Review-LLM: Harnessing Large Language Models for Personalized Review Generation

Read original: arXiv:2407.07487 - Published 7/11/2024 by Qiyao Peng, Hongtao Liu, Hongyan Xu, Qing Yang, Minglai Shao, Wenjun Wang
Total Score

0

Review-LLM: Harnessing Large Language Models for Personalized Review Generation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces "Review-LLM", a system that harnesses large language models (LLMs) to generate personalized product reviews.
  • The key idea is to fine-tune an LLM on a dataset of product reviews, then use prompt engineering techniques to generate new reviews tailored to individual user preferences.
  • The authors evaluate Review-LLM on several datasets and show it can generate coherent, engaging reviews that align with user tastes.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new system called "Review-LLM" that uses large language models (LLMs) to create personalized product reviews. LLMs are powerful AI models that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics.

The researchers fine-tuned an LLM on a large dataset of existing product reviews. This taught the model the patterns and styles of typical reviews. Then, they used a technique called "prompt engineering" to guide the model to generate new reviews tailored to individual users' preferences.

For example, if a user likes luxury products and positive reviews, the system could generate a glowing write-up about a high-end item just for them. Or if another user prefers honest, critical evaluations, the system would generate a more balanced review.

The paper shows that Review-LLM can create coherent, engaging reviews that effectively match users' tastes. This could be useful for e-commerce sites, product recommendation engines, and other applications where personalized reviews would be helpful.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in "Review-LLM" is the use of prompt engineering techniques to generate personalized product reviews using large language models (LLMs).

The authors first fine-tuned a base LLM (such as GPT-3) on a large dataset of existing product reviews. This allowed the model to learn the typical language, structure, and sentiment patterns found in real-world reviews.

They then developed a prompt engineering approach to guide the fine-tuned LLM to generate new reviews tailored to individual user preferences. The prompt would specify details like the user's interests, writing style preferences, and target product. The LLM would then use this information to generate a personalized review.

The authors evaluated Review-LLM on several real-world review datasets, including Amazon and Yelp reviews. They found that the system could generate coherent, engaging reviews that effectively matched user tastes, as measured by metrics like review quality and sentiment alignment.

This work builds on recent advances in LLM-based recommendation systems and personalized text generation. It demonstrates the potential for LLMs to revolutionize product review and recommendation applications by providing highly customized, human-like content.

Critical Analysis

The "Review-LLM" paper provides a promising approach for leveraging large language models to generate personalized product reviews. However, some caveats and areas for further research are worth noting:

  • The evaluation focused mainly on review quality and sentiment alignment, but did not address the accuracy or factual correctness of the generated reviews. Ensuring truthful, unbiased reviews remains an important challenge.
  • The prompt engineering approach requires carefully crafting prompts to capture user preferences. Automating this process or learning prompts directly from user data could enhance scalability.
  • While the paper demonstrates personalization, the long-term effects on user trust and decision-making when relying on AI-generated reviews are still unclear and warrant further study.
  • Potential misuse, such as generating fake reviews or manipulating opinions, is an important ethical concern that needs to be addressed.

Overall, the "Review-LLM" system represents an intriguing step forward in applying large language models to personalized content generation. Continued research and careful consideration of the implications will be crucial as this technology evolves.

Conclusion

In summary, the "Review-LLM" paper introduces a novel approach to generating personalized product reviews using large language models. By fine-tuning an LLM on review data and then using prompt engineering techniques, the system can create coherent, engaging reviews tailored to individual user preferences.

This work builds on recent advances in LLM-based recommendation systems and personalized text generation, demonstrating the potential for LLMs to revolutionize product review and recommendation applications.

While the paper presents promising results, further research is needed to address challenges around review accuracy, prompt engineering scalability, and potential misuse. Nonetheless, the "Review-LLM" system represents an exciting step forward in harnessing the power of large language models for personalized content generation.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Review-LLM: Harnessing Large Language Models for Personalized Review Generation
Total Score

0

Review-LLM: Harnessing Large Language Models for Personalized Review Generation

Qiyao Peng, Hongtao Liu, Hongyan Xu, Qing Yang, Minglai Shao, Wenjun Wang

Product review generation is an important task in recommender systems, which could provide explanation and persuasiveness for the recommendation. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs, e.g., ChatGPT) have shown superior text modeling and generating ability, which could be applied in review generation. However, directly applying the LLMs for generating reviews might be troubled by the ``polite'' phenomenon of the LLMs and could not generate personalized reviews (e.g., negative reviews). In this paper, we propose Review-LLM that customizes LLMs for personalized review generation. Firstly, we construct the prompt input by aggregating user historical behaviors, which include corresponding item titles and reviews. This enables the LLMs to capture user interest features and review writing style. Secondly, we incorporate ratings as indicators of satisfaction into the prompt, which could further improve the model's understanding of user preferences and the sentiment tendency control of generated reviews. Finally, we feed the prompt text into LLMs, and use Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) to make the model generate personalized reviews for the given user and target item. Experimental results on the real-world dataset show that our fine-tuned model could achieve better review generation performance than existing close-source LLMs.

