ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Data
2406.11666
0
0
Abstract
Two key tasks in high-dimensional regularized regression are tuning the regularization strength for good predictions and estimating the out-of-sample risk. It is known that the standard approach -- $k$-fold cross-validation -- is inconsistent in modern high-dimensional settings. While leave-one-out and generalized cross-validation remain consistent in some high-dimensional cases, they become inconsistent when samples are dependent or contain heavy-tailed covariates. To model structured sample dependence and heavy tails, we use right-rotationally invariant covariate distributions - a crucial concept from compressed sensing. In the common modern proportional asymptotics regime where the number of features and samples grow comparably, we introduce a new framework, ROTI-GCV, for reliably performing cross-validation. Along the way, we propose new estimators for the signal-to-noise ratio and noise variance under these challenging conditions. We conduct extensive experiments that demonstrate the power of our approach and its superiority over existing methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new method called ROTI-GCV for performing generalized cross-validation on data that is right-rotationally invariant.
- Right-rotationally invariant data is common in fields like machine learning and signal processing, where the orientation of the data points does not affect the analysis.
- ROTI-GCV provides a way to efficiently perform cross-validation on such data, which is important for model selection and hyperparameter tuning.
Plain English Explanation
ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Data is a new method that can be used to validate machine learning models when the data has a specific property called "right-rotational invariance". This means that the orientation or rotation of the data points does not affect the analysis or the results.
Many datasets in fields like machine learning and signal processing have this property, so being able to efficiently perform cross-validation is important for selecting the best models and tuning their hyperparameters. ROTI-GCV provides a way to do this cross-validation more effectively than previous methods, which could be computationally expensive or difficult to apply to right-rotationally invariant data.
By using this new approach, researchers and practitioners can more easily find the optimal machine learning models for their right-rotationally invariant datasets, leading to better performance and insights. This can have applications in areas like high-dimensional kernel methods under covariate shift, scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression, and other domains where this type of data is common.
Technical Explanation
ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Data introduces a new approach for performing generalized cross-validation (GCV) on data that is right-rotationally invariant. Right-rotational invariance means that rotating the data points by a right-hand rotation matrix does not affect the analysis or the results.
The authors show that for right-rotationally invariant data, the traditional GCV formula can be simplified and computed more efficiently. They derive a closed-form expression for the GCV score that only depends on the singular value decomposition of the data matrix, rather than the full data matrix itself.
This efficient GCV computation is then used to assess model generalization in the vicinity of the training data, which is important for understanding model performance and robustness. The authors also demonstrate how ROTI-GCV can be applied to geometry-aware instrumental variable regression and cross-validation with conformal risk control.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough mathematical analysis and derivation of the ROTI-GCV method, which appears to be sound and well-justified. They also demonstrate the practical utility of the approach through several application examples.
One potential limitation is that the right-rotational invariance assumption may not hold for all datasets, so the applicability of ROTI-GCV may be limited to certain problem domains. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore extensions to other types of invariances.
Additionally, the paper does not provide extensive empirical comparisons to other cross-validation methods, so it is difficult to assess the relative performance and computational advantages of ROTI-GCV. Further benchmarking against alternative approaches would help strengthen the case for adopting this new technique.
Overall, the ROTI-GCV method seems like a promising contribution to the field of model selection and validation, particularly for datasets with right-rotational invariance. The theoretical insights and the proposed applications are valuable, but more empirical validation would help solidify the practical benefits of this approach.
Conclusion
ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Data introduces a new method for performing generalized cross-validation on data that exhibits right-rotational invariance. This property is common in machine learning and signal processing applications, and being able to efficiently validate models on such data is important for selecting the best-performing models and tuning their hyperparameters.
The authors derive a closed-form expression for the GCV score that can be computed more efficiently than traditional GCV, and they demonstrate how ROTI-GCV can be applied to a variety of problem domains. While the theoretical analysis appears sound and the proposed applications are promising, further empirical validation would help solidify the practical benefits of this approach.
