Geometry-Aware Instrumental Variable Regression
2405.11633
0
0
Abstract
Instrumental variable (IV) regression can be approached through its formulation in terms of conditional moment restrictions (CMR). Building on variants of the generalized method of moments, most CMR estimators are implicitly based on approximating the population data distribution via reweightings of the empirical sample. While for large sample sizes, in the independent identically distributed (IID) setting, reweightings can provide sufficient flexibility, they might fail to capture the relevant information in presence of corrupted data or data prone to adversarial attacks. To address these shortcomings, we propose the Sinkhorn Method of Moments, an optimal transport-based IV estimator that takes into account the geometry of the data manifold through data-derivative information. We provide a simple plug-and-play implementation of our method that performs on par with related estimators in standard settings but improves robustness against data corruption and adversarial attacks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach for instrumental variable regression that takes into account the underlying geometric structure of the problem.
- The authors develop a geometry-aware instrumental variable regression method that can better handle situations where the instrumental variables may not be fully valid or informative.
- The proposed method is evaluated on both synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating improved performance over conventional instrumental variable regression techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to perform instrumental variable regression, which is a statistical technique used to estimate the causal effect of one variable on another. Instrumental variable regression is useful when there are confounding factors that make it difficult to directly measure the relationship between the variables of interest.
The key idea behind the authors' approach is to incorporate the geometric properties of the problem into the regression model. This allows the method to better handle situations where the instrumental variables (the variables used to infer the causal relationship) may not be perfect - for example, if they are only partially valid or informative. The authors show that their geometry-aware approach can outperform standard instrumental variable regression techniques on both simulated and real-world data.
This research is valuable because it provides a more flexible and robust way to estimate causal effects in the presence of imperfect instrumental variables. This is a common scenario in many fields, such as economics, social sciences, and medicine, where directly measuring the relationship between variables of interest can be challenging. By accounting for the underlying geometry of the problem, the proposed method can lead to more accurate and reliable causal inferences.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new geometry-aware instrumental variable regression method that can handle situations where the instrumental variables (IVs) may not be fully valid or informative. The key idea is to incorporate the geometric structure of the problem into the regression model, which allows the method to better cope with violations of the standard IV assumptions.
The authors first provide a theoretical analysis of the geometry of the IV regression problem, showing how the validity and strength of the IVs are related to the angles between different subspaces defined by the variables in the model. They then use this geometric insight to develop a new estimator that explicitly accounts for the angles between these subspaces.
Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed geometry-aware IV regression method can outperform conventional IV regression techniques, especially when the IVs are only partially valid or informative. The authors also provide theoretical guarantees on the consistency and asymptotic normality of their estimator.
This work is related to other recent advances in causal inference with imperfect or leaky instruments, such as Learning Decision Policies from Instrumental Variables through Double Machine Learning, Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments, and Skeleton Regression: A Graph-Based Approach to Estimation with Weaker Assumptions. The geometry-aware approach introduced in this paper provides a complementary perspective that can be useful in a variety of causal inference settings.
Critical Analysis
The authors have made a compelling contribution by developing a new geometry-aware instrumental variable regression method that can handle imperfect or leaky instruments. The theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrate the potential benefits of this approach compared to standard IV regression techniques.
However, there are a few areas that could be explored further:
-
Robustness to Violations of Assumptions: While the authors show that their method can perform well when the IV assumptions are partially violated, it would be valuable to investigate the method's robustness to more severe violations, such as when the IVs are completely invalid or when there are hidden confounders. Techniques like Robust Assessment of Invariant Representations could provide useful insights in this regard.
-
Extension to Non-Linear and High-Dimensional Settings: The current paper focuses on linear models with low-dimensional variables. It would be interesting to see how the geometry-aware approach could be extended to handle non-linear relationships and high-dimensional data, which are common in many real-world applications. The Fourier Approach to Parameter Estimation Problem-One method could potentially provide a useful starting point for such extensions.
-
Interpretability and Practical Implications: While the technical details of the proposed method are well-explained, it would be valuable to further discuss the practical implications and interpretability of the geometry-aware approach. How can the insights gained from the geometric analysis be used to guide the application of IV regression in real-world scenarios?