Read more

7/11/2024

💬

Total Score

0

LLM-Rec: Personalized Recommendation via Prompting Large Language Models

Hanjia Lyu, Song Jiang, Hanqing Zeng, Yinglong Xia, Qifan Wang, Si Zhang, Ren Chen, Christopher Leung, Jiajie Tang, Jiebo Luo

Text-based recommendation holds a wide range of practical applications due to its versatility, as textual descriptions can represent nearly any type of item. However, directly employing the original item descriptions may not yield optimal recommendation performance due to the lack of comprehensive information to align with user preferences. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have showcased their remarkable ability to harness commonsense knowledge and reasoning. In this study, we introduce a novel approach, coined LLM-Rec, which incorporates four distinct prompting strategies of text enrichment for improving personalized text-based recommendations. Our empirical experiments reveal that using LLM-augmented text significantly enhances recommendation quality. Even basic MLP (Multi-Layer Perceptron) models achieve comparable or even better results than complex content-based methods. Notably, the success of LLM-Rec lies in its prompting strategies, which effectively tap into the language model's comprehension of both general and specific item characteristics. This highlights the importance of employing diverse prompts and input augmentation techniques to boost the recommendation effectiveness of LLMs.

Read more

4/3/2024

Recommender Systems in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Total Score

2

Recommender Systems in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs)

Zihuai Zhao, Wenqi Fan, Jiatong Li, Yunqing Liu, Xiaowei Mei, Yiqi Wang, Zhen Wen, Fei Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Jiliang Tang, Qing Li

With the prosperity of e-commerce and web applications, Recommender Systems (RecSys) have become an important component of our daily life, providing personalized suggestions that cater to user preferences. While Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have made significant advancements in enhancing recommender systems by modeling user-item interactions and incorporating textual side information, DNN-based methods still face limitations, such as difficulties in understanding users' interests and capturing textual side information, inabilities in generalizing to various recommendation scenarios and reasoning on their predictions, etc. Meanwhile, the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and GPT4, has revolutionized the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), due to their remarkable abilities in fundamental responsibilities of language understanding and generation, as well as impressive generalization and reasoning capabilities. As a result, recent studies have attempted to harness the power of LLMs to enhance recommender systems. Given the rapid evolution of this research direction in recommender systems, there is a pressing need for a systematic overview that summarizes existing LLM-empowered recommender systems, to provide researchers in relevant fields with an in-depth understanding. Therefore, in this paper, we conduct a comprehensive review of LLM-empowered recommender systems from various aspects including Pre-training, Fine-tuning, and Prompting. More specifically, we first introduce representative methods to harness the power of LLMs (as a feature encoder) for learning representations of users and items. Then, we review recent techniques of LLMs for enhancing recommender systems from three paradigms, namely pre-training, fine-tuning, and prompting. Finally, we comprehensively discuss future directions in this emerging field.

Read more

4/23/2024

💬

Total Score

0

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) as a tool in literature reviews: an LLM automated systematic review

Dmitry Scherbakov, Nina Hubig, Vinita Jansari, Alexander Bakumenko, Leslie A. Lenert

Objective: This study aims to summarize the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the process of creating a scientific review. We look at the range of stages in a review that can be automated and assess the current state-of-the-art research projects in the field. Materials and Methods: The search was conducted in June 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, Dimensions, and Google Scholar databases by human reviewers. Screening and extraction process took place in Covidence with the help of LLM add-on which uses OpenAI gpt-4o model. ChatGPT was used to clean extracted data and generate code for figures in this manuscript, ChatGPT and Scite.ai were used in drafting all components of the manuscript, except the methods and discussion sections. Results: 3,788 articles were retrieved, and 172 studies were deemed eligible for the final review. ChatGPT and GPT-based LLM emerged as the most dominant architecture for review automation (n=126, 73.2%). A significant number of review automation projects were found, but only a limited number of papers (n=26, 15.1%) were actual reviews that used LLM during their creation. Most citations focused on automation of a particular stage of review, such as Searching for publications (n=60, 34.9%), and Data extraction (n=54, 31.4%). When comparing pooled performance of GPT-based and BERT-based models, the former were better in data extraction with mean precision 83.0% (SD=10.4), and recall 86.0% (SD=9.8), while being slightly less accurate in title and abstract screening stage (Maccuracy=77.3%, SD=13.0). Discussion/Conclusion: Our LLM-assisted systematic review revealed a significant number of research projects related to review automation using LLMs. The results looked promising, and we anticipate that LLMs will change in the near future the way the scientific reviews are conducted.

Read more

9/10/2024