A Riemannian Approach to Ground Metric Learning for Optimal Transport

Overview

• This paper presents a Riemannian approach to learning a ground metric for discrete optimal transport.
• The key idea is to represent the ground metric as a Mahalanobis distance, which is parameterized by a Riemannian metric tensor.
• The authors formulate an optimization problem to learn this Riemannian metric tensor, which can be solved efficiently using a gradient-based algorithm.
• Experiments show that the learned ground metric outperforms standard Euclidean and other commonly used metrics in optimal transport tasks.

Plain English Explanation

In the field of machine learning, optimal transport is a powerful technique for comparing and aligning different types of data. However, a crucial component of optimal transport is the ground metric, which defines how distances are measured between individual data points.

The authors of this paper propose a new way to learn the ground metric using a Riemannian geometry approach. Rather than using a simple Euclidean distance, they represent the ground metric as a more flexible Mahalanobis distance. This Mahalanobis distance is parameterized by a Riemannian metric tensor, which the authors learn through optimization.

By learning this Riemannian metric tensor, the ground metric can be adapted to better capture the underlying structure of the data. The authors show that this learned ground metric outperforms standard Euclidean and other commonly used metrics in a variety of optimal transport tasks.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is a Riemannian approach to learning the ground metric for discrete optimal transport problems. Specifically, the authors represent the ground metric as a Mahalanobis distance, which is parameterized by a Riemannian metric tensor M:

d(x, y) = sqrt((x - y)^T M (x - y))

The authors formulate an optimization problem to learn the Riemannian metric tensor M by minimizing a loss function that encodes the optimal transport objective. This optimization problem can be efficiently solved using a gradient-based algorithm.

Importantly, the Riemannian geometry framework allows the authors to leverage useful properties, such as the geometric mean of positive definite matrices, to ensure that the learned M remains positive definite throughout the optimization process.

The authors evaluate their approach on several optimal transport tasks, including semi-supervised learning and domain adaptation. The results demonstrate that the learned ground metric consistently outperforms standard Euclidean and other commonly used metrics.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis of their Riemannian approach to ground metric learning for optimal transport. One potential limitation, however, is the computational complexity of the optimization problem, which may limit the scalability of the method to very large-scale problems.

Additionally, the authors do not explore the interpretability of the learned Riemannian metric tensor M. It would be interesting to understand how the learned metric captures the underlying structure of the data and how this relates to the performance improvements observed in the experiments.

Further research could also investigate the robustness of the Riemannian approach to various data distributions and noise levels, as well as its applicability to other optimal transport-related tasks, such as partial transport or optimal map estimation.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel Riemannian approach to learning the ground metric for discrete optimal transport problems. By representing the ground metric as a Mahalanobis distance parameterized by a Riemannian metric tensor, the authors are able to learn a more flexible and adaptive ground metric that outperforms standard Euclidean and other commonly used metrics in a variety of optimal transport tasks. The Riemannian geometry framework provides a principled way to optimize the metric tensor, and the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through comprehensive experiments. While the method may have some computational limitations, this work represents an important contribution to the field of optimal transport and opens up new avenues for further research.