Robust, randomized preconditioning for kernel ridge regression

Read original: arXiv:2304.12465 - Published 7/12/2024 by Mateo D'iaz, Ethan N. Epperly, Zachary Frangella, Joel A. Tropp, Robert J. Webber

↗️

Overview

This paper explores two new randomized preconditioning techniques for solving kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with medium to large datasets.
The first method, RPCholesky preconditioning, can accurately solve the full-data KRR problem in quadratic time, assuming the kernel matrix eigenvalues decay rapidly.
The second method, KRILL preconditioning, offers an accurate solution to a restricted version of the KRR problem involving a subset of the data at a lower computational cost.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes two new approaches to solve a machine learning technique called kernel ridge regression (KRR) more efficiently, especially for larger datasets. KRR is a type of regression that can capture complex, non-linear relationships in data.

The first method, RPCholesky preconditioning, is able to accurately solve the complete KRR problem in a reasonable amount of time, as long as the kernel matrix (which captures the relationships in the data) has eigenvalues that decay quickly. This means the method can work well for a wide range of KRR problems.

The second method, KRILL preconditioning, doesn't solve the full KRR problem, but instead focuses on a restricted version that only uses a subset of the data. This limited version is still useful in many practical applications and can be solved much faster than the complete problem.

Both of these new techniques represent significant improvements in how efficiently KRR problems can be solved, especially for large datasets. This makes them valuable tools for real-world applications of machine learning.

Technical Explanation

This paper introduces two new randomized preconditioning techniques for efficiently solving kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with medium to large datasets (10,000 to 10 million data points).

The first method, called RPCholesky preconditioning, can accurately solve the full-data KRR problem in quadratic time (O(N^2) operations), assuming the eigenvalues of the kernel matrix decay rapidly enough. This represents a significant improvement over the typical cubic time complexity (O(N^3)) of directly solving the KRR system.

The second method, called KRILL preconditioning, provides an accurate solution to a restricted version of the KRR problem that only involves a subset of k << N selected data centers. This reduced problem can be solved in O((N + k^2) k log k) time, which is much faster than solving the full KRR system.

Both of these new preconditioning techniques leverage randomized linear algebra approaches to efficiently approximate and solve the KRR problem. The RPCholesky method uses a randomized Cholesky decomposition, while the KRILL method employs a randomized low-rank approximation to the kernel matrix.

The proposed methods are shown to solve a broad range of KRR problems with state-of-the-art performance, making them well-suited for practical applications of kernel-based machine learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the two new preconditioning methods, including their theoretical guarantees, computational complexities, and empirical performance on a variety of KRR problems. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

The RPCholesky method relies on the assumption of rapid eigenvalue decay in the kernel matrix, which may not hold true for all types of kernels and datasets. Further research could explore the method's robustness to different kernel choices and data distributions.
The KRILL method solves a restricted version of the KRR problem, which may not be suitable for all applications. The paper does not provide a clear guideline for how to choose the appropriate subset size (k) for a given problem, which could be an area for future investigation.
While the methods demonstrate strong performance on the tested benchmarks, it would be valuable to see how they scale and perform on even larger, more diverse datasets that are representative of real-world machine learning problems.
The paper does not discuss the practical implications or potential use cases for these new preconditioning techniques beyond the KRR problem. Exploring how they could be adapted or extended to other linear systems or machine learning tasks would be an interesting direction for future research.

Overall, the paper presents two promising new approaches for efficiently solving KRR problems, but further research and analysis could help to fully understand their strengths, limitations, and broader applicability.

Conclusion

This paper introduces two novel randomized preconditioning techniques, RPCholesky and KRILL, that can solve kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with medium to large datasets much more efficiently than traditional methods.

The RPCholesky method can accurately solve the full-data KRR problem in quadratic time, while the KRILL method offers a fast solution to a restricted version of the problem involving a subset of the data. Both techniques leverage advanced randomized linear algebra concepts to approximate and solve the KRR system in a computationally efficient manner.

These new preconditioning methods represent significant advancements in the field of kernel-based machine learning, as they enable KRR problems to be solved much more quickly, especially for large-scale datasets. This makes them valuable tools for practical applications that require accurate and efficient regression models.

The paper provides a thorough technical analysis of the methods, as well as a discussion of their limitations and potential areas for future research. Overall, this work contributes important new techniques that can expand the practical applicability of kernel ridge regression in real-world settings.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Robust, randomized preconditioning for kernel ridge regression

Mateo D'iaz, Ethan N. Epperly, Zachary Frangella, Joel A. Tropp, Robert J. Webber

This paper investigates two randomized preconditioning techniques for solving kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with a medium to large number of data points ($10^4 leq N leq 10^7$), and it introduces two new methods with state-of-the-art performance. The first method, RPCholesky preconditioning, accurately solves the full-data KRR problem in $O(N^2)$ arithmetic operations, assuming sufficiently rapid polynomial decay of the kernel matrix eigenvalues. The second method, KRILL preconditioning, offers an accurate solution to a restricted version of the KRR problem involving $k ll N$ selected data centers at a cost of $O((N + k^2) k log k)$ operations. The proposed methods solve a broad range of KRR problems, making them ideal for practical applications.

