RLAIF-V: Aligning MLLMs through Open-Source AI Feedback for Super GPT-4V Trustworthiness
2405.17220
0
0
Abstract
Learning from feedback reduces the hallucination of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) by aligning them with human preferences. While traditional methods rely on labor-intensive and time-consuming manual labeling, recent approaches employing models as automatic labelers have shown promising results without human intervention. However, these methods heavily rely on costly proprietary models like GPT-4V, resulting in scalability issues. Moreover, this paradigm essentially distills the proprietary models to provide a temporary solution to quickly bridge the performance gap. As this gap continues to shrink, the community is soon facing the essential challenge of aligning MLLMs using labeler models of comparable capability. In this work, we introduce RLAIF-V, a novel framework that aligns MLLMs in a fully open-source paradigm for super GPT-4V trustworthiness. RLAIF-V maximally exploits the open-source feedback from two perspectives, including high-quality feedback data and online feedback learning algorithm. Extensive experiments on seven benchmarks in both automatic and human evaluation show that RLAIF-V substantially enhances the trustworthiness of models without sacrificing performance on other tasks. Using a 34B model as labeler, RLAIF-V 7B model reduces object hallucination by 82.9% and overall hallucination by 42.1%, outperforming the labeler model. Remarkably, RLAIF-V also reveals the self-alignment potential of open-source MLLMs, where a 12B model can learn from the feedback of itself to achieve less than 29.5% overall hallucination rate, surpassing GPT-4V (45.9%) by a large margin. The results shed light on a promising route to enhance the efficacy of leading-edge MLLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach called RLAIF-V (Reinforcement Learning Alignment through Iterative Feedback for Very Large Language Models) to align extremely large language models (MLLMs) like GPT-4V with human preferences and values.
- The key idea is to use open-source AI feedback, collected through a web interface, to iteratively fine-tune and improve the alignment of these powerful language models.
- The authors claim this approach can help make MLLMs like GPT-4V more trustworthy and beneficial to society.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new method called RLAIF-V to help align extremely large and capable language models, like the hypothetical GPT-4V, with human values and preferences. The core idea is to use an open-source feedback system where people can interact with and provide input on the model's outputs. This feedback is then used to iteratively fine-tune and improve the model's alignment, making it more trustworthy and beneficial.
The researchers argue that as language models become more powerful, it's critical to ensure they are well-aligned with human values to avoid potential misuse or unintended negative consequences. By involving the public in the model refinement process through open-source feedback, the hope is to create MLLMs that are more reliable, safe, and beneficial to society.
Technical Explanation
The RLAIF-V approach builds on prior work in FGAIF: Aligning Large Vision-Language Models, FLAME: Factuality-Aware Alignment of Large Language Models, and More RLHF, More Trust: The Impact of Human Preference, which have explored different methods for aligning large language models with human values.
The key components of RLAIF-V include:
- A web-based interface that allows the public to provide feedback on the model's outputs, including ratings, comments, and corrections.
- A reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning process that incorporates this feedback to iteratively update the model and improve its alignment.
- Extensive testing and evaluation to ensure the refined model meets high standards of safety, reliability, and trustworthiness.
The authors claim that this open-source, iterative approach can be more effective than traditional supervised fine-tuning methods, as it taps into a broader range of human perspectives and values. Additionally, by making the feedback process public, the researchers aim to increase transparency and build trust in the alignment of these extremely powerful language models.
Critical Analysis
The RLAIF-V approach presented in the paper is a promising step towards aligning large language models with human values and preferences. The use of open-source feedback and iterative fine-tuning is an interesting innovation that could help address some of the challenges identified in ALI: Agent-based Assessment of LLMs' Alignment with Human Values and AlignGPT: Multi-Modal Large Language Models for Adaptive Alignment.
However, the paper does not fully address potential issues such as the representativeness of the feedback, the potential for manipulation or abuse of the open-source system, and the scalability of the approach as language models become even larger and more complex. Additionally, the authors do not discuss the potential biases or limitations that may be introduced through the iterative fine-tuning process.
Further research and rigorous testing would be needed to fully evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the RLAIF-V approach, especially as it is applied to extremely powerful language models like the hypothetical GPT-4V. Ongoing monitoring, transparency, and public engagement will be critical to ensuring these models remain well-aligned with human values over time.
Conclusion
The RLAIF-V approach proposed in this paper represents an innovative step towards aligning extremely large language models with human preferences and values. By leveraging open-source feedback and iterative fine-tuning, the researchers aim to create more trustworthy and beneficial AI systems that can be safely deployed at scale.
