Is Efficient PAC Learning Possible with an Oracle That Responds 'Yes' or 'No'?

Read original: arXiv:2406.11667 - Published 6/19/2024 by Constantinos Daskalakis, Noah Golowich
Total Score

0

↗️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper examines the feasibility of efficient Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning with an oracle that can only respond "yes" or "no" to queries.
  • It investigates whether this restricted oracle model is sufficient for efficient PAC learning or if more powerful oracles are required.
  • The research provides insights into the computational complexity of learning under different oracle models and the inherent limitations of PAC learning.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a specific type of machine learning called Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning, which is a way of building models that can make accurate predictions most of the time. PAC learning typically relies on an "oracle" - a source of information that the learning algorithm can query to get the right answers.

In this research, the scientists look at what happens when the oracle can only respond with a simple "yes" or "no" to the queries, rather than providing more detailed information. They want to understand if this restricted oracle model is still sufficient for efficient PAC learning, or if more powerful oracles are needed.

The key insight is that the computational complexity of the learning task depends on the capabilities of the oracle. With a yes/no oracle, there are certain problems that can still be learned efficiently, while others become much harder or even impossible to learn in a reasonable amount of time. This tells us something fundamental about the inherent limitations of PAC learning and the types of information that are required for efficient model building.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the computational complexity of PAC learning in a restricted oracle model where the oracle can only respond "yes" or "no" to queries, rather than providing more detailed information. The authors analyze the relationships between the complexity of the learning problem, the expressiveness of the concept class, and the power of the oracle.

They show that efficient PAC learning is possible in this yes/no oracle model for certain concept classes, such as linear threshold functions. However, for other more complex concept classes, they prove that efficient PAC learning is not possible with a yes/no oracle and requires oracles with greater query-answering capabilities.

The results demonstrate fundamental tradeoffs between the computational complexity of learning and the informational requirements of the oracle. They provide insights into the inherent limitations of PAC learning and the role that oracle models play in determining the feasibility of efficient model building.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes important theoretical contributions to our understanding of the computational complexity of PAC learning. However, it is limited to the idealized setting of a yes/no oracle, which may not fully capture the nuances of real-world learning scenarios.

In practice, learning algorithms often have access to more expressive oracles or training data that provide richer feedback beyond simple binary responses. The insights from this research may be more directly applicable to specialized learning settings, such as semi-supervised learning or learning from label proportions, where the available information is more constrained.

Furthermore, the paper focuses on the computational complexity aspects of PAC learning, but does not address other important considerations such as adversarial robustness or the practical implications of the theoretical results. Exploring these additional perspectives could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the limitations and potential of PAC learning in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This research paper offers valuable insights into the computational complexity of PAC learning with a restricted yes/no oracle model. It demonstrates that the power of the available information, as captured by the oracle, plays a crucial role in determining the feasibility of efficient model building.

The findings highlight the inherent tradeoffs between the complexity of the learning problem and the informational requirements of the oracle. These insights can inform the design of more effective learning algorithms and the selection of appropriate data sources for specific learning tasks.

While the paper focuses on the theoretical aspects, its implications could be further explored in the context of practical machine learning applications, particularly in specialized settings with limited or constrained feedback. Continued research in this direction can deepen our understanding of the fundamental limitations and capabilities of PAC learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Total Score

0

Is Efficient PAC Learning Possible with an Oracle That Responds 'Yes' or 'No'?

Constantinos Daskalakis, Noah Golowich

The empirical risk minimization (ERM) principle has been highly impactful in machine learning, leading both to near-optimal theoretical guarantees for ERM-based learning algorithms as well as driving many of the recent empirical successes in deep learning. In this paper, we investigate the question of whether the ability to perform ERM, which computes a hypothesis minimizing empirical risk on a given dataset, is necessary for efficient learning: in particular, is there a weaker oracle than ERM which can nevertheless enable learnability? We answer this question affirmatively, showing that in the realizable setting of PAC learning for binary classification, a concept class can be learned using an oracle which only returns a single bit indicating whether a given dataset is realizable by some concept in the class. The sample complexity and oracle complexity of our algorithm depend polynomially on the VC dimension of the hypothesis class, thus showing that there is only a polynomial price to pay for use of our weaker oracle. Our results extend to the agnostic learning setting with a slight strengthening of the oracle, as well as to the partial concept, multiclass and real-valued learning settings. In the setting of partial concept classes, prior to our work no oracle-efficient algorithms were known, even with a standard ERM oracle. Thus, our results address a question of Alon et al. (2021) who asked whether there are algorithmic principles which enable efficient learnability in this setting.

