Local Discovery by Partitioning: Polynomial-Time Causal Discovery Around Exposure-Outcome Pairs

Overview

• Causal discovery is crucial for causal inference in observational studies
• Identifying valid adjustment sets (VAS) is important for unbiased effect estimation
• Global causal discovery is challenging in the nonparametric setting, with high time and sample complexity
• To address this, the paper proposes a local causal discovery method called Local Discovery by Partitioning (LDP)

Plain English Explanation

Causal discovery is the process of identifying the underlying causal relationships between variables in a dataset. This is an important step for causal inference in observational studies, as it can help determine the valid adjustment sets (VAS) needed to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome without bias.

However, discovering the complete causal structure of a system, known as global causal discovery, is notoriously difficult, especially in situations where the relationships between variables are not easily modeled using parametric assumptions. This process can be computationally intensive and require a large amount of data.

To overcome these challenges, the researchers propose a new method called Local Discovery by Partitioning (LDP). LDP is a local causal discovery approach, meaning it focuses on identifying the causal relationships relevant to a specific exposure-outcome pair, rather than attempting to uncover the full causal graph. This makes it more efficient and tailored for downstream inference tasks, without requiring strict parametric or pretreatment assumptions.

The key idea behind LDP is to partition the variable set into smaller, more manageable subsets, and then perform causal discovery within each partition. This local approach significantly reduces the computational complexity compared to global causal discovery methods, while still providing theoretical guarantees for identifying a valid adjustment set under certain conditions.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel causal discovery method called Local Discovery by Partitioning (LDP). LDP is a constraint-based procedure that returns a valid adjustment set (VAS) for estimating the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome, even in the presence of latent confounding.

The main idea behind LDP is to partition the variable set into smaller, more manageable subsets, and then perform causal discovery within each partition. This local approach significantly reduces the computational complexity compared to global causal discovery methods, while still providing theoretical guarantees for identifying a VAS under sufficient conditions.

The key steps of the LDP algorithm are:

1. Partitioning the variable set into smaller subsets
2. Performing conditional independence tests within each partition
3. Combining the results to identify a VAS for the exposure-outcome pair

The total number of independence tests performed by LDP is worst-case quadratic with respect to the number of variables, which is a significant improvement over global causal discovery methods that can have exponential time and sample complexity.

The authors provide asymptotic theoretical guarantees for LDP and validate them through extensive experiments on synthetic data. They show that adjustment sets obtained from LDP yield less biased and more precise average treatment effect estimates compared to baseline causal discovery algorithms, with LDP outperforming on metrics like confounder recall, runtime, and test count for VAS discovery.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to causal discovery that addresses some of the key limitations of existing global methods. By focusing on local discovery tailored for specific exposure-outcome pairs, LDP can be more computationally efficient and effective for downstream inference tasks.

One potential limitation of the LDP approach is that it relies on the assumption of sufficient conditions for identifying a valid adjustment set. While the authors provide theoretical guarantees under these conditions, in practice, the assumptions may not always hold, and there could be cases where LDP fails to identify a valid adjustment set.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the performance of LDP in the presence of complex causal structures, such as those involving latent class confounding or adaptive experimental design. It would be valuable to see how LDP compares to other causal discovery methods in these more challenging scenarios.

Furthermore, the paper focuses on the theoretical and experimental evaluation of LDP, but does not provide much discussion on the practical implications or potential applications of the method. It would be interesting to see how LDP could be leveraged for estimating causal effects in real-world observational studies or how it could be integrated with other causal inference techniques, such as robust heterogeneity estimation.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel local causal discovery method called LDP that addresses some of the key challenges of global causal discovery in the nonparametric setting. By partitioning the variable set and performing constrained-based discovery within each partition, LDP can efficiently identify valid adjustment sets for unbiased effect estimation, with strong theoretical guarantees and empirical performance.

While the method has some limitations, the core ideas behind LDP represent an important step forward in the field of causal inference, particularly for observational studies where global causal discovery is often intractable. The authors' work lays the foundation for further research and applications of local causal discovery techniques in a wide range of domains.