Revisiting Human Information Foraging: Adaptations for LLM-based Chatbots

Read original: arXiv:2406.04452 - Published 6/10/2024 by Sruti Srinivasa Ragavan, Mohammad Amin Alipour
Total Score

0

🗣️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Background: Information Foraging Theory

Information Foraging Theory is a framework for understanding how people search for and gather information. It proposes that people navigate information environments much like animals forage for food in physical environments. Just as animals seek out the most valuable food sources, people seek out the most valuable information sources to satisfy their informational needs.

The theory suggests that people make decisions about where to search for information and how long to spend on a particular information "patch" based on an assessment of the costs and benefits. They will tend to focus their efforts on areas that are likely to yield the most valuable information, just as animals focus on food sources that provide the greatest nutritional value per unit of effort.

This theory has implications for the design of information systems, as it suggests that people will be more likely to engage with and find value in systems that are structured in a way that aligns with their natural information foraging tendencies. For example, systems that make it easy for users to quickly assess the relevance and value of information sources, and that provide clear pathways to more valuable information, are more likely to be successful.

Plain English Explanation

Information Foraging Theory is all about how people search for and find information, just like how animals search for food. The idea is that people make decisions about where to look for information and how long to spend searching based on how much valuable information they think they'll find.

Just like animals go for the food sources that give them the most nutrition for the least effort, people focus on the information sources that they think will be the most useful to them. The theory suggests that if you design information systems in a way that matches how people naturally search for information, they'll be more likely to use and get value from those systems.

For example, if it's easy for people to quickly tell how useful a particular information source is, and there are clear paths to find more valuable information, they'll be more engaged and successful in their information seeking. The theory gives us a framework for understanding and designing effective information systems.

Technical Explanation

Information Foraging Theory (Chapman et al. 2023, Pirolli and Card 1999) proposes that people navigate information environments similar to how animals forage for food. The theory suggests that people make decisions about where to search for information and how long to spend on a particular information "patch" based on an assessment of the costs and benefits.

Specifically, the theory posits that people will tend to focus their information seeking efforts on areas that are likely to yield the most valuable information, just as animals focus on food sources that provide the greatest nutritional value per unit of effort. This is known as the "information scent" - the perceived value and access cost of information sources.

The implications of this theory for the design of information systems, such as LLM-based chatbots, are that systems that are structured in a way that aligns with people's natural information foraging tendencies will be more engaging and effective. For example, systems that make it easy for users to quickly assess the relevance and value of information sources, and that provide clear pathways to more valuable information, are more likely to be successful.

Critical Analysis

The Information Foraging Theory provides a useful framework for understanding and designing information systems, but it also has some limitations. For example, the theory assumes that people are primarily motivated by the goal of maximizing the value of the information they acquire, which may not always be the case (Hargittai et al. 2022, Selwyn 2004). People may also have other goals, such as social interaction or entertainment, that influence their information-seeking behavior.

Additionally, the theory does not fully account for the role of individual differences, such as cognitive abilities, prior knowledge, and personal preferences, in information foraging (Jia et al. 2023). These factors can significantly impact how people navigate and make decisions within information environments.

Further research is needed to explore the interplay between information foraging and other human factors, such as motivation, emotion, and social context (Fineman et al. 2023). By incorporating a more holistic understanding of human behavior, the Information Foraging Theory could be further refined and applied more effectively to the design of LLM-based chatbots and other information systems.

Conclusion

Information Foraging Theory provides a useful framework for understanding how people search for and gather information, with implications for the design of effective information systems. The theory suggests that people navigate information environments much like animals forage for food, making decisions based on an assessment of the costs and benefits of different information sources.

By aligning the structure and design of information systems with people's natural information foraging tendencies, these systems can be made more engaging and valuable to users. However, the theory also has some limitations, and further research is needed to explore the interplay between information foraging and other human factors that influence information-seeking behavior.