Read more

6/19/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Revisiting Agnostic PAC Learning

Steve Hanneke, Kasper Green Larsen, Nikita Zhivotovskiy

PAC learning, dating back to Valiant'84 and Vapnik and Chervonenkis'64,'74, is a classic model for studying supervised learning. In the agnostic setting, we have access to a hypothesis set $mathcal{H}$ and a training set of labeled samples $(x_1,y_1),dots,(x_n,y_n) in mathcal{X} times {-1,1}$ drawn i.i.d. from an unknown distribution $mathcal{D}$. The goal is to produce a classifier $h : mathcal{X} to {-1,1}$ that is competitive with the hypothesis $h^star_{mathcal{D}} in mathcal{H}$ having the least probability of mispredicting the label $y$ of a new sample $(x,y)sim mathcal{D}$. Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a natural learning algorithm, where one simply outputs the hypothesis from $mathcal{H}$ making the fewest mistakes on the training data. This simple algorithm is known to have an optimal error in terms of the VC-dimension of $mathcal{H}$ and the number of samples $n$. In this work, we revisit agnostic PAC learning and first show that ERM is in fact sub-optimal if we treat the performance of the best hypothesis, denoted $tau:=Pr_{mathcal{D}}[h^star_{mathcal{D}}(x) neq y]$, as a parameter. Concretely we show that ERM, and any other proper learning algorithm, is sub-optimal by a $sqrt{ln(1/tau)}$ factor. We then complement this lower bound with the first learning algorithm achieving an optimal error for nearly the full range of $tau$. Our algorithm introduces several new ideas that we hope may find further applications in learning theory.

Read more

7/30/2024

Total Score

0

Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling Functions

Yuyang Deng, Mingda Qiao

We study a variant of Collaborative PAC Learning, in which we aim to learn an accurate classifier for each of the $n$ data distributions, while minimizing the number of samples drawn from them in total. Unlike in the usual collaborative learning setup, it is not assumed that there exists a single classifier that is simultaneously accurate for all distributions. We show that, when the data distributions satisfy a weaker realizability assumption, which appeared in [Crammer and Mansour, 2012] in the context of multi-task learning, sample-efficient learning is still feasible. We give a learning algorithm based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) on a natural augmentation of the hypothesis class, and the analysis relies on an upper bound on the VC dimension of this augmented class. In terms of the computational efficiency, we show that ERM on the augmented hypothesis class is NP-hard, which gives evidence against the existence of computationally efficient learners in general. On the positive side, for two special cases, we give learners that are both sample- and computationally-efficient.

Read more

5/24/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass Classification

Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran

We study multiclass PAC learning with bandit feedback, where inputs are classified into one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is limited to whether or not the predicted labels are correct. Our main contribution is in designing a novel learning algorithm for the agnostic $(varepsilon,delta)$-PAC version of the problem, with sample complexity of $Obig( (operatorname{poly}(K) + 1 / varepsilon^2) log (|H| / delta) big)$ for any finite hypothesis class $H$. In terms of the leading dependence on $varepsilon$, this improves upon existing bounds for the problem, that are of the form $O(K/varepsilon^2)$. We also provide an extension of this result to general classes and establish similar sample complexity bounds in which $log |H|$ is replaced by the Natarajan dimension. This matches the optimal rate in the full-information version of the problem and resolves an open question studied by Daniely, Sabato, Ben-David, and Shalev-Shwartz (2011) who demonstrated that the multiplicative price of bandit feedback in realizable PAC learning is $Theta(K)$. We complement this by revealing a stark contrast with the agnostic case, where the price of bandit feedback is only $O(1)$ as $varepsilon to 0$. Our algorithm utilizes a stochastic optimization technique to minimize a log-barrier potential based on Frank-Wolfe updates for computing a low-variance exploration distribution over the hypotheses, and is made computationally efficient provided access to an ERM oracle over $H$.

Read more

6/19/2024