The troublesome kernel -- On hallucinations, no free lunches and the accuracy-stability trade-off in inverse problems

Read original: arXiv:2001.01258 - Published 6/21/2024 by Nina M. Gottschling, Vegard Antun, Anders C. Hansen, Ben Adcock

🔗

Overview

This paper provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the reliability and trustworthiness issues that can arise with AI-based methods for solving inverse problems in imaging.
The key issues explored are hallucinations, instability, and unpredictable generalization of these methods.
The paper presents mathematical explanations for how and when such effects can occur, including several "no free lunch" theorems.

Plain English Explanation

AI-based methods are revolutionizing computational science and engineering by achieving breakthrough performances on challenging problems. However, the reliability and trustworthiness of these techniques is a major concern, especially in the domain of inverse problems in imaging.

Inverse problems involve reconstructing an image or other information from indirect measurements. There is growing evidence that AI-based methods for these problems can suffer from several issues:

Hallucinations: The method may generate false but realistic-looking artifacts in the reconstructed image.
Instability: The method is highly sensitive to small changes in the input data, leading to significantly different outputs.
Unpredictable generalization: The method may perform excellently on some images but deteriorate significantly on others.

This paper aims to provide a theoretical understanding of these phenomena. It presents mathematical explanations for how and when these issues can arise, even in arbitrary reconstruction methods. The key insights include:

Methods that overperform on a single image can wrongly transfer details from one image to another, creating hallucinations.
Methods that overperform on multiple images can either hallucinate or be unstable.
Optimizing the balance between accuracy and stability is generally difficult.
Hallucinations and instabilities, if they occur, are not rare events and may be encouraged by standard training practices.
For certain inverse problems, it may be impossible to construct optimal reconstruction methods.

These insights trace these effects to the underlying mathematical structure of the inverse problem, specifically the kernel of the forward operator. The paper's goal is to spur research into developing more robust and reliable AI-based methods for inverse problems in imaging.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a theoretical analysis of the reliability and trustworthiness of AI-based methods for solving inverse problems in imaging. Inverse problems involve reconstructing an image or other information from indirect measurements, such as medical imaging or seismic exploration.

The key issues explored are hallucinations, where the method generates false but realistic-looking artifacts; instability, where the method is highly sensitive to small changes in the input data; and unpredictable generalization, where the method performs excellently on some images but deteriorates significantly on others.

The paper presents several mathematical theorems that explain how and when these effects can arise, even in arbitrary reconstruction methods. The key insights include:

Methods that overperform on a single image can wrongly transfer details from one image to another, creating hallucinations.
Methods that overperform on two or more images can either hallucinate or be unstable.
Optimizing the balance between accuracy and stability is generally difficult.
Hallucinations and instabilities, if they occur, are not rare events and may be encouraged by standard training practices.
For certain inverse problems, it may be impossible to construct optimal reconstruction methods.

These results are traced to the underlying mathematical structure of the inverse problem, specifically the kernel of the forward operator. The paper also discusses the case where the forward operator is ill-conditioned, which can further exacerbate these issues.

The paper's goal is to spur research into developing more robust and reliable AI-based methods for inverse problems in imaging, such as inverse cubature or methods for estimating hallucination rates.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive theoretical foundation for understanding the reliability and trustworthiness issues that can arise with AI-based methods for inverse problems in imaging. The insights presented, including the various "no free lunch" theorems, are valuable for guiding the development of more robust and reliable techniques.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on the theoretical aspects and does not provide extensive empirical validation of the proposed explanations. While the mathematical analysis is rigorous, it would be beneficial to see more concrete examples or case studies demonstrating the practical implications of the identified issues.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into potential solutions or mitigation strategies for the hallucinations, instability, and unpredictable generalization problems. While the authors mention the need for further research in this direction, a more detailed discussion of promising approaches or future research directions could have enhanced the impact of the work.

Nevertheless, the paper's contribution to the fundamental understanding of these reliability challenges is significant. It encourages researchers to think critically about the limitations of current AI-based methods and to develop new techniques that can address the identified issues. Ultimately, this work can help drive the field towards more trustworthy and reliable AI-powered solutions for inverse problems in imaging and beyond.

Conclusion

This paper provides a rigorous theoretical foundation for understanding the reliability and trustworthiness issues that can arise when using AI-based methods to solve inverse problems in imaging. The key insights include explanations for hallucinations, instability, and unpredictable generalization, which are often observed in these techniques.

The paper's mathematical analysis, including several "no free lunch" theorems, trace these effects to the underlying structure of the inverse problem, specifically the kernel of the forward operator. These findings highlight the importance of developing a deeper understanding of the theoretical properties of AI-based methods, rather than relying solely on their empirical performance.