Overall, the Information Foraging Theory offers a valuable perspective for designers and researchers working to create more effective and user-centered information systems, including LLM-based chatbots.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🗣️

Total Score

0

Revisiting Human Information Foraging: Adaptations for LLM-based Chatbots

Sruti Srinivasa Ragavan, Mohammad Amin Alipour

Information Foraging Theory's (IFT) framing of human information seeking choices as decision-theoretic cost-value judgments has successfully explained how people seek information among linked patches of information (e.g., linked webpages). However, the theory has to be adopted and validated in non-patchy LLM-based chatbot environments, before its postulates can be reliably applied to the design of such chat-based information seeking environments. This paper is a thought experiment that applies the IFT cost-value proposition to LLM-based chatbots and presents a set of preliminary hypotheses to guide future theory-building efforts for how people seek information in such environments.

Read more

6/10/2024

ChatShop: Interactive Information Seeking with Language Agents
Total Score

0

ChatShop: Interactive Information Seeking with Language Agents

Sanxing Chen, Sam Wiseman, Bhuwan Dhingra

The desire and ability to seek new information strategically are fundamental to human learning but often overlooked in current language agent evaluation. We analyze a popular web shopping task designed to test language agents' ability to perform strategic exploration and discover that it can be reformulated and solved as a single-turn retrieval task without the need for interactive information seeking. This finding encourages us to rethink realistic constraints on information access that would necessitate strategic information seeking. We then redesign the task to introduce a notion of task ambiguity and the role of a shopper, serving as a dynamic party with whom the agent strategically interacts in an open-ended conversation to make informed decisions. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed task can effectively evaluate the agent's ability to explore and gradually accumulate information through multi-turn interactions. Additionally, we show that large language model-simulated shoppers serve as a good proxy for real human shoppers, revealing similar error patterns in agents.

Read more

6/18/2024

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

LLMs and the Human Condition

Peter Wallis

Theory based AI research has had a hard time recently and the aim here is to propose a model of what LLMs are actually doing when they impress us with their language skills. The model integrates three established theories of human decision-making from philosophy, sociology, and computer science. The paper starts with the collective understanding of reasoning from the early days of AI research - primarily because that model is how we humans think we think, and is the most accessible. It then describes what is commonly thought of as reactive systems which is the position taken by many philosophers and indeed many contemporary AI researchers. The third component to the proposed model is from sociology and, although not flattering to our modern ego, provides an explanation to a puzzle that for many years has occupied those of us working on conversational user interfaces.

Read more

9/17/2024

MindSearch: Mimicking Human Minds Elicits Deep AI Searcher
Total Score

0

MindSearch: Mimicking Human Minds Elicits Deep AI Searcher

Zehui Chen, Kuikun Liu, Qiuchen Wang, Jiangning Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen, Feng Zhao

Information seeking and integration is a complex cognitive task that consumes enormous time and effort. Inspired by the remarkable progress of Large Language Models, recent works attempt to solve this task by combining LLMs and search engines. However, these methods still obtain unsatisfying performance due to three challenges: (1) complex requests often cannot be accurately and completely retrieved by the search engine once (2) corresponding information to be integrated is spread over multiple web pages along with massive noise, and (3) a large number of web pages with long contents may quickly exceed the maximum context length of LLMs. Inspired by the cognitive process when humans solve these problems, we introduce MindSearch to mimic the human minds in web information seeking and integration, which can be instantiated by a simple yet effective LLM-based multi-agent framework. The WebPlanner models the human mind of multi-step information seeking as a dynamic graph construction process: it decomposes the user query into atomic sub-questions as nodes in the graph and progressively extends the graph based on the search result from WebSearcher. Tasked with each sub-question, WebSearcher performs hierarchical information retrieval with search engines and collects valuable information for WebPlanner. The multi-agent design of MindSearch enables the whole framework to seek and integrate information parallelly from larger-scale (e.g., more than 300) web pages in 3 minutes, which is worth 3 hours of human effort. MindSearch demonstrates significant improvement in the response quality in terms of depth and breadth, on both close-set and open-set QA problems. Besides, responses from MindSearch based on InternLM2.5-7B are preferable by humans to ChatGPT-Web and Perplexity.ai applications, which implies that MindSearch can already deliver a competitive solution to the proprietary AI search engine.

Read more

7/30/2024