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the field of causal inference with imperfect instruments. The geometry-aware perspective introduced here could inspire further research and lead to more reliable and robust methods for estimating causal effects in challenging settings.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new geometry-aware instrumental variable regression method that can better handle situations where the instrumental variables are only partially valid or informative. By explicitly incorporating the geometric structure of the problem into the regression model, the authors develop an estimator that can outperform conventional IV regression techniques on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
The key contribution of this work is the novel geometric insight, which allows the method to adapt to violations of the standard IV assumptions. This is a significant advance, as imperfect or leaky instruments are a common challenge in many fields where causal inference is crucial, such as economics, social sciences, and medicine.
While the current paper focuses on linear models and low-dimensional settings, the geometry-aware perspective introduced here could inspire further research to extend the method to handle non-linear relationships and high-dimensional data. Exploring the robustness of the approach to more severe violations of the IV assumptions and further clarifying the practical implications of the geometric analysis would also be valuable directions for future work.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the field of causal inference with imperfect instruments, and the geometry-aware instrumental variable regression method proposed here has the potential to lead to more reliable and robust causal inferences in a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
↗️
Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Regression through Stochastic Approximate Gradients
Yuri Fonseca, Caio Peixoto, Yuri Saporito
0
0
Instrumental variables (IVs) provide a powerful strategy for identifying causal effects in the presence of unobservable confounders. Within the nonparametric setting (NPIV), recent methods have been based on nonlinear generalizations of Two-Stage Least Squares and on minimax formulations derived from moment conditions or duality. In a novel direction, we show how to formulate a functional stochastic gradient descent algorithm to tackle NPIV regression by directly minimizing the populational risk. We provide theoretical support in the form of bounds on the excess risk, and conduct numerical experiments showcasing our method's superior stability and competitive performance relative to current state-of-the-art alternatives. This algorithm enables flexible estimator choices, such as neural networks or kernel based methods, as well as non-quadratic loss functions, which may be suitable for structural equations beyond the setting of continuous outcomes and additive noise. Finally, we demonstrate this flexibility of our framework by presenting how it naturally addresses the important case of binary outcomes, which has received far less attention by recent developments in the NPIV literature.
5/27/2024
Learning Decision Policies with Instrumental Variables through Double Machine Learning
Daqian Shao, Ashkan Soleymani, Francesco Quinzan, Marta Kwiatkowska
0
0
A common issue in learning decision-making policies in data-rich settings is spurious correlations in the offline dataset, which can be caused by hidden confounders. Instrumental variable (IV) regression, which utilises a key unconfounded variable known as the instrument, is a standard technique for learning causal relationships between confounded action, outcome, and context variables. Most recent IV regression algorithms use a two-stage approach, where a deep neural network (DNN) estimator learnt in the first stage is directly plugged into the second stage, in which another DNN is used to estimate the causal effect. Naively plugging the estimator can cause heavy bias in the second stage, especially when regularisation bias is present in the first stage estimator. We propose DML-IV, a non-linear IV regression method that reduces the bias in two-stage IV regressions and effectively learns high-performing policies. We derive a novel learning objective to reduce bias and design the DML-IV algorithm following the double/debiased machine learning (DML) framework. The learnt DML-IV estimator has strong convergence rate and $O(N^{-1/2})$ suboptimality guarantees that match those when the dataset is unconfounded. DML-IV outperforms state-of-the-art IV regression methods on IV regression benchmarks and learns high-performing policies in the presence of instruments.
7/1/2024
Stochastic Optimization Algorithms for Instrumental Variable Regression with Streaming Data
Xuxing Chen, Abhishek Roy, Yifan Hu, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian
0
0
We develop and analyze algorithms for instrumental variable regression by viewing the problem as a conditional stochastic optimization problem. In the context of least-squares instrumental variable regression, our algorithms neither require matrix inversions nor mini-batches and provides a fully online approach for performing instrumental variable regression with streaming data. When the true model is linear, we derive rates of convergence in expectation, that are of order $mathcal{O}(log T/T)$ and $mathcal{O}(1/T^{1-iota})$ for any $iota>0$, respectively under the availability of two-sample and one-sample oracles, respectively, where $T$ is the number of iterations. Importantly, under the availability of the two-sample oracle, our procedure avoids explicitly modeling and estimating the relationship between confounder and the instrumental variables, demonstrating the benefit