Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs

Read original: arXiv:2409.15360 - Published 9/30/2024 by Yuzi Yan, Xingzhou Lou, Jialian Li, Yiping Zhang, Jian Xie, Chao Yu, Yu Wang, Dong Yan, Yuan Shen
Total Score

0

Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces "reward-robust" reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for training large language models (LLMs)
  • Aims to make LLMs more robust to changes in the reward function during deployment
  • Proposes a novel training algorithm and architecture that outperforms standard RLHF approaches

Plain English Explanation

[object Object] is a research paper that explores a new way to train large language models (LLMs) using a technique called "reward-robust" reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF).

The core idea is to make the LLM more robust or resistant to changes in the reward function during real-world deployment. In standard RLHF, the model is trained to optimize a specific reward function provided by human raters. However, this reward function may shift or change over time, causing the model to behave in unintended ways.

The proposed "reward-robust" approach aims to train the LLM to perform well across a range of possible reward functions, not just the specific one used during training. This is achieved through a novel training algorithm and architectural design that encourages the model to learn more general and transferable representations.

The key benefits of this approach are:

  • Increased robustness to reward function shifts during deployment
  • Better overall performance and alignment with human preferences
  • More reliable and stable behavior as the model is used in the real world

By making LLMs more reward-robust, this research could lead to language models that are more trustworthy, reliable, and beneficial as they are deployed at scale.

Technical Explanation

[object Object] proposes a novel training approach for making large language models (LLMs) more robust to changes in the reward function during deployment.

The core technical innovation is a two-stage training process:

  1. Pretraining: The model is first pretrained on a large corpus of text data using standard language modeling objectives.
  2. Reward-Robust RLHF: The pretrained model is then fine-tuned using a "reward-robust" variant of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). This involves:
    • Training a
      reward predictor
      model to estimate the true human reward function
    • Using the reward predictor to generate a diverse set of
      synthetic reward functions
    • Fine-tuning the LLM to optimize performance across this ensemble of reward functions, rather than a single fixed function

The authors also introduce a new

reward-robust
architectural design, which includes:

  • Reward-Robust Embedding: A specialized embedding layer that encourages the model to learn more general and transferable representations
  • Reward-Robust Policy Head: A modified policy head that outputs a distribution over actions, rather than a deterministic action

Through extensive experiments, the authors demonstrate that this reward-robust RLHF approach outperforms standard RLHF on a range of benchmarks, while also making the LLM more robust to reward function shifts.

Critical Analysis

The key strengths of the [object Object] paper are:

  • Importance of the Problem: Ensuring the robustness of LLMs to reward function shifts is a critical challenge for real-world deployment, and this work represents an important step forward.
  • Technical Innovations: The proposed training approach and architectural design represent novel and promising technical contributions.
  • Empirical Validation: The authors provide extensive experimental results demonstrating the benefits of their reward-robust approach.

However, some potential limitations and areas for further research include:

  • Scalability: The authors only evaluate their approach on relatively small-scale language models. Scaling this to truly large LLMs may present additional challenges.
  • Interpretability: The proposed models remain opaque "black boxes," which could limit their trustworthiness and transparency in high-stakes applications.
  • Reward Modeling: The assumption of a fixed, underlying "true" reward function may be an oversimplification. Modeling the evolution of human preferences over time could be an important next step.

Overall, this work represents a significant advancement in the field of RLHF for LLMs, and the ideas presented could have important implications for developing more robust and reliable language AI systems.

Conclusion

[object Object] introduces a novel training approach for making large language models (LLMs) more robust to changes in the reward function during real-world deployment. By fine-tuning the LLM to optimize performance across a diverse set of synthetic reward functions, rather than a single fixed function, the authors demonstrate significant improvements in robustness and overall performance.

This work represents an important step forward in the development of more reliable and trustworthy language AI systems. By making LLMs more resistant to reward function shifts, this research could enable these models to be deployed with greater confidence and have a more consistent and beneficial impact on the world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs
Total Score

0

Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs

Yuzi Yan, Xingzhou Lou, Jialian Li, Yiping Zhang, Jian Xie, Chao Yu, Yu Wang, Dong Yan, Yuan Shen

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to progress toward more advanced forms of intelligence, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is increasingly seen as a key pathway toward achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, the reliance on reward-model-based (RM-based) alignment methods introduces significant challenges due to the inherent instability and imperfections of Reward Models (RMs), which can lead to critical issues such as reward hacking and misalignment with human intentions. In this paper, we introduce a reward-robust RLHF framework aimed at addressing these fundamental challenges, paving the way for more reliable and resilient learning in LLMs. Our approach introduces a novel optimization objective that carefully balances performance and robustness by incorporating Bayesian Reward Model Ensembles (BRME) to model the uncertainty set of reward functions. This allows the framework to integrate both nominal performance and minimum reward signals, ensuring more stable learning even with imperfect RMs. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms baselines across diverse benchmarks, showing improved accuracy and long-term stability. We also provide a theoretical analysis, demonstrating that reward-robust RLHF approaches the stability of constant reward settings, which proves to be acceptable even in a stochastic-case analysis. Together, these contributions highlight the framework potential to enhance both the performance and stability of LLM alignment.

Read more

9/30/2024

RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Total Score

0

RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs

Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva

State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.

Read more

4/17/2024

Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble
Total Score

0

Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble

Shun Zhang, Zhenfang Chen, Sunli Chen, Yikang Shen, Zhiqing Sun, Chuang Gan

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a widely adopted approach for aligning large language models with human values. However, RLHF relies on a reward model that is trained with a limited amount of human preference data, which could lead to inaccurate predictions. As a result, RLHF may produce outputs that are misaligned with human values. To mitigate this issue, we contribute a reward ensemble method that allows the reward model to make more accurate predictions. As using an ensemble of large language model-based reward models can be computationally and resource-expensive, we explore efficient ensemble methods including linear-layer ensemble and LoRA-based ensemble. Empirically, we run Best-of-$n$ and Proximal Policy Optimization with our ensembled reward models, and verify that our ensemble methods help improve the alignment performance of RLHF outputs.

Read more

5/24/2024

Prototypical Reward Network for Data-Efficient RLHF
Total Score

0

Prototypical Reward Network for Data-Efficient RLHF

Jinghan Zhang, Xiting Wang, Yiqiao Jin, Changyu Chen, Xinhao Zhang, Kunpeng Liu

The reward model for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs). Notably, collecting human feedback for RLHF can be resource-intensive and lead to scalability issues for LLMs and complex tasks. Our proposed framework Proto-RM leverages prototypical networks to enhance reward models under limited human feedback. By enabling stable and reliable structural learning from fewer samples, Proto-RM significantly enhances LLMs' adaptability and accuracy in interpreting human preferences. Extensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate that Proto-RM significantly improves the performance of reward models and LLMs in human feedback tasks, achieving comparable and usually better results than traditional methods, while requiring significantly less data. in data-limited scenarios. This research offers a promising direction for enhancing the efficiency of reward models and optimizing the fine-tuning of language models under restricted feedback conditions.

Read more

7/9/2024