Robustness Analysis of AI Models in Critical Energy Systems
2406.14361
0
0
Abstract
This paper analyzes the robustness of state-of-the-art AI-based models for power grid operations under the $N-1$ security criterion. While these models perform well in regular grid settings, our results highlight a significant loss in accuracy following the disconnection of a line.%under this security criterion. Using graph theory-based analysis, we demonstrate the impact of node connectivity on this loss. Our findings emphasize the need for practical scenario considerations in developing AI methodologies for critical infrastructure.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a robustness analysis of AI models used in critical energy systems, such as power grids.
- The researchers investigate how AI models, particularly graph neural networks, perform under various types of perturbations and adversarial attacks.
- The goal is to understand the reliability and security of these AI systems when deployed in real-world critical infrastructure like power grids.
Plain English Explanation
Power grids are essential infrastructure that we rely on every day. AI models are increasingly being used to help manage and optimize these complex power grid systems. However, it's important to ensure these AI models are robust and can withstand disturbances or attacks that could disrupt the power grid.
The researchers in this paper looked at how well different AI models, especially a type called graph neural networks, perform under stress. They simulated various types of problems or attacks that could happen, like changes to the power grid structure or unexpected spikes in electricity demand. This helps understand how reliable and secure these AI systems are when deployed in critical energy infrastructure.
The researchers found that the AI models had varying levels of robustness depending on the type of perturbation. Some models were quite resilient, while others struggled more. This information is valuable for ensuring these AI systems maintain reliable and secure operation of power grids in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates the robustness of AI models, particularly graph neural networks (GNNs), in the context of critical energy systems like power grids. The researchers simulated various types of perturbations and adversarial attacks on power grid data and analyzed the performance degradation of different GNN architectures.
The perturbations included structural changes to the power grid graph, such as edge removals and node feature manipulations. They also explored demand spikes and other operational challenges. The goal was to assess the reliability and security of these AI models when deployed in real-world critical infrastructure.
The results showed that the robustness of GNNs varied depending on the type and severity of the perturbation. Some architectures were more resilient to certain types of attacks, while others struggled more. The researchers also explored explainable AI techniques to better understand the vulnerabilities of these models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the robustness of AI models used in critical energy systems, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. The simulated perturbations and attacks, while realistic, may not fully capture the complexity and unpredictability of real-world scenarios.
Additionally, the researchers focused primarily on GNN architectures, which may not be representative of all AI models used in power grid applications. Further exploration of other model types and their robustness would be beneficial.
The paper also touches on the importance of explainable AI for understanding model vulnerabilities, but more work is needed to develop reliable and interpretable techniques in this domain.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of AI model robustness in critical energy systems. The researchers have demonstrated that the reliability and security of these AI systems can vary depending on the type and severity of perturbations and attacks.
The findings from this work can help inform the development and deployment of more robust and secure AI models for power grid management and optimization. This is crucial for ensuring the resilience of our critical energy infrastructure in the face of various challenges and threats.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Graph neural networks for power grid operational risk assessment under evolving grid topology
Yadong Zhang, Pranav M Karve, Sankaran Mahadevan
0
0
This article investigates the ability of graph neural networks (GNNs) to identify risky conditions in a power grid over the subsequent few hours, without explicit, high-resolution information regarding future generator on/off status (grid topology) or power dispatch decisions. The GNNs are trained using supervised learning, to predict the power grid's aggregated bus-level (either zonal or system-level) or individual branch-level state under different power supply and demand conditions. The variability of the stochastic grid variables (wind/solar generation and load demand), and their statistical correlations, are rigorously considered while generating the inputs for the training data. The outputs in the training data, obtained by solving numerous mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimal power flow problems, correspond to system-level, zonal and transmission line-level quantities of interest (QoIs). The QoIs predicted by the GNNs are used to conduct hours-ahead, sampling-based reliability and risk assessment w.r.t. zonal and system-level (load shedding) as well as branch-level (overloading) failure events. The proposed methodology is demonstrated for three synthetic grids with sizes ranging from 118 to 2848 buses. Our results demonstrate that GNNs are capable of providing fast and accurate prediction of QoIs and can be good proxies for computationally expensive MILP algorithms. The excellent accuracy of GNN-based reliability and risk assessment suggests that GNN models can substantially improve situational awareness by quickly providing rigorous reliability and risk estimates.
