Universality of kernel random matrices and kernel regression in the quadratic regime

Read original: arXiv:2408.01062 - Published 8/6/2024 by Parthe Pandit, Zhichao Wang, Yizhe Zhu

↗️

Overview

Kernel ridge regression (KRR) is a popular machine learning model used to understand deep learning.
Much of the focus has been on the proportional asymptotic regime where the number of training samples (n) is similar to the data dimension (d).
This paper extends the study of kernel regression to the quadratic asymptotic regime where n scales with d^2.

Plain English Explanation

Kernel ridge regression (KRR) is a type of machine learning model that has become an important tool for understanding how deep learning models work. A lot of research on KRR has focused on a specific setting where the number of training samples (n) is roughly the same as the data dimension (d).

In this paper, the researchers looked at a different setting where the number of training samples (n) is proportional to the square of the data dimension (d^2). They found that for a broad class of kernel functions, the behavior of the KRR model in this quadratic regime is similar to using a quadratic kernel instead of the original kernel.

The researchers developed a mathematical approximation that captures this behavior, which they used to analyze the training and generalization performance of KRR in the quadratic regime. This provides insights into how KRR and related models might behave when the dataset is very high-dimensional compared to the number of training samples.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contributions of this paper are:

Kernel Approximation: The researchers established an operator norm approximation bound for the difference between the original kernel random matrix and a quadratic kernel random matrix, plus some additional correction terms. This approximation holds for general data distributions under a Gaussian-moment-matching assumption.
Spectral Analysis: The researchers used this new approximation to obtain the limiting spectral distribution of the original kernel matrix in the quadratic asymptotic regime. This allows them to characterize the precise asymptotic training and generalization errors for KRR.
Generalization Analysis: The generalization error analysis covers both deterministic and random teacher models, which differ in how the true underlying function is generated.

The proofs combine several advanced mathematical techniques, including moment methods, Wick's formula, orthogonal polynomials, and resolvent analysis of random matrices with correlated entries.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous and technically sophisticated analysis of kernel ridge regression in the quadratic asymptotic regime. The key assumptions, such as Gaussian-moment-matching, may limit the generality of the results, but the authors acknowledge this and discuss potential extensions.

One limitation is that the analysis focuses on the population-level behavior of KRR, whereas in practice, one must deal with finite samples. The researchers mention that an important next step would be to study the finite-sample performance and how it relates to the asymptotic results.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much intuition or interpretation for the practical implications of the findings. Further work could explore how these theoretical insights might inform the design and application of kernel-based models in real-world, high-dimensional settings.

Conclusion

This paper extends the understanding of kernel ridge regression by characterizing its behavior in the quadratic asymptotic regime, where the number of training samples scales with the square of the data dimension. The key technical contribution is a novel kernel approximation that allows for a detailed analysis of the training and generalization performance of KRR in this high-dimensional setting.

While the analysis relies on some strong assumptions, the results provide valuable theoretical insights that could inform the development and application of kernel-based machine learning models, especially in domains where data dimensionality is a critical challenge.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Universality of kernel random matrices and kernel regression in the quadratic regime

Parthe Pandit, Zhichao Wang, Yizhe Zhu

Kernel ridge regression (KRR) is a popular class of machine learning models that has become an important tool for understanding deep learning. Much of the focus has been on studying the proportional asymptotic regime, $n asymp d$, where $n$ is the number of training samples and $d$ is the dimension of the dataset. In this regime, under certain conditions on the data distribution, the kernel random matrix involved in KRR exhibits behavior akin to that of a linear kernel. In this work, we extend the study of kernel regression to the quadratic asymptotic regime, where $n asymp d^2$. In this regime, we demonstrate that a broad class of inner-product kernels exhibit behavior similar to a quadratic kernel. Specifically, we establish an operator norm approximation bound for the difference between the original kernel random matrix and a quadratic kernel random matrix with additional correction terms compared to the Taylor expansion of the kernel functions. The approximation works for general data distributions under a Gaussian-moment-matching assumption with a covariance structure. This new approximation is utilized to obtain a limiting spectral distribution of the original kernel matrix and characterize the precise asymptotic training and generalization errors for KRR in the quadratic regime when $n/d^2$ converges to a non-zero constant. The generalization errors are obtained for both deterministic and random teacher models. Our proof techniques combine moment methods, Wick's formula, orthogonal polynomials, and resolvent analysis of random matrices with correlated entries.

