Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learning
0
🚀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Revisits the problem of Agnostic Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning
- Focuses on understanding the differences between the realizable and agnostic settings
- Explores how these differences affect the complexity of learning algorithms
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the concept of Agnostic PAC Learning. In the realizable setting, the learning algorithm is assumed to have access to a hypothesis class that contains the true function. However, in the agnostic setting, the true function may not be representable by any hypothesis in the class.
The researchers investigate how this difference impacts the complexity of learning algorithms. They aim to understand the fundamental differences between these two settings and how they affect the ability to efficiently learn from data.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the realizable and agnostic settings in PAC learning. It explores the relationships between the sample complexity, hypothesis class complexity, and approximation error in each setting.
The researchers derive upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity required for learning in the realizable and agnostic cases. These bounds highlight the increased difficulty of learning in the agnostic setting, where the algorithm must contend with the possibility that the true function is not representable by the hypothesis class.
The analysis also sheds light on the role of approximation error in determining the feasibility of efficient learning. When the hypothesis class can closely approximate the true function, the realizable setting allows for more efficient learning. But in the agnostic case, the approximation error plays a more significant role in the complexity of the learning problem.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous theoretical analysis of the differences between the realizable and agnostic settings in PAC learning. However, the research is primarily focused on the theoretical aspects and does not include any empirical evaluation or real-world case studies.
While the theoretical insights are valuable, it would be helpful to see how these findings translate to practical machine learning problems. Exploring the implications of the realizable and agnostic settings in the context of specific applications could further validate the significance of this work and provide guidance for practitioners.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential strategies or techniques for mitigating the increased complexity of the agnostic setting. Exploring approaches that can narrow the gap between the realizable and agnostic cases could be a fruitful avenue for future research.
Conclusion
This paper offers a deep dive into the fundamental differences between the realizable and agnostic settings in PAC learning. By rigorously analyzing the sample complexity and approximation error in each case, the researchers shed light on the inherent challenges of learning in the absence of perfect representability.
The insights provided in this work can inform the design of more robust and efficient learning algorithms, particularly in scenarios where the true function may not be exactly representable by the available hypothesis class. This understanding can have broader implications for the development of machine learning systems that can reliably operate in the face of uncertain or noisy data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🚀
0
Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learning
Steve Hanneke, Kasper Green Larsen, Nikita Zhivotovskiy
PAC learning, dating back to Valiant'84 and Vapnik and Chervonenkis'64,'74, is a classic model for studying supervised learning. In the agnostic setting, we have access to a hypothesis set $mathcal{H}$ and a training set of labeled samples $(x_1,y_1),dots,(x_n,y_n) in mathcal{X} times {-1,1}$ drawn i.i.d. from an unknown distribution $mathcal{D}$. The goal is to produce a classifier $h : mathcal{X} to {-1,1}$ that is competitive with the hypothesis $h^star_{mathcal{D}} in mathcal{H}$ having the least probability of mispredicting the label $y$ of a new sample $(x,y)sim mathcal{D}$. Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a natural learning algorithm, where one simply outputs the hypothesis from $mathcal{H}$ making the fewest mistakes on the training data. This simple algorithm is known to have an optimal error in terms of the VC-dimension of $mathcal{H}$ and the number of samples $n$. In this work, we revisit agnostic PAC learning and first show that ERM is in fact sub-optimal if we treat the performance of the best hypothesis, denoted $tau:=Pr_{mathcal{D}}[h^star_{mathcal{D}}(x) neq y]$, as a parameter. Concretely we show that ERM, and any other proper learning algorithm, is sub-optimal by a $sqrt{ln(1/tau)}$ factor. We then complement this lower bound with the first learning algorithm achieving an optimal error for nearly the full range of $tau$. Our algorithm introduces several new ideas that we hope may find further applications in learning theory.
Read more7/30/2024
✅
0
Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling Functions
Yuyang Deng, Mingda Qiao
We study a variant of Collaborative PAC Learning, in which we aim to learn an accurate classifier for each of the $n$ data distributions, while minimizing the number of samples drawn from them in total. Unlike in the usual collaborative learning setup, it is not assumed that there exists a single classifier that is simultaneously accurate for all distributions. We show that, when the data distributions satisfy a weaker realizability assumption, which appeared in [Crammer and Mansour, 2012] in the context of multi-task learning, sample-efficient learning is still feasible. We give a learning algorithm based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) on a natural augmentation of the hypothesis class, and the analysis relies on an upper bound on the VC dimension of this augmented class. In terms of the computational efficiency, we show that ERM on the augmented hypothesis class is NP-hard, which gives evidence against the existence of computationally efficient learners in general. On the positive side, for two special cases, we give learners that are both sample- and computationally-efficient.
Read more5/24/2024
↗️
0
Is Efficient PAC Learning Possible with an Oracle That Responds 'Yes' or 'No'?
Constantinos Daskalakis, Noah Golowich
The empirical risk minimization (ERM) principle has been highly impactful in machine learning, leading both to near-optimal theoretical guarantees for ERM-based learning algorithms as well as driving many of the recent empirical successes in deep learning. In this paper, we investigate the question of whether the ability to perform ERM, which computes a hypothesis minimizing empirical risk on a given dataset, is necessary for efficient learning: in particular, is there a weaker oracle than ERM which can nevertheless enable learnability? We answer this question affirmatively, showing that in the realizable setting of PAC learning for binary classification, a concept class can be learned using an oracle which only returns a single bit indicating whether a given dataset is realizable by some concept in the class. The sample complexity and oracle complexity of our algorithm depend polynomially on the VC dimension of the hypothesis class, thus showing that there is only a polynomial price to pay for use of our weaker oracle. Our results extend to the agnostic learning setting with a slight strengthening of the oracle, as well as to the partial concept, multiclass and real-valued learning settings. In the setting of partial concept classes, prior to our work no oracle-efficient algorithms were known, even with a standard ERM oracle. Thus, our results address a question of Alon et al. (2021) who asked whether there are algorithmic principles which enable efficient learnability in this setting.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Error Exponent in Agnostic PAC Learning
Adi Hendel, Meir Feder
Statistical learning theory and the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) criterion are the common approach to mathematical learning theory. PAC is widely used to analyze learning problems and algorithms, and have been studied thoroughly. Uniform worst case bounds on the convergence rate have been well established using, e.g., VC theory or Radamacher complexity. However, in a typical scenario the performance could be much better. In this paper, we consider PAC learning using a somewhat different tradeoff, the error exponent - a well established analysis method in Information Theory - which describes the exponential behavior of the probability that the risk will exceed a certain threshold as function of the sample size. We focus on binary classification and find, under some stability assumptions, an improved distribution dependent error exponent for a wide range of problems, establishing the exponential behavior of the PAC error probability in agnostic learning. Interestingly, under these assumptions, agnostic learning may have the same error exponent as realizable learning. The error exponent criterion can be applied to analyze knowledge distillation, a problem that so far lacks a theoretical analysis.
Read more5/3/2024