Robustness of Decentralised Learning to Nodes and Data Disruption
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the robustness of decentralized machine learning to disruptions in nodes and data.
- It explores how decentralized learning systems can maintain performance and stability when faced with partial failures or corruptions of the underlying network or training data.
- The research aims to understand the resilience of decentralized learning approaches compared to centralized alternatives.
Plain English Explanation
Decentralized machine learning is an approach where multiple devices or "nodes" work together to train a shared model, without relying on a central server. This can be more efficient and private than traditional centralized machine learning.
However, decentralized systems may be more vulnerable to disruptions, such as individual nodes failing or having their training data corrupted. This paper looks at how well decentralized learning methods can withstand these types of problems, and how they compare to more centralized approaches.
The key idea is that decentralized learning, if designed properly, can actually be more robust to certain types of failures or corruptions than a centralized system. By distributing the work across many nodes, the impact of any single point of failure is reduced.
The paper explores different decentralized learning algorithms and evaluates their performance under various disruption scenarios. The findings suggest that with the right techniques, decentralized learning can maintain high accuracy and stability, even when faced with nodes dropping out or training data being corrupted.
This is an important result, as it demonstrates the potential for decentralized machine learning to be a reliable and practical alternative to centralized approaches, especially in applications where robustness and resilience are critical.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for analyzing the robustness of decentralized learning algorithms to disruptions in both the network of nodes and the training data. They consider two key disruption scenarios:
- Node Failures: Where a subset of nodes participating in the decentralized training process become unavailable or stop contributing.
- Data Corruptions: Where the training data on some nodes is corrupted or adversarially manipulated.
The authors develop theoretical models to characterize the convergence and stability properties of various decentralized learning algorithms, such as scale-robust timely asynchronous decentralized learning, beyond noise privacy-preserving decentralized learning, robust decentralized learning with local updates and gradient tracking, and privacy-preserving dropout-resilient aggregation for decentralized learning, under these disruption scenarios.
Through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation, the paper demonstrates that certain decentralized learning approaches can outperform centralized training in terms of robustness to node failures and data corruptions. The key insights include:
- Decentralized learning can be more resilient to node failures by distributing the workload and mitigating the impact of individual node dropouts.
- Decentralized algorithms that leverage techniques like gradient tracking and robust aggregation can be particularly effective at maintaining performance in the face of data corruptions.
- There are trade-offs between robustness, communication efficiency, and other desirable properties that must be carefully balanced when designing decentralized learning systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous and comprehensive analysis of the robustness of decentralized learning, addressing important practical concerns around the reliability and stability of these distributed systems.
One potential limitation is that the disruption scenarios considered, while realistic, may not capture the full range of challenges that decentralized learning systems may face in real-world deployments. For example, the paper does not explore the impact of more complex network topologies, dynamic node participation, or adversarial attacks targeting the decentralized learning process itself.
Additionally, the theoretical analysis relies on certain simplifying assumptions, such as convex objective functions and bounded noise, which may not always hold in practice. Further research is needed to understand the robustness of decentralized learning in more general and realistic settings.
Another area for further investigation is the interaction between robustness and other desirable properties, such as communication efficiency, privacy, and convergence rate. The paper touches on these trade-offs, but a more comprehensive exploration could help guide the design of practical decentralized learning systems that can balance multiple objectives.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of decentralized machine learning by demonstrating that, with the right algorithmic techniques, these distributed systems can be more robust to disruptions in nodes and training data compared to centralized approaches.
The findings suggest that decentralized learning has the potential to be a reliable and practical alternative to traditional centralized machine learning, especially in applications where resilience and fault-tolerance are critical. By distributing the learning process across multiple nodes, the impact of individual failures or data corruptions can be mitigated, leading to more stable and consistent performance.