8/6/2024

↗️

Optimal Rate of Kernel Regression in Large Dimensions

Weihao Lu, Haobo Zhang, Yicheng Li, Manyun Xu, Qian Lin

We perform a study on kernel regression for large-dimensional data (where the sample size $n$ is polynomially depending on the dimension $d$ of the samples, i.e., $nasymp d^{gamma}$ for some $gamma >0$ ). We first build a general tool to characterize the upper bound and the minimax lower bound of kernel regression for large dimensional data through the Mendelson complexity $varepsilon_{n}^{2}$ and the metric entropy $bar{varepsilon}_{n}^{2}$ respectively. When the target function falls into the RKHS associated with a (general) inner product model defined on $mathbb{S}^{d}$, we utilize the new tool to show that the minimax rate of the excess risk of kernel regression is $n^{-1/2}$ when $nasymp d^{gamma}$ for $gamma =2, 4, 6, 8, cdots$. We then further determine the optimal rate of the excess risk of kernel regression for all the $gamma>0$ and find that the curve of optimal rate varying along $gamma$ exhibits several new phenomena including the multiple descent behavior and the periodic plateau behavior. As an application, For the neural tangent kernel (NTK), we also provide a similar explicit description of the curve of optimal rate. As a direct corollary, we know these claims hold for wide neural networks as well.

7/1/2024

Optimal Kernel Quantile Learning with Random Features

Caixing Wang, Xingdong Feng

The random feature (RF) approach is a well-established and efficient tool for scalable kernel methods, but existing literature has primarily focused on kernel ridge regression with random features (KRR-RF), which has limitations in handling heterogeneous data with heavy-tailed noises. This paper presents a generalization study of kernel quantile regression with random features (KQR-RF), which accounts for the non-smoothness of the check loss in KQR-RF by introducing a refined error decomposition and establishing a novel connection between KQR-RF and KRR-RF. Our study establishes the capacity-dependent learning rates for KQR-RF under mild conditions on the number of RFs, which are minimax optimal up to some logarithmic factors. Importantly, our theoretical results, utilizing a data-dependent sampling strategy, can be extended to cover the agnostic setting where the target quantile function may not precisely align with the assumed kernel space. By slightly modifying our assumptions, the capacity-dependent error analysis can also be applied to cases with Lipschitz continuous losses, enabling broader applications in the machine learning community. To validate our theoretical findings, simulated experiments and a real data application are conducted.

8/27/2024

↗️

Learning Analysis of Kernel Ridgeless Regression with Asymmetric Kernel Learning

Fan He, Mingzhen He, Lei Shi, Xiaolin Huang, Johan A. K. Suykens

Ridgeless regression has garnered attention among researchers, particularly in light of the ``Benign Overfitting'' phenomenon, where models interpolating noisy samples demonstrate robust generalization. However, kernel ridgeless regression does not always perform well due to the lack of flexibility. This paper enhances kernel ridgeless regression with Locally-Adaptive-Bandwidths (LAB) RBF kernels, incorporating kernel learning techniques to improve performance in both experiments and theory. For the first time, we demonstrate that functions learned from LAB RBF kernels belong to an integral space of Reproducible Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHSs). Despite the absence of explicit regularization in the proposed model, its optimization is equivalent to solving an $ell_0$-regularized problem in the integral space of RKHSs, elucidating the origin of its generalization ability. Taking an approximation analysis viewpoint, we introduce an $l_q$-norm analysis technique (with $0<q<1$) to derive the learning rate for the proposed model under mild conditions. This result deepens our theoretical understanding, explaining that our algorithm's robust approximation ability arises from the large capacity of the integral space of RKHSs, while its generalization ability is ensured by sparsity, controlled by the number of support vectors. Experimental results on both synthetic and real datasets validate our theoretical conclusions.

6/4/2024