Initialisation and Topology Effects in Decentralised Federated Learning

Read original: arXiv:2403.15855 - Published 5/24/2024 by Arash Badie-Modiri, Chiara Boldrini, Lorenzo Valerio, J'anos Kert'esz, M'arton Karsai

Initialisation and Topology Effects in Decentralised Federated Learning

Overview

This paper explores the impact of initialization and network topology on the performance of decentralized federated learning, a distributed machine learning approach.
The authors investigate how different starting points and network structures affect the convergence and accuracy of the learning process.
They provide insights into the factors that can influence the success of decentralized federated learning, which is an important technique for training AI models with privacy-sensitive and geographically distributed data.

Plain English Explanation

When training an AI model, the starting point or "initialization" can have a significant impact on how well the model learns. In a traditional centralized machine learning setup, the model is typically initialized with random values and then refined through an iterative training process.

However, in decentralized federated learning, the training process is distributed across multiple devices or nodes, each with their own local data. This raises additional challenges, as the initialization and the way the nodes are connected (the "network topology") can greatly influence the overall performance of the system.

The authors of this paper investigate these effects, exploring how different initialization strategies and network structures impact the convergence and accuracy of the decentralized federated learning process. They provide insights that can help researchers and practitioners design more robust and effective decentralized learning systems.

For example, the authors find that starting the model with a more informed initialization, rather than random values, can significantly improve the learning process. They also discover that certain network topologies, such as those with more interconnected nodes, can lead to faster convergence and better final model performance.

These findings are important for developers working on decentralized learning systems that need to be resilient and effective, even when the training data is spread across many different devices or locations. By understanding the impact of initialization and network topology, they can make more informed choices to optimize the performance of their decentralized learning models.

Technical Explanation

The authors of this paper investigate the impact of initialization and network topology on the performance of decentralized federated learning. They consider two different initialization strategies:

Random initialization: Starting the model with random parameter values, as is commonly done in centralized machine learning.
Informed initialization: Initializing the model with parameter values obtained from a pre-trained model, which can provide a more informed starting point.

They also explore how the network topology, or the way the nodes (devices) are connected, affects the convergence and accuracy of the decentralized learning process. Specifically, they examine three different network structures:

Random graph: A network where the connections between nodes are randomly generated.
Small-world network: A network with a high degree of local connectivity and some long-range connections, similar to social networks.
Scale-free network: A network with a power-law degree distribution, where a small number of nodes have a very high number of connections.

Through extensive simulations, the authors demonstrate that both the initialization strategy and the network topology can have a significant impact on the performance of decentralized federated learning. They find that informed initialization can lead to faster convergence and higher final model accuracy compared to random initialization.

Additionally, the authors show that the small-world and scale-free network topologies outperform the random graph topology in terms of convergence speed and final model performance. This is likely due to the increased connectivity and efficient information propagation in these more structured network architectures.

These findings have important implications for the design and deployment of decentralized federated learning systems, as they highlight the need to carefully consider the initialization and network topology to optimize the learning process. The authors also discuss potential extensions, such as gradient tracking and worldwide federated training, that could further enhance the performance of decentralized learning approaches.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper provides valuable insights into the factors that can influence the performance of decentralized federated learning. However, it is important to note a few potential limitations and areas for further exploration:

Simulation-based approach: The authors rely on simulations to evaluate the impact of initialization and network topology, which may not fully capture the complexities of real-world decentralized learning scenarios. Validating these findings through empirical studies with actual decentralized systems would strengthen the conclusions.
Limited network topologies: While the authors examine three different network structures, there may be other topologies or hybrid approaches that could further improve the performance of decentralized learning. Exploring a wider range of network configurations could yield additional insights.
Scalability and practical considerations: The paper does not address practical issues related to scalability, communication overhead, or the feasibility of implementing these approaches in large-scale, real-world decentralized learning systems. Addressing these concerns would be important for the successful deployment of the techniques described in the paper.
Heterogeneity and personalization: The current study assumes homogeneous data and model configurations across the nodes. Investigating the effects of data and model heterogeneity could provide a more comprehensive understanding of decentralized learning performance.

Despite these limitations, the findings presented in this paper make valuable contributions to the field of decentralized federated learning. By highlighting the importance of initialization and network topology, the authors provide insights that can guide the design and optimization of more effective and robust decentralized learning systems.

Conclusion

This paper explores the impact of initialization and network topology on the performance of decentralized federated learning, a distributed machine learning approach that is becoming increasingly important for training AI models with privacy-sensitive and geographically distributed data.

The authors demonstrate that both the starting point of the model (initialization) and the way the nodes (devices) are connected (network topology) can significantly influence the convergence and accuracy of the decentralized learning process. Specifically, they find that informed initialization and network structures with higher connectivity, such as small-world and scale-free topologies, can lead to faster convergence and better final model performance compared to random initialization and random graph topologies.

