset is advantageous for the model's accuracy, robustness, and convergence, as well as task outcomes and costs. The emergence of data-centric AI represents a shift in the landscape from model refinement to prioritizing data quality. Even though time-series data processing methods frequently come up in a wide range of research fields, it hasn't been well investigated as a specific topic. To fill the gap, in this paper, we systematically review different data-centric methods in time series analysis, covering a wide range of research topics. Based on the time-series data characteristics at sample, feature, and period, we propose a taxonomy for the reviewed data selection methods. In addition to discussing and summarizing their characteristics, benefits, and drawbacks targeting time-series data, we also introduce the challenges and opportunities by proposing recommendations, open problems, and possible research topics.

4/29/2024

Survey and Taxonomy: The Role of Data-Centric AI in Transformer-Based Time Series Forecasting

Jingjing Xu, Caesar Wu, Yuan-Fang Li, Gregoire Danoy, Pascal Bouvry

Alongside the continuous process of improving AI performance through the development of more sophisticated models, researchers have also focused their attention to the emerging concept of data-centric AI, which emphasizes the important role of data in a systematic machine learning training process. Nonetheless, the development of models has also continued apace. One result of this progress is the development of the Transformer Architecture, which possesses a high level of capability in multiple domains such as Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computer Vision (CV) and Time Series Forecasting (TSF). Its performance is, however, heavily dependent on input data preprocessing and output data evaluation, justifying a data-centric approach to future research. We argue that data-centric AI is essential for training AI models, particularly for transformer-based TSF models efficiently. However, there is a gap regarding the integration of transformer-based TSF and data-centric AI. This survey aims to pin down this gap via the extensive literature review based on the proposed taxonomy. We review the previous research works from a data-centric AI perspective and we intend to lay the foundation work for the future development of transformer-based architecture and data-centric AI.

7/30/2024

A Data-Centric Perspective on Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Tabular Data

Andrej Tschalzev, Sascha Marton, Stefan Ludtke, Christian Bartelt, Heiner Stuckenschmidt

Tabular data is prevalent in real-world machine learning applications, and new models for supervised learning of tabular data are frequently proposed. Comparative studies assessing the performance of models typically consist of model-centric evaluation setups with overly standardized data preprocessing. This paper demonstrates that such model-centric evaluations are biased, as real-world modeling pipelines often require dataset-specific preprocessing and feature engineering. Therefore, we propose a data-centric evaluation framework. We select 10 relevant datasets from Kaggle competitions and implement expert-level preprocessing pipelines for each dataset. We conduct experiments with different preprocessing pipelines and hyperparameter optimization (HPO) regimes to quantify the impact of model selection, HPO, feature engineering, and test-time adaptation. Our main findings are: 1. After dataset-specific feature engineering, model rankings change considerably, performance differences decrease, and the importance of model selection reduces. 2. Recent models, despite their measurable progress, still significantly benefit from manual feature engineering. This holds true for both tree-based models and neural networks. 3. While tabular data is typically considered static, samples are often collected over time, and adapting to distribution shifts can be important even in supposedly static data. These insights suggest that research efforts should be directed toward a data-centric perspective, acknowledging that tabular data requires feature engineering and often exhibits temporal characteristics. Our framework is available under: https://github.com/atschalz/dc_tabeval.

8/27/2024

Data-Centric Machine Learning for Earth Observation: Necessary and Sufficient Features

Hiba Najjar, Marlon Nuske, Andreas Dengel

The availability of temporal geospatial data in multiple modalities has been extensively leveraged to enhance the performance of machine learning models. While efforts on the design of adequate model architectures are approaching a level of saturation, focusing on a data-centric perspective can complement these efforts to achieve further enhancements in data usage efficiency and model generalization capacities. This work contributes to this direction. We leverage model explanation methods to identify the features crucial for the model to reach optimal performance and the smallest set of features sufficient to achieve this performance. We evaluate our approach on three temporal multimodal geospatial datasets and compare multiple model explanation techniques. Our results reveal that some datasets can reach their optimal accuracy with less than 20% of the temporal instances, while in other datasets, the time series of a single band from a single modality is sufficient.

8/22/2024