Explainable AI Security: Exploring Robustness of Graph Neural Networks to Adversarial Attacks

Read original: arXiv:2406.13920 - Published 6/21/2024 by Tao Wu, Canyixing Cui, Xingping Xian, Shaojie Qiao, Chao Wang, Lin Yuan, Shui Yu
Total Score

0

Explainable AI Security: Exploring Robustness of Graph Neural Networks to Adversarial Attacks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the robustness of graph neural networks (GNNs) to adversarial attacks, where small perturbations to the input can cause the model to misclassify.
  • The researchers investigate the decision boundaries of GNNs and how they are affected by adversarial attacks, as well as the transferability of adversarial examples across different GNN models.
  • They propose several techniques to improve the adversarial robustness of GNNs, including IDEA: Invariant Defense for Graph Adversarial Robustness and Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire.

Plain English Explanation

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that can learn from data represented as graphs, such as social networks or chemical compounds. While GNNs have shown impressive performance on various tasks, they can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small changes to the input data can cause the model to make incorrect predictions.

This paper explores the robustness of GNNs to these adversarial attacks. The researchers look at how the decision boundaries of GNNs, which determine how the model classifies different inputs, are affected by adversarial perturbations. They also investigate the transferability of adversarial examples, which are inputs that have been modified to fool one model and can potentially also fool other models.

To address these issues, the researchers propose several techniques to improve the adversarial robustness of GNNs. One approach, called IDEA: Invariant Defense for Graph Adversarial Robustness, aims to make the model more resistant to adversarial attacks by ensuring that the decision boundaries are more stable and less sensitive to small changes in the input. Another technique, Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire, focuses on making the model's decision-making process more transparent and interpretable, which can help researchers and users understand why the model is making certain predictions and identify potential vulnerabilities.

Overall, this research is important for improving the security and reliability of GNNs, which have many real-world applications, such as in Graph Neural Network Explanations Are Fragile and Problem Space Structural Adversarial Attacks on Network Intrusion Detection. By understanding the vulnerabilities of these models and developing techniques to make them more robust, researchers can help ensure that GNNs can be safely and reliably deployed in a wide range of applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by exploring the decision boundaries of GNNs and how they are affected by adversarial attacks. The researchers use a technique called Survey of Transferability of Adversarial Examples Across Deep Neural Networks to generate adversarial examples that can fool GNN models. They find that the decision boundaries of GNNs are often highly sensitive to these adversarial perturbations, with small changes to the input leading to large changes in the model's predictions.

To address this issue, the researchers propose two techniques to improve the adversarial robustness of GNNs. The first, IDEA: Invariant Defense for Graph Adversarial Robustness, aims to make the decision boundaries more stable and less sensitive to adversarial perturbations. This is achieved by incorporating an invariance loss term into the model's objective function, which encourages the model to learn representations that are insensitive to small changes in the input.

The second technique, Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire, focuses on making the model's decision-making process more transparent and interpretable. By understanding how the model is making its predictions, researchers and users can better identify potential vulnerabilities and develop more effective defenses against adversarial attacks.

The researchers evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques through a series of experiments on several benchmark datasets and GNN architectures. They find that the proposed methods are able to significantly improve the adversarial robustness of GNNs, with the models demonstrating greater resilience to adversarial attacks while maintaining high performance on standard tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of explainable AI security by exploring the robustness of GNNs to adversarial attacks. The researchers' investigation of the decision boundaries and the transferability of adversarial examples across different GNN models is a important step in understanding the vulnerabilities of these models.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on synthetic adversarial examples, rather than real-world adversarial attacks that may be more subtle and difficult to detect. While the proposed techniques show promise in improving the robustness of GNNs, it would be valuable to further evaluate their effectiveness in more realistic scenarios.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential trade-offs between improving adversarial robustness and maintaining high performance on standard tasks. It would be interesting to explore how the proposed techniques affect the overall performance of GNNs and whether there are any inherent tensions between robustness and accuracy.

Despite these limitations, the paper represents a significant contribution to the field of explainable AI security. By developing techniques to improve the adversarial robustness of GNNs, the researchers are helping to ensure that these models can be safely and reliably deployed in real-world applications, such as Graph Neural Network Explanations Are Fragile and Problem Space Structural Adversarial Attacks on Network Intrusion Detection. This work also highlights the importance of understanding the vulnerabilities of AI systems and developing effective defenses against adversarial attacks.

Conclusion

This paper explores the robustness of graph neural networks (GNNs) to adversarial attacks, where small perturbations to the input can cause the model to misclassify. The researchers investigate the decision boundaries of GNNs and how they are affected by adversarial attacks, as well as the transferability of adversarial examples across different GNN models.