While the potential of this approach is promising, further research and rigorous testing will be necessary to address the various challenges and limitations identified in the critical analysis. Maintaining transparency, public engagement, and a commitment to safety and ethics will be crucial as these powerful language models continue to evolve and be integrated into more aspects of our lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
FGAIF: Aligning Large Vision-Language Models with Fine-grained AI Feedback
Liqiang Jing, Xinya Du
0
0
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in tackling a variety of visual-language tasks. However, current LVLMs suffer from misalignment between text and image modalities which causes three kinds of hallucination problems, i.e., object existence, object attribute, and object relationship. To tackle this issue, existing methods mainly utilize Reinforcement Learning (RL) to align modalities in LVLMs. However, they still suffer from three main limitations: (1) General feedback can not indicate the hallucination type contained in the response; (2) Sparse rewards only give the sequence-level reward for the whole response; and (3)Annotation cost is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To handle these limitations, we propose an innovative method to align modalities in LVLMs through Fine-Grained Artificial Intelligence Feedback (FGAIF), which mainly consists of three steps: AI-based Feedback Collection, Fine-grained Reward Model Training, and Reinforcement Learning with Fine-grained Reward. Specifically, We first utilize AI tools to predict the types of hallucination for each segment in the response and obtain a collection of fine-grained feedback. Then, based on the collected reward data, three specialized reward models are trained to produce dense rewards. Finally, a novel fine-grained feedback module is integrated into the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. Extensive experiments are conducted on hallucination and general benchmarks, demonstrating the superior performance of our proposed method. Notably, compared with previous models trained with the RL-based aligning method, our proposed method is effective even with fewer parameters.
4/9/2024
🏅
Tuning Large Multimodal Models for Videos using Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback
Daechul Ahn, Yura Choi, Youngjae Yu, Dongyeop Kang, Jonghyun Choi
0
0
Recent advancements in large language models have influenced the development of video large multimodal models (VLMMs). The previous approaches for VLMMs involved Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with instruction-tuned datasets, integrating LLM with visual encoders, and adding additional learnable modules. Video and text multimodal alignment remains challenging, primarily due to the deficient volume and quality of multimodal instruction-tune data compared to text-only data. We present a novel alignment strategy that employs multimodal AI system to oversee itself called Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF), providing self-preference feedback to refine itself and facilitating the alignment of video and text modalities. In specific, we propose context-aware reward modeling by providing detailed video descriptions as context during the generation of preference feedback in order to enrich the understanding of video content. Demonstrating enhanced performance across diverse video benchmarks, our multimodal RLAIF approach, VLM-RLAIF, outperforms existing approaches, including the SFT model. We commit to open-sourcing our code, models, and datasets to foster further research in this area.
6/18/2024
Multi-objective Reinforcement learning from AI Feedback
Marcus Williams
0
0
This paper presents Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (MORLAIF), a novel approach to improving the alignment and performance of language models trained using reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF). In contrast to standard approaches that train a single preference model to represent all human preferences, MORLAIF decomposes this task into multiple simpler principles, such as toxicity, factuality, and sycophancy. Separate preference models are trained for each principle using feedback from GPT-3.5-Turbo. These preference model scores are then combined using different scalarization functions to provide a reward signal for Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) training of the target language model. Our experiments indicate that MORLAIF outperforms the standard RLAIF baselines and that MORLAIF can be used to align larger language models using smaller ones. Surprisingly, the choice of scalarization function does not appear to significantly impact the results.
6/13/2024
💬
FLAME: Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language Models
Sheng-Chieh Lin, Luyu Gao, Barlas Oguz, Wenhan Xiong, Jimmy Lin, Wen-tau Yih, Xilun Chen
0
0
Alignment is a standard procedure to fine-tune pre-trained large language models (LLMs) to follow natural language instructions and serve as helpful AI assistants. We have observed, however, that the conventional alignment process fails to enhance the factual accuracy of LLMs, and often leads to the generation of more false facts (i.e. hallucination). In this paper, we study how to make the LLM alignment process more factual, by first identifying factors that lead to hallucination in both alignment steps: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL). In particular, we find that training the LLM on new knowledge or unfamiliar texts can encourage hallucination. This makes SFT less factual as it trains on human labeled data that may be novel to the LLM. Furthermore, reward functions used in standard RL can also encourage hallucination, because it guides the LLM to provide more helpful responses on a diverse set of instructions, often preferring longer and more detailed responses. Based on these observations, we propose factuality-aware alignment, comprised of factuality-aware SFT and factuality-aware RL through direct preference optimization. Experiments show that our proposed factuality-aware alignment guides LLMs to output more factual responses while maintaining instruction-following capability.
5/3/2024