Robustly estimating heterogeneity in factorial data using Rashomon Partitions

Overview

• Researchers often analyze how an outcome of interest varies with different combinations of observable factors (covariates).
• Existing approaches either search for a single "optimal" partition of the covariate space or sample from all possible partitions.
• These methods ignore the reality that many different partitions may be statistically indistinguishable, despite having very different implications.
• The paper proposes an alternative approach called Rashomon Partition Sets (RPSs) to address this issue.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you're a doctor trying to understand how different drug combinations affect a patient's health. Or you're a sociologist studying how technology adoption depends on factors like incentives and demographics. In situations like these, researchers often want to understand how an outcome of interest (like health or technology use) varies with different combinations of observable factors (like drugs or demographics).

Existing methods for analyzing this type of data have limitations. Some approaches try to find a single "best" way to partition the space of factors, making assumptions about how the factors are related. Others simply sample from all the possible ways to divide up the factor space. But the reality is that there are often many statistically equivalent ways to partition the factor space, even though those partitions have very different real-world implications.

The new approach proposed in this paper, called Rashomon Partition Sets (RPSs), aims to address this issue. Instead of searching for a single optimal partition or randomly sampling from all possible partitions, RPSs incorporate all the partitions that are statistically similar to the best one. This gives a more complete picture of how the outcome varies with the different factor combinations, without making assumptions about the relationships between the factors.

The key innovation is using a specific type of statistical prior (called an $\ell_0$ prior) that makes no assumptions about how the factors are related. This prior helps the researchers identify all the plausible partitions of the factor space, rather than just one. Once they have this set of partitions, they can calculate the probability of any interesting outcome (like the effect of a drug combination) across all the partitions in the set.

By considering multiple statistically equivalent partitions, this approach allows for more robust conclusions than conventional methods that focus on a single "optimal" partition. The researchers demonstrate the benefits of this approach through simulations and real-world case studies on topics like charitable giving, chromosomal structure, and microfinance.

Technical Explanation

The paper addresses the common statistical problem of understanding how an outcome of interest varies with combinations of observable covariates. This could involve questions like: How do various drug combinations affect health outcomes? Or how does technology adoption depend on incentives and demographics?

Existing approaches to this problem fall into two main categories:

1. Searching for a single "optimal" partition of the covariate space, under assumptions about the associations between covariates.
2. Sampling from the entire set of possible partitions.

Both of these approaches have limitations, as they ignore the reality that many statistically equivalent partitions may exist, even though they have very different implications for policy or science.

To address this, the authors propose an alternative framework called Rashomon Partition Sets (RPSs). Each RPS contains a set of partitions of the covariate space that have similar posterior probability values, even if they offer substantively different explanations. Crucially, the prior used to define the RPS makes no assumptions about associations between covariates.

Specifically, the authors use the $\ell_0$ prior, which they show is minimax optimal for this problem. Given the RPS, they can then calculate the posterior probability of any measurable function of the feature effects on the outcome, conditional on being in the RPS.

The authors also characterize the approximation error of the RPS relative to the entire posterior distribution, and provide bounds on the size of the RPS. Simulations demonstrate that this framework allows for more robust conclusions compared to conventional regularization techniques.

The authors apply their RPS method to three empirical case studies: analyzing price effects on charitable giving, investigating chromosomal structure (telomere length), and studying the introduction of microfinance.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations of their approach. First, the computational complexity of identifying the RPS can be challenging, especially for high-dimensional covariate spaces. They note that future research is needed to develop more scalable algorithms.

Additionally, the $\ell_0$ prior used to define the RPS may be sensitive to the specific choice of tuning parameters. The authors suggest exploring alternative priors that can incorporate subject-matter knowledge about the relationships between covariates.

While the RPS framework offers a more comprehensive view of plausible partitions compared to single-partition methods, it does not guarantee that the true data-generating process is contained within the RPS. There may still be partitions outside the RPS that are also statistically viable.

Finally, the authors emphasize that the RPS should be interpreted as a sensitivity analysis, rather than a definitive answer. Researchers should still critically examine the substantive implications of the different partitions within the RPS and how they align with domain knowledge.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel statistical framework called Rashomon Partition Sets (RPSs) to address the challenge of understanding how an outcome of interest varies with combinations of observable covariates. By considering a set of statistically equivalent partitions of the covariate space, rather than a single "optimal" partition, the RPS approach allows for more robust conclusions that account for the inherent uncertainty in these types of analyses.

The key innovation is the use of a prior that makes no assumptions about the relationships between covariates, enabling the identification of a diverse set of plausible partitions. This is an important advance over existing methods that either search for a single partition or randomly sample from all possibilities.

While the RPS framework has some computational and methodological limitations, it represents a significant step forward in providing a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of how outcomes vary with complex combinations of factors. As researchers continue to grapple with such questions across various domains, tools like RPSs will become increasingly valuable for informing policy decisions and advancing scientific knowledge.