Robustness and Exploration of Variational and Machine Learning Approaches to Inverse Problems: An Overview

Read original: arXiv:2402.12072 - Published 7/10/2024 by Alexander Auras, Kanchana Vaishnavi Gandikota, Hannah Droege, Michael Moeller
Total Score

0

🚀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses current approaches for solving inverse problems in imaging using variational methods and machine learning.
  • It focuses on point estimators and their robustness against adversarial perturbations, with a one-dimensional toy problem experiment to demonstrate this.
  • The paper also explores the subspace of data-consistent solutions and how to explicitly guide them to satisfy specific semantic or textural properties.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines different techniques for solving "inverse problems" in imaging. Inverse problems are when you try to reconstruct or estimate an original image from incomplete or distorted data.

The researchers focus on a specific type of image reconstruction called "point estimators." These are methods that try to find a single, best estimate of the original image. The paper looks at how robust these point estimators are to "adversarial perturbations" - small, carefully crafted changes to the input data that can trick the reconstruction algorithm.

To test this, the researchers ran experiments on a simplified, one-dimensional imaging problem. The results showed that some point estimator approaches are more robust to these adversarial attacks than others, backing up the theoretical guarantees discussed in the paper.

Another key focus is on exploring the "subspace" of solutions that are consistent with the observed data. The paper looks at ways to explicitly guide the reconstruction to solutions that have desirable "semantic" or "textural" properties.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides an overview of variational methods and machine learning approaches for solving inverse problems in imaging. It focuses in particular on point estimators - techniques that aim to find a single, optimal estimate of the original image from the observed, distorted data.

To analyze the robustness of these point estimators, the researchers designed a one-dimensional toy problem experiment. They generated synthetic data, applied distortions, and then tried to reconstruct the original signal using different point estimator methods. The results showed that some approaches, like those based on "variational inference", were more resilient to "adversarial perturbations" of the input data compared to others.

The paper also explores techniques for guiding the reconstruction process to find solutions that lie within the "subspace" of data-consistent images. By explicitly incorporating "semantic" or "textural" constraints, the researchers demonstrate how the reconstruction can be tailored to produce more desirable results.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of current approaches for solving inverse problems in imaging, with a focus on the robustness and guided reconstruction of point estimators. The one-dimensional toy problem experiment offers a useful proof-of-concept, but it remains to be seen how well the findings translate to more complex, real-world imaging scenarios.

While the paper discusses the theoretical guarantees of certain variational inference techniques, it would be helpful to see a more thorough analysis of the practical tradeoffs between different point estimator methods in terms of computational efficiency, ease of implementation, and overall reconstruction quality.

Additionally, the exploration of data-consistent subspaces and semantic/textural guidance is an interesting direction, but the paper could benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the potential limitations and challenges in scaling these techniques to higher-dimensional problems.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of inverse problems in imaging, but further research and validation on more realistic datasets would be helpful to fully assess the practical implications and generalizability of the proposed approaches.

Conclusion

This paper provides a detailed overview of current methods for solving inverse problems in imaging using variational techniques and machine learning. It focuses on the robustness of point estimators, demonstrating their performance on a simplified one-dimensional problem, and explores ways to guide the reconstruction process to find data-consistent solutions with desirable semantic and textural properties.

The findings offer important insights for researchers and practitioners working on image reconstruction and restoration tasks, particularly in terms of ensuring the reliability and controllability of the reconstruction process. While the paper provides a solid theoretical foundation, further research is needed to evaluate the scalability and real-world applicability of the proposed approaches.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🚀

Total Score

0

Robustness and Exploration of Variational and Machine Learning Approaches to Inverse Problems: An Overview

Alexander Auras, Kanchana Vaishnavi Gandikota, Hannah Droege, Michael Moeller

This paper provides an overview of current approaches for solving inverse problems in imaging using variational methods and machine learning. A special focus lies on point estimators and their robustness against adversarial perturbations. In this context results of numerical experiments for a one-dimensional toy problem are provided, showing the robustness of different approaches and empirically verifying theoretical guarantees. Another focus of this review is the exploration of the subspace of data-consistent solutions through explicit guidance to satisfy specific semantic or textural properties.

Read more

7/10/2024

A Guide to Stochastic Optimisation for Large-Scale Inverse Problems
Total Score

0

A Guide to Stochastic Optimisation for Large-Scale Inverse Problems

Matthias J. Ehrhardt, Zeljko Kereta, Jingwei Liang, Junqi Tang

Stochastic optimisation algorithms are the de facto standard for machine learning with large amounts of data. Handling only a subset of available data in each optimisation step dramatically reduces the per-iteration computational costs, while still ensuring significant progress towards the solution. Driven by the need to solve large-scale optimisation problems as efficiently as possible, the last decade has witnessed an explosion of research in this area. Leveraging the parallels between machine learning and inverse problems has allowed harnessing the power of this research wave for solving inverse problems. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive account of the state-of-the-art in stochastic optimisation from the viewpoint of inverse problems. We present algorithms with diverse modalities of problem randomisation and discuss the roles of variance reduction, acceleration, higher-order methods, and other algorithmic modifications, and compare theoretical results with practical behaviour. We focus on the potential and the challenges for stochastic optimisation that are unique to inverse imaging problems and are not commonly encountered in machine learning. We conclude the survey with illustrative examples from imaging problems to examine the advantages and disadvantages that this new generation of algorithms bring to the field of inverse problems.

Read more

7/10/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

A Primer on Variational Inference for Physics-Informed Deep Generative Modelling

Alex Glyn-Davies, Arnaud Vadeboncoeur, O. Deniz Akyildiz, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Mark Girolami

Variational inference (VI) is a computationally efficient and scalable methodology for approximate Bayesian inference. It strikes a balance between accuracy of uncertainty quantification and practical tractability. It excels at generative modelling and inversion tasks due to its built-in Bayesian regularisation and flexibility, essential qualities for physics related problems. Deriving the central learning objective for VI must often be tailored to new learning tasks where the nature of the problems dictates the conditional dependence between variables of interest, such as arising in physics problems. In this paper, we provide an accessible and thorough technical introduction to VI for forward and inverse problems, guiding the reader through standard derivations of the VI framework and how it can best be realized through deep learning. We then review and unify recent literature exemplifying the creative flexibility allowed by VI. This paper is designed for a general scientific audience looking to solve physics-based problems with an emphasis on uncertainty quantification.

Read more

9/11/2024

Learned Regularization for Inverse Problems: Insights from a Spectral Model
Total Score

0

Learned Regularization for Inverse Problems: Insights from a Spectral Model

Martin Burger, Samira Kabri

In this chapter we provide a theoretically founded investigation of state-of-the-art learning approaches for inverse problems from the point of view of spectral reconstruction operators. We give an extended definition of regularization methods and their convergence in terms of the underlying data distributions, which paves the way for future theoretical studies. Based on a simple spectral learning model previously introduced for supervised learning, we investigate some key properties of different learning paradigms for inverse problems, which can be formulated independently of specific architectures. In particular we investigate the regularization properties, bias, and critical dependence on training data distributions. Moreover, our framework allows to highlight and compare the specific behavior of the different paradigms in the infinite-dimensional limit.

Read more

6/5/2024