5/14/2024
🔎
Fault Detection for agents on power grid topology optimization: A Comprehensive analysis
Malte Lehna, Mohamed Hassouna, Dmitry Degtyar, Sven Tomforde, Christoph Scholz
0
0
The topology optimization of transmission networks using Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has increasingly come into focus. Various researchers have proposed different DRL agents, which are often benchmarked on the Grid2Op environment from the Learning to Run a Power Network (L2RPN) challenges. The environments have many advantages with their realistic chronics and underlying power flow backends. However, the interpretation of agent survival or failure is not always clear, as there are a variety of potential causes. In this work, we focus on the failures of the power grid to identify patterns and detect them a priori. We collect the failed chronics of three different agents on the WCCI 2022 L2RPN environment, totaling about 40k data points. By clustering, we are able to detect five distinct clusters, identifying different failure types. Further, we propose a multi-class prediction approach to detect failures beforehand and evaluate five different models. Here, the Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM) shows the best performance, with an accuracy of 86%. It also correctly identifies in 91% of the time failure and survival observations. Finally, we provide a detailed feature importance analysis that identifies critical features and regions in the grid.
6/26/2024
🧠
PowerGraph: A power grid benchmark dataset for graph neural networks
Anna Varbella, Kenza Amara, Blazhe Gjorgiev, Mennatallah El-Assady, Giovanni Sansavini
0
0
Power grids are critical infrastructures of paramount importance to modern society and, therefore, engineered to operate under diverse conditions and failures. The ongoing energy transition poses new challenges for the decision-makers and system operators. Therefore, we must develop grid analysis algorithms to ensure reliable operations. These key tools include power flow analysis and system security analysis, both needed for effective operational and strategic planning. The literature review shows a growing trend of machine learning (ML) models that perform these analyses effectively. In particular, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) stand out in such applications because of the graph-based structure of power grids. However, there is a lack of publicly available graph datasets for training and benchmarking ML models in electrical power grid applications. First, we present PowerGraph, which comprises GNN-tailored datasets for i) power flows, ii) optimal power flows, and iii) cascading failure analyses of power grids. Second, we provide ground-truth explanations for the cascading failure analysis. Finally, we perform a complete benchmarking of GNN methods for node-level and graph-level tasks and explainability. Overall, PowerGraph is a multifaceted GNN dataset for diverse tasks that includes power flow and fault scenarios with real-world explanations, providing a valuable resource for developing improved GNN models for node-level, graph-level tasks and explainability methods in power system modeling. The dataset is available at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/PowerGraph/22820534 and the code at https://github.com/PowerGraph-Datasets.
6/4/2024
🤖
Exploding AI Power Use: an Opportunity to Rethink Grid Planning and Management
Liuzixuan Lin, Rajini Wijayawardana, Varsha Rao, Hai Nguyen, Wedan Emmanuel Gnibga, Andrew A. Chien
0
0
The unprecedented rapid growth of computing demand for AI is projected to increase global annual datacenter (DC) growth from 7.2% to 11.3%. We project the 5-year AI DC demand for several power grids and assess whether they will allow desired AI growth (resource adequacy). If not, several desperate measures -- grid policies that enable more load growth and maintain grid reliability by sacrificing new DC reliability are considered. We find that two DC hotspots -- EirGrid (Ireland) and Dominion (US) -- will have difficulty accommodating new DCs needed by the AI growth. In EirGrid, relaxing new DC reliability guarantees increases the power available to 1.6x--4.1x while maintaining 99.6% actual power availability for the new DCs, sufficient for the 5-year AI demand. In Dominion, relaxing reliability guarantees increases available DC capacity similarly (1.5x--4.6x) but not enough for the 5-year AI demand. New DCs only receive 89% power availability. Study of other US power grids -- SPP, CAISO, ERCOT -- shows that sufficient capacity exists for the projected AI load growth. Our results suggest the need to rethink adequacy assessment and also grid planning and management. New research opportunities include coordinated planning, reliability models that incorporate load flexibility, and adaptive load abstractions.
5/1/2024