7/12/2024

Have ASkotch: Fast Methods for Large-scale, Memory-constrained Kernel Ridge Regression

Pratik Rathore, Zachary Frangella, Madeleine Udell

Kernel ridge regression (KRR) is a fundamental computational tool, appearing in problems that range from computational chemistry to health analytics, with a particular interest due to its starring role in Gaussian process regression. However, it is challenging to scale KRR solvers to large datasets: with $n$ training points, a direct solver (i.e., Cholesky decomposition) uses $O(n^2)$ storage and $O(n^3)$ flops. Iterative methods for KRR, such as preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG), avoid the cubic scaling of direct solvers and often use low-rank preconditioners; a rank $r$ preconditioner uses $O(rn)$ storage and each iteration requires $O(n^2)$ flops. To reduce the storage and iteration complexity of iterative solvers for KRR, we propose ASkotch ($textbf{A}$ccelerated $textbf{s}$calable $textbf{k}$ernel $textbf{o}$p$textbf{t}$imization using block $textbf{c}$oordinate descent with $textbf{H}$essian preconditioning). For a given block size $|b| << n$, each iteration of ASkotch uses $O(r|b| + n)$ storage and $O(n|b|)$ flops, so ASkotch scales better than Cholesky decomposition and PCG. We prove that ASkotch obtains linear convergence to the optimum, with the convergence rate depending on the square roots of the $textit{preconditioned}$ block condition numbers. Furthermore, we solve KRR problems that were considered to be impossibly large while using limited computational resources: we show that ASkotch outperforms PCG methods with respect to generalization error on large-scale KRR (up to $n = 10^8$) and KRR classification tasks (up to $n = 10^7$) while running each of our experiments on $textit{a single 12 GB Titan V GPU}$. Our work opens up the possibility of as-yet-unimagined applications of KRR across a wide range of disciplines.

7/16/2024

↗️

Universality of kernel random matrices and kernel regression in the quadratic regime

Parthe Pandit, Zhichao Wang, Yizhe Zhu

Kernel ridge regression (KRR) is a popular class of machine learning models that has become an important tool for understanding deep learning. Much of the focus has been on studying the proportional asymptotic regime, $n asymp d$, where $n$ is the number of training samples and $d$ is the dimension of the dataset. In this regime, under certain conditions on the data distribution, the kernel random matrix involved in KRR exhibits behavior akin to that of a linear kernel. In this work, we extend the study of kernel regression to the quadratic asymptotic regime, where $n asymp d^2$. In this regime, we demonstrate that a broad class of inner-product kernels exhibit behavior similar to a quadratic kernel. Specifically, we establish an operator norm approximation bound for the difference between the original kernel random matrix and a quadratic kernel random matrix with additional correction terms compared to the Taylor expansion of the kernel functions. The approximation works for general data distributions under a Gaussian-moment-matching assumption with a covariance structure. This new approximation is utilized to obtain a limiting spectral distribution of the original kernel matrix and characterize the precise asymptotic training and generalization errors for KRR in the quadratic regime when $n/d^2$ converges to a non-zero constant. The generalization errors are obtained for both deterministic and random teacher models. Our proof techniques combine moment methods, Wick's formula, orthogonal polynomials, and resolvent analysis of random matrices with correlated entries.

8/6/2024

🚀

Improving Implicit Regularization of SGD with Preconditioning for Least Square Problems

Junwei Su, Difan Zou, Chuan Wu

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) exhibits strong algorithmic regularization effects in practice and plays an important role in the generalization of modern machine learning. However, prior research has revealed instances where the generalization performance of SGD is worse than ridge regression due to uneven optimization along different dimensions. Preconditioning offers a natural solution to this issue by rebalancing optimization across different directions. Yet, the extent to which preconditioning can enhance the generalization performance of SGD and whether it can bridge the existing gap with ridge regression remains uncertain. In this paper, we study the generalization performance of SGD with preconditioning for the least squared problem. We make a comprehensive comparison between preconditioned SGD and (standard & preconditioned) ridge regression. Our study makes several key contributions toward understanding and improving SGD with preconditioning. First, we establish excess risk bounds (generalization performance) for preconditioned SGD and ridge regression under an arbitrary preconditions matrix. Second, leveraging the excessive risk characterization of preconditioned SGD and ridge regression, we show that (through construction) there exists a simple preconditioned matrix that can make SGD comparable to (standard & preconditioned) ridge regression. Finally, we show that our proposed preconditioning matrix is straightforward enough to allow robust estimation from finite samples while maintaining a theoretical improvement. Our empirical results align with our theoretical findings, collectively showcasing the enhanced regularization effect of preconditioned SGD.

5/28/2024