A Review of Pseudo-Labeling for Computer Vision
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a plain English summary of a research paper on pseudo-labeling techniques for computer vision models
- Covers the key ideas, significance, technical details, and critical analysis of the research
- Aims to make the complex concepts more accessible to a general audience
Plain English Explanation
Pseudo-labeling is a technique used in machine learning, particularly for computer vision tasks, to improve the performance of models when labeled data is scarce. The basic idea is to train a model on some labeled data, then use that model to generate "pseudo-labels" (i.e., predicted labels) for unlabeled data. The model can then be fine-tuned using a combination of the original labeled data and the pseudo-labeled data.
This approach can be helpful when it's difficult or expensive to obtain large amounts of labeled data, which is often the case in real-world applications. By leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data, pseudo-labeling can lead to improved model performance compared to using only the limited labeled data.
Technical Explanation
The research paper provides a comprehensive review of pseudo-labeling techniques for computer vision. It covers the key components of pseudo-labeling, such as how to select reliable pseudo-labels, how to leverage both fixed and dynamic pseudo-labels, and how pseudo-labeling can benefit different model layers. The paper also discusses the relationship between pseudo-labeling and other semi-supervised learning approaches, such as self-training.
The researchers analyze the strengths and limitations of pseudo-labeling, highlighting the importance of carefully selecting reliable pseudo-labels and the potential for pseudo-labeling to benefit some model layers more than others. They also note that the effectiveness of pseudo-labeling can be influenced by factors such as the quality and diversity of the unlabeled data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and balanced assessment of pseudo-labeling techniques, acknowledging both the potential benefits and the challenges. One key limitation is the reliance on the initial model's accuracy to generate reliable pseudo-labels. If the model is not sufficiently accurate, the pseudo-labels may be of poor quality, which could actually harm the model's performance during fine-tuning.
Additionally, the paper notes that the impact of pseudo-labeling can vary across different model layers, suggesting that more research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and develop more effective strategies for leveraging pseudo-labels throughout the model.
Conclusion
Overall, the research paper offers a comprehensive review of pseudo-labeling for computer vision, highlighting its potential to improve model performance in data-scarce scenarios, as well as the important considerations and limitations that must be addressed. The insights provided in this paper can help researchers and practitioners better understand the role of pseudo-labeling in advancing the state of the art in computer vision.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Review of Pseudo-Labeling for Computer Vision
Patrick Kage, Jay C. Rothenberger, Pavlos Andreadis, Dimitrios I. Diochnos
Deep neural models have achieved state of the art performance on a wide range of problems in computer science, especially in computer vision. However, deep neural networks often require large datasets of labeled samples to generalize effectively, and an important area of active research is semi-supervised learning, which attempts to instead utilize large quantities of (easily acquired) unlabeled samples. One family of methods in this space is pseudo-labeling, a class of algorithms that use model outputs to assign labels to unlabeled samples which are then used as labeled samples during training. Such assigned labels, called pseudo-labels, are most commonly associated with the field of semi-supervised learning. In this work we explore a broader interpretation of pseudo-labels within both self-supervised and unsupervised methods. By drawing the connection between these areas we identify new directions when advancements in one area would likely benefit others, such as curriculum learning and self-supervised regularization.
Read more8/15/2024
0
You can't handle the (dirty) truth: Data-centric insights improve pseudo-labeling
Nabeel Seedat, Nicolas Huynh, Fergus Imrie, Mihaela van der Schaar
Pseudo-labeling is a popular semi-supervised learning technique to leverage unlabeled data when labeled samples are scarce. The generation and selection of pseudo-labels heavily rely on labeled data. Existing approaches implicitly assume that the labeled data is gold standard and 'perfect'. However, this can be violated in reality with issues such as mislabeling or ambiguity. We address this overlooked aspect and show the importance of investigating labeled data quality to improve any pseudo-labeling method. Specifically, we introduce a novel data characterization and selection framework called DIPS to extend pseudo-labeling. We select useful labeled and pseudo-labeled samples via analysis of learning dynamics. We demonstrate the applicability and impact of DIPS for various pseudo-labeling methods across an extensive range of real-world tabular and image datasets. Additionally, DIPS improves data efficiency and reduces the performance distinctions between different pseudo-labelers. Overall, we highlight the significant benefits of a data-centric rethinking of pseudo-labeling in real-world settings.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Self Adaptive Threshold Pseudo-labeling and Unreliable Sample Contrastive Loss for Semi-supervised Image Classification
Xuerong Zhang, Li Huang, Jing Lv, Ming Yang
Semi-supervised learning is attracting blooming attention, due to its success in combining unlabeled data. However, pseudo-labeling-based semi-supervised approaches suffer from two problems in image classification: (1) Existing methods might fail to adopt suitable thresholds since they either use a pre-defined/fixed threshold or an ad-hoc threshold adjusting scheme, resulting in inferior performance and slow convergence. (2) Discarding unlabeled data with confidence below the thresholds results in the loss of discriminating information. To solve these issues, we develop an effective method to make sufficient use of unlabeled data. Specifically, we design a self adaptive threshold pseudo-labeling strategy, which thresholds for each class can be dynamically adjusted to increase the number of reliable samples. Meanwhile, in order to effectively utilise unlabeled data with confidence below the thresholds, we propose an unreliable sample contrastive loss to mine the discriminative information in low-confidence samples by learning the similarities and differences between sample features. We evaluate our method on several classification benchmarks under partially labeled settings and demonstrate its superiority over the other approaches.
Read more7/8/2024
🖼️
0
Leveraging Fixed and Dynamic Pseudo-labels for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation
Suruchi Kumari, Pravendra Singh
Semi-supervised medical image segmentation has gained growing interest due to its ability to utilize unannotated data. The current state-of-the-art methods mostly rely on pseudo-labeling within a co-training framework. These methods depend on a single pseudo-label for training, but these labels are not as accurate as the ground truth of labeled data. Relying solely on one pseudo-label often results in suboptimal results. To this end, we propose a novel approach where multiple pseudo-labels for the same unannotated image are used to learn from the unlabeled data: the conventional fixed pseudo-label and the newly introduced dynamic pseudo-label. By incorporating multiple pseudo-labels for the same unannotated image into the co-training framework, our approach provides a more robust training approach that improves model performance and generalization capabilities. We validate our novel approach on three semi-supervised medical benchmark segmentation datasets, the Left Atrium dataset, the Pancreas-CT dataset, and the Brats-2019 dataset. Our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods over multiple medical benchmark segmentation datasets with different labeled data ratios. We also present several ablation experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of various components used in our approach.
Read more5/14/2024