The theoretical analysis and empirical results provide a solid foundation for further research and development in the area of robust and resilient decentralized learning algorithms. As the field of distributed AI continues to evolve, this work highlights the importance of addressing practical considerations around reliability and stability to enable the widespread adoption of decentralized machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Robustness of Decentralised Learning to Nodes and Data Disruption
Luigi Palmieri, Chiara Boldrini, Lorenzo Valerio, Andrea Passarella, Marco Conti, J'anos Kert'esz
In the vibrant landscape of AI research, decentralised learning is gaining momentum. Decentralised learning allows individual nodes to keep data locally where they are generated and to share knowledge extracted from local data among themselves through an interactive process of collaborative refinement. This paradigm supports scenarios where data cannot leave local nodes due to privacy or sovereignty reasons or real-time constraints imposing proximity of models to locations where inference has to be carried out. The distributed nature of decentralised learning implies significant new research challenges with respect to centralised learning. Among them, in this paper, we focus on robustness issues. Specifically, we study the effect of nodes' disruption on the collective learning process. Assuming a given percentage of central nodes disappear from the network, we focus on different cases, characterised by (i) different distributions of data across nodes and (ii) different times when disruption occurs with respect to the start of the collaborative learning task. Through these configurations, we are able to show the non-trivial interplay between the properties of the network connecting nodes, the persistence of knowledge acquired collectively before disruption or lack thereof, and the effect of data availability pre- and post-disruption. Our results show that decentralised learning processes are remarkably robust to network disruption. As long as even minimum amounts of data remain available somewhere in the network, the learning process is able to recover from disruptions and achieve significant classification accuracy. This clearly varies depending on the remaining connectivity after disruption, but we show that even nodes that remain completely isolated can retain significant knowledge acquired before the disruption.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Initialisation and Topology Effects in Decentralised Federated Learning
Arash Badie-Modiri, Chiara Boldrini, Lorenzo Valerio, J'anos Kert'esz, M'arton Karsai
Fully decentralised federated learning enables collaborative training of individual machine learning models on distributed devices on a communication network while keeping the training data localised. This approach enhances data privacy and eliminates both the single point of failure and the necessity for central coordination. Our research highlights that the effectiveness of decentralised federated learning is significantly influenced by the network topology of connected devices. We propose a strategy for uncoordinated initialisation of the artificial neural networks, which leverages the distribution of eigenvector centralities of the nodes of the underlying communication network, leading to a radically improved training efficiency. Additionally, our study explores the scaling behaviour and choice of environmental parameters under our proposed initialisation strategy. This work paves the way for more efficient and scalable artificial neural network training in a distributed and uncoordinated environment, offering a deeper understanding of the intertwining roles of network structure and learning dynamics.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Impact of Network Topology on Byzantine Resilience in Decentralized Federated Learning
Siddhartha Bhattacharya, Daniel Helo, Joshua Siegel
Federated learning (FL) enables a collaborative environment for training machine learning models without sharing training data between users. This is typically achieved by aggregating model gradients on a central server. Decentralized federated learning is a rising paradigm that enables users to collaboratively train machine learning models in a peer-to-peer manner, without the need for a central aggregation server. However, before applying decentralized FL in real-world use training environments, nodes that deviate from the FL process (Byzantine nodes) must be considered when selecting an aggregation function. Recent research has focused on Byzantine-robust aggregation for client-server or fully connected networks, but has not yet evaluated such aggregation schemes for complex topologies possible with decentralized FL. Thus, the need for empirical evidence of Byzantine robustness in differing network topologies is evident. This work investigates the effects of state-of-the-art Byzantine-robust aggregation methods in complex, large-scale network structures. We find that state-of-the-art Byzantine robust aggregation strategies are not resilient within large non-fully connected networks. As such, our findings point the field towards the development of topology-aware aggregation schemes, especially necessary within the context of large scale real-world deployment.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Scale-Robust Timely Asynchronous Decentralized Learning
Purbesh Mitra, Sennur Ulukus
We consider an asynchronous decentralized learning system, which consists of a network of connected devices trying to learn a machine learning model without any centralized parameter server. The users in the network have their own local training data, which is used for learning across all the nodes in the network. The learning method consists of two processes, evolving simultaneously without any necessary synchronization. The first process is the model update, where the users update their local model via a fixed number of stochastic gradient descent steps. The second process is model mixing, where the users communicate with each other via randomized gossiping to exchange their models and average them to reach consensus. In this work, we investigate the staleness criteria for such a system, which is a sufficient condition for convergence of individual user models. We show that for network scaling, i.e., when the number of user devices $n$ is very large, if the gossip capacity of individual users scales as $Omega(log n)$, we can guarantee the convergence of user models in finite time. Furthermore, we show that the bounded staleness can only be guaranteed by any distributed opportunistic scheme by $Omega(n)$ scaling.
Read more5/1/2024