Robust Q-Learning under Corrupted Rewards

Overview

• The paper proposes a robust Q-learning algorithm that can handle corrupted rewards.
• It aims to improve the performance of reinforcement learning agents in environments with unreliable or adversarial reward signals.
• The algorithm leverages ideas from robust optimization to mitigate the impact of reward corruption.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning is a powerful technique where an agent learns to make good decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties for its actions. However, in real-world situations, the rewards the agent receives may not always be accurate or reliable. This could be due to sensor errors, adversarial attacks, or other issues.

The authors of this paper present a new algorithm called Robust Q-Learning that helps the agent learn effectively even when the rewards are corrupted or unreliable. The key idea is to treat the reward as an uncertain quantity and use techniques from robust optimization to make the learning process more resilient to reward corruption.

Instead of blindly trusting the observed rewards, the algorithm considers a range of possible reward values and tries to find the best action that works well across this range. This helps the agent make good decisions even when the true rewards are obscured by noise or adversarial tampering.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on several reinforcement learning benchmarks. They show that Robust Q-Learning can significantly outperform standard Q-Learning when the rewards are corrupted, while still performing well when the rewards are accurate.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the reinforcement learning problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) with an unknown reward function. It then introduces the concept of reward ambiguity, where the true reward function is assumed to lie within a set of possible reward functions.

The authors propose a Robust Q-Learning algorithm that learns the optimal policy by considering this set of possible rewards, rather than just the observed rewards. Specifically, the algorithm maintains a Q-function that represents the expected return under the worst-case reward function in the ambiguity set.

The update rule for the Q-function is derived using a robust Bellman operator, which ensures that the Q-values are optimized for the worst-case reward function. This makes the learning process more resilient to reward corruption, as the agent focuses on actions that perform well regardless of the true reward signal.

The authors provide a theoretical analysis of their algorithm, proving bounds on the sample complexity and the sub-optimality gap compared to the true optimal policy. They also demonstrate the practical effectiveness of Robust Q-Learning through experiments on several reinforcement learning benchmarks, including classic control tasks and a simulated robot navigation problem.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and theoretically grounded approach to making reinforcement learning more robust to corrupted rewards. The authors acknowledge several limitations and potential areas for future research:

1. Ambiguity Set Selection: The performance of Robust Q-Learning depends on the choice of the reward ambiguity set. The paper provides a method for constructing this set, but more investigation is needed to understand the impact of different ambiguity set designs.

2. Computational Complexity: The robust Bellman update can be computationally intensive, especially for large state-action spaces. The authors suggest exploring approximation techniques to make the algorithm more scalable.

3. Generalization to Other Robust RL Algorithms: The ideas presented in this paper could potentially be applied to other reinforcement learning algorithms, such as actor-critic methods or policy gradient techniques. Extending the Robust Q-Learning approach to these domains could further broaden its applicability.

4. Real-World Deployment: While the experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of Robust Q-Learning in simulated environments, more research is needed to understand its performance in real-world applications with complex, dynamic reward structures.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of robust reinforcement learning and provides a promising direction for improving the reliability and safety of autonomous agents operating in uncertain or adversarial environments.

Conclusion

The "Robust Q-Learning under Corrupted Rewards" paper presents a novel algorithm that enables reinforcement learning agents to learn effective policies even when the reward signals they receive are corrupted or unreliable. By considering a range of possible reward functions and optimizing for the worst-case scenario, the Robust Q-Learning approach makes the learning process more resilient to reward manipulation or sensor errors.

The theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrate the advantages of this approach over standard Q-Learning, particularly in environments with adversarial or unreliable rewards. While the method has some limitations in terms of computational complexity and ambiguity set selection, the key ideas introduced in this paper could be further developed and applied to other reinforcement learning algorithms, potentially leading to more robust and reliable autonomous systems.