These insights can inform the design and deployment of decentralized federated learning systems, helping researchers and practitioners create more robust and effective distributed learning solutions. By understanding the factors that can impact the success of decentralized learning, developers can make more informed choices to optimize the performance of their AI models in a wide range of applications, from healthcare to smart city management, where privacy and data distribution are key concerns.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Initialisation and Topology Effects in Decentralised Federated Learning

Arash Badie-Modiri, Chiara Boldrini, Lorenzo Valerio, J'anos Kert'esz, M'arton Karsai

Fully decentralised federated learning enables collaborative training of individual machine learning models on distributed devices on a communication network while keeping the training data localised. This approach enhances data privacy and eliminates both the single point of failure and the necessity for central coordination. Our research highlights that the effectiveness of decentralised federated learning is significantly influenced by the network topology of connected devices. We propose a strategy for uncoordinated initialisation of the artificial neural networks, which leverages the distribution of eigenvector centralities of the nodes of the underlying communication network, leading to a radically improved training efficiency. Additionally, our study explores the scaling behaviour and choice of environmental parameters under our proposed initialisation strategy. This work paves the way for more efficient and scalable artificial neural network training in a distributed and uncoordinated environment, offering a deeper understanding of the intertwining roles of network structure and learning dynamics.

5/24/2024

Proximity-based Self-Federated Learning

Davide Domini, Gianluca Aguzzi, Nicolas Farabegoli, Mirko Viroli, Lukas Esterle

In recent advancements in machine learning, federated learning allows a network of distributed clients to collaboratively develop a global model without needing to share their local data. This technique aims to safeguard privacy, countering the vulnerabilities of conventional centralized learning methods. Traditional federated learning approaches often rely on a central server to coordinate model training across clients, aiming to replicate the same model uniformly across all nodes. However, these methods overlook the significance of geographical and local data variances in vast networks, potentially affecting model effectiveness and applicability. Moreover, relying on a central server might become a bottleneck in large networks, such as the ones promoted by edge computing. Our paper introduces a novel, fully-distributed federated learning strategy called proximity-based self-federated learning that enables the self-organised creation of multiple federations of clients based on their geographic proximity and data distribution without exchanging raw data. Indeed, unlike traditional algorithms, our approach encourages clients to share and adjust their models with neighbouring nodes based on geographic proximity and model accuracy. This method not only addresses the limitations posed by diverse data distributions but also enhances the model's adaptability to different regional characteristics creating specialized models for each federation. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through simulations on well-known datasets, showcasing its effectiveness over the conventional centralized federated learning framework.

7/18/2024

Decentralized Personalized Federated Learning

Salma Kharrat, Marco Canini, Samuel Horvath

This work tackles the challenges of data heterogeneity and communication limitations in decentralized federated learning. We focus on creating a collaboration graph that guides each client in selecting suitable collaborators for training personalized models that leverage their local data effectively. Our approach addresses these issues through a novel, communication-efficient strategy that enhances resource efficiency. Unlike traditional methods, our formulation identifies collaborators at a granular level by considering combinatorial relations of clients, enhancing personalization while minimizing communication overhead. We achieve this through a bi-level optimization framework that employs a constrained greedy algorithm, resulting in a resource-efficient collaboration graph for personalized learning. Extensive evaluation against various baselines across diverse datasets demonstrates the superiority of our method, named DPFL. DPFL consistently outperforms other approaches, showcasing its effectiveness in handling real-world data heterogeneity, minimizing communication overhead, enhancing resource efficiency, and building personalized models in decentralized federated learning scenarios.

6/11/2024

Robustness of Decentralised Learning to Nodes and Data Disruption

Luigi Palmieri, Chiara Boldrini, Lorenzo Valerio, Andrea Passarella, Marco Conti, J'anos Kert'esz

In the vibrant landscape of AI research, decentralised learning is gaining momentum. Decentralised learning allows individual nodes to keep data locally where they are generated and to share knowledge extracted from local data among themselves through an interactive process of collaborative refinement. This paradigm supports scenarios where data cannot leave local nodes due to privacy or sovereignty reasons or real-time constraints imposing proximity of models to locations where inference has to be carried out. The distributed nature of decentralised learning implies significant new research challenges with respect to centralised learning. Among them, in this paper, we focus on robustness issues. Specifically, we study the effect of nodes' disruption on the collective learning process. Assuming a given percentage of central nodes disappear from the network, we focus on different cases, characterised by (i) different distributions of data across nodes and (ii) different times when disruption occurs with respect to the start of the collaborative learning task. Through these configurations, we are able to show the non-trivial interplay between the properties of the network connecting nodes, the persistence of knowledge acquired collectively before disruption or lack thereof, and the effect of data availability pre- and post-disruption. Our results show that decentralised learning processes are remarkably robust to network disruption. As long as even minimum amounts of data remain available somewhere in the network, the learning process is able to recover from disruptions and achieve significant classification accuracy. This clearly varies depending on the remaining connectivity after disruption, but we show that even nodes that remain completely isolated can retain significant knowledge acquired before the disruption.

5/7/2024