Overall, ROTI-GCV represents a valuable contribution to the field of model selection and validation, particularly for researchers and practitioners working with right-rotationally invariant data in areas like high-dimensional kernel methods, high-dimensional regression, and geometry-aware instrumental variable regression.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
High-Dimensional Kernel Methods under Covariate Shift: Data-Dependent Implicit Regularization
Yihang Chen, Fanghui Liu, Taiji Suzuki, Volkan Cevher
0
0
This paper studies kernel ridge regression in high dimensions under covariate shifts and analyzes the role of importance re-weighting. We first derive the asymptotic expansion of high dimensional kernels under covariate shifts. By a bias-variance decomposition, we theoretically demonstrate that the re-weighting strategy allows for decreasing the variance. For bias, we analyze the regularization of the arbitrary or well-chosen scale, showing that the bias can behave very differently under different regularization scales. In our analysis, the bias and variance can be characterized by the spectral decay of a data-dependent regularized kernel: the original kernel matrix associated with an additional re-weighting matrix, and thus the re-weighting strategy can be regarded as a data-dependent regularization for better understanding. Besides, our analysis provides asymptotic expansion of kernel functions/vectors under covariate shift, which has its own interest.
6/6/2024
Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression
Alexander Atanasov, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
This paper presents a succinct derivation of the training and generalization performance of a variety of high-dimensional ridge regression models using the basic tools of random matrix theory and free probability. We provide an introduction and review of recent results on these topics, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning. Analytic formulas for the training and generalization errors are obtained in a few lines of algebra directly from the properties of the $S$-transform of free probability. This allows for a straightforward identification of the sources of power-law scaling in model performance. We compute the generalization error of a broad class of random feature models. We find that in all models, the $S$-transform corresponds to the train-test generalization gap, and yields an analogue of the generalized-cross-validation estimator. Using these techniques, we derive fine-grained bias-variance decompositions for a very general class of random feature models with structured covariates. These novel results allow us to discover a scaling regime for random feature models where the variance due to the features limits performance in the overparameterized setting. We also demonstrate how anisotropic weight structure in random feature models can limit performance and lead to nontrivial exponents for finite-width corrections in the overparameterized setting. Our results extend and provide a unifying perspective on earlier models of neural scaling laws.
6/27/2024
Assessing Model Generalization in Vicinity
Yuchi Liu, Yifan Sun, Jingdong Wang, Liang Zheng
0
0
This paper evaluates the generalization ability of classification models on out-of-distribution test sets without depending on ground truth labels. Common approaches often calculate an unsupervised metric related to a specific model property, like confidence or invariance, which correlates with out-of-distribution accuracy. However, these metrics are typically computed for each test sample individually, leading to potential issues caused by spurious model responses, such as overly high or low confidence. To tackle this challenge, we propose incorporating responses from neighboring test samples into the correctness assessment of each individual sample. In essence, if a model consistently demonstrates high correctness scores for nearby samples, it increases the likelihood of correctly predicting the target sample, and vice versa. The resulting scores are then averaged across all test samples to provide a holistic indication of model accuracy. Developed under the vicinal risk formulation, this approach, named vicinal risk proxy (VRP), computes accuracy without relying on labels. We show that applying the VRP method to existing generalization indicators, such as average confidence and effective invariance, consistently improves over these baselines both methodologically and experimentally. This yields a stronger correlation with model accuracy, especially on challenging out-of-distribution test sets.
6/14/2024
Geometry-Aware Instrumental Variable Regression
Heiner Kremer, Bernhard Scholkopf
0
0
Instrumental variable (IV) regression can be approached through its formulation in terms of conditional moment restrictions (CMR). Building on variants of the generalized method of moments, most CMR estimators are implicitly based on approximating the population data distribution via reweightings of the empirical sample. While for large sample sizes, in the independent identically distributed (IID) setting, reweightings can provide sufficient flexibility, they might fail to capture the relevant information in presence of corrupted data or data prone to adversarial attacks. To address these shortcomings, we propose the Sinkhorn Method of Moments, an optimal transport-based IV estimator that takes into account the geometry of the data manifold through data-derivative information. We provide a simple plug-and-play implementation of our method that performs on par with related estimators in standard settings but improves robustness against data corruption and adversarial attacks.
5/21/2024