To address these issues, the researchers propose several techniques to improve the adversarial robustness of GNNs, including IDEA: Invariant Defense for Graph Adversarial Robustness and Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire. These techniques aim to make the decision boundaries of GNNs more stable and less sensitive to adversarial perturbations, as well as to improve the transparency and interpretability of the models' decision-making processes.

This research is important for ensuring the security and reliability of GNNs, which have many real-world applications, such as in Graph Neural Network Explanations Are Fragile and Problem Space Structural Adversarial Attacks on Network Intrusion Detection. By understanding the vulnerabilities of these models and developing effective defenses, researchers can help ensure that GNNs can be safely and reliably deployed in a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Explainable AI Security: Exploring Robustness of Graph Neural Networks to Adversarial Attacks
Total Score

0

Explainable AI Security: Exploring Robustness of Graph Neural Networks to Adversarial Attacks

Tao Wu, Canyixing Cui, Xingping Xian, Shaojie Qiao, Chao Wang, Lin Yuan, Shui Yu

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved tremendous success, but recent studies have shown that GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which significantly hinders their use in safety-critical scenarios. Therefore, the design of robust GNNs has attracted increasing attention. However, existing research has mainly been conducted via experimental trial and error, and thus far, there remains a lack of a comprehensive understanding of the vulnerability of GNNs. To address this limitation, we systematically investigate the adversarial robustness of GNNs by considering graph data patterns, model-specific factors, and the transferability of adversarial examples. Through extensive experiments, a set of principled guidelines is obtained for improving the adversarial robustness of GNNs, for example: (i) rather than highly regular graphs, the training graph data with diverse structural patterns is crucial for model robustness, which is consistent with the concept of adversarial training; (ii) the large model capacity of GNNs with sufficient training data has a positive effect on model robustness, and only a small percentage of neurons in GNNs are affected by adversarial attacks; (iii) adversarial transfer is not symmetric and the adversarial examples produced by the small-capacity model have stronger adversarial transferability. This work illuminates the vulnerabilities of GNNs and opens many promising avenues for designing robust GNNs.

Read more

6/21/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Expressivity of Graph Neural Networks Through the Lens of Adversarial Robustness

Francesco Campi, Lukas Gosch, Tom Wollschlager, Yan Scholten, Stephan Gunnemann

We perform the first adversarial robustness study into Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that are provably more powerful than traditional Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs). In particular, we use adversarial robustness as a tool to uncover a significant gap between their theoretically possible and empirically achieved expressive power. To do so, we focus on the ability of GNNs to count specific subgraph patterns, which is an established measure of expressivity, and extend the concept of adversarial robustness to this task. Based on this, we develop efficient adversarial attacks for subgraph counting and show that more powerful GNNs fail to generalize even to small perturbations to the graph's structure. Expanding on this, we show that such architectures also fail to count substructures on out-of-distribution graphs.

Read more

7/4/2024

Graph Neural Network Explanations are Fragile
Total Score

0

Graph Neural Network Explanations are Fragile

Jiate Li, Meng Pang, Yun Dong, Jinyuan Jia, Binghui Wang

Explainable Graph Neural Network (GNN) has emerged recently to foster the trust of using GNNs. Existing GNN explainers are developed from various perspectives to enhance the explanation performance. We take the first step to study GNN explainers under adversarial attack--We found that an adversary slightly perturbing graph structure can ensure GNN model makes correct predictions, but the GNN explainer yields a drastically different explanation on the perturbed graph. Specifically, we first formulate the attack problem under a practical threat model (i.e., the adversary has limited knowledge about the GNN explainer and a restricted perturbation budget). We then design two methods (i.e., one is loss-based and the other is deduction-based) to realize the attack. We evaluate our attacks on various GNN explainers and the results show these explainers are fragile.

Read more

6/6/2024

Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire
Total Score

0

Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire

Zhong Li, Simon Geisler, Yuhang Wang, Stephan Gunnemann, Matthijs van Leeuwen

Predictions made by graph neural networks (GNNs) usually lack interpretability due to their complex computational behavior and the abstract nature of graphs. In an attempt to tackle this, many GNN explanation methods have emerged. Their goal is to explain a model's predictions and thereby obtain trust when GNN models are deployed in decision critical applications. Most GNN explanation methods work in a post-hoc manner and provide explanations in the form of a small subset of important edges and/or nodes. In this paper we demonstrate that these explanations can unfortunately not be trusted, as common GNN explanation methods turn out to be highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations. That is, even small perturbations of the original graph structure that preserve the model's predictions may yield drastically different explanations. This calls into question the trustworthiness and practical utility of post-hoc explanation methods for GNNs. To be able to attack GNN explanation models, we devise a novel attack method dubbed textit{GXAttack}, the first textit{optimization-based} adversarial attack method for post-hoc GNN explanations under such settings. Due to the devastating effectiveness of our attack, we call for an adversarial evaluation of future GNN explainers to demonstrate their robustness.

Read more

6/11/2024