The insights presented in this work can spur research into new approaches for building more robust and reliable AI-powered solutions for inverse problems in imaging and other computational domains. By addressing the identified limitations, the field can move closer to realizing the transformative potential of AI while ensuring the trustworthiness and reliability of these powerful techniques.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔗

The troublesome kernel -- On hallucinations, no free lunches and the accuracy-stability trade-off in inverse problems

Nina M. Gottschling, Vegard Antun, Anders C. Hansen, Ben Adcock

Methods inspired by Artificial Intelligence (AI) are starting to fundamentally change computational science and engineering through breakthrough performances on challenging problems. However, reliability and trustworthiness of such techniques is a major concern. In inverse problems in imaging, the focus of this paper, there is increasing empirical evidence that methods may suffer from hallucinations, i.e., false, but realistic-looking artifacts; instability, i.e., sensitivity to perturbations in the data; and unpredictable generalization, i.e., excellent performance on some images, but significant deterioration on others. This paper provides a theoretical foundation for these phenomena. We give mathematical explanations for how and when such effects arise in arbitrary reconstruction methods, with several of our results taking the form of `no free lunch' theorems. Specifically, we show that (i) methods that overperform on a single image can wrongly transfer details from one image to another, creating a hallucination, (ii) methods that overperform on two or more images can hallucinate or be unstable, (iii) optimizing the accuracy-stability trade-off is generally difficult, (iv) hallucinations and instabilities, if they occur, are not rare events, and may be encouraged by standard training, (v) it may be impossible to construct optimal reconstruction maps for certain problems. Our results trace these effects to the kernel of the forward operator whenever it is nontrivial, but also apply to the case when the forward operator is ill-conditioned. Based on these insights, our work aims to spur research into new ways to develop robust and reliable AI-based methods for inverse problems in imaging.

6/21/2024

Looks Too Good To Be True: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Hallucinations in Generative Restoration Models

Regev Cohen, Idan Kligvasser, Ehud Rivlin, Daniel Freedman

The pursuit of high perceptual quality in image restoration has driven the development of revolutionary generative models, capable of producing results often visually indistinguishable from real data. However, as their perceptual quality continues to improve, these models also exhibit a growing tendency to generate hallucinations - realistic-looking details that do not exist in the ground truth images. The presence of hallucinations introduces uncertainty regarding the reliability of the models' predictions, raising major concerns about their practical application. In this paper, we employ information-theory tools to investigate this phenomenon, revealing a fundamental tradeoff between uncertainty and perception. We rigorously analyze the relationship between these two factors, proving that the global minimal uncertainty in generative models grows in tandem with perception. In particular, we define the inherent uncertainty of the restoration problem and show that attaining perfect perceptual quality entails at least twice this uncertainty. Additionally, we establish a relation between mean squared-error distortion, uncertainty and perception, through which we prove the aforementioned uncertainly-perception tradeoff induces the well-known perception-distortion tradeoff. This work uncovers fundamental limitations of generative models in achieving both high perceptual quality and reliable predictions for image restoration. We demonstrate our theoretical findings through an analysis of single image super-resolution algorithms. Our work aims to raise awareness among practitioners about this inherent tradeoff, empowering them to make informed decisions and potentially prioritize safety over perceptual performance.

6/5/2024

💬

Towards Reliable Medical Question Answering: Techniques and Challenges in Mitigating Hallucinations in Language Models

Duy Khoa Pham, Bao Quoc Vo

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly impacted various domains, including healthcare and biomedicine. However, the phenomenon of hallucination, where LLMs generate outputs that deviate from factual accuracy or context, poses a critical challenge, especially in high-stakes domains. This paper conducts a scoping study of existing techniques for mitigating hallucinations in knowledge-based task in general and especially for medical domains. Key methods covered in the paper include Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based techniques, iterative feedback loops, supervised fine-tuning, and prompt engineering. These techniques, while promising in general contexts, require further adaptation and optimization for the medical domain due to its unique demands for up-to-date, specialized knowledge and strict adherence to medical guidelines. Addressing these challenges is crucial for developing trustworthy AI systems that enhance clinical decision-making and patient safety as well as accuracy of biomedical scientific research.

8/27/2024

🚀

Robustness and Exploration of Variational and Machine Learning Approaches to Inverse Problems: An Overview

Alexander Auras, Kanchana Vaishnavi Gandikota, Hannah Droege, Michael Moeller

This paper provides an overview of current approaches for solving inverse problems in imaging using variational methods and machine learning. A special focus lies on point estimators and their robustness against adversarial perturbations. In this context results of numerical experiments for a one-dimensional toy problem are provided, showing the robustness of different approaches and empirically verifying theoretical guarantees. Another focus of this review is the exploration of the subspace of data-consistent solutions through explicit guidance to satisfy specific semantic or textural properties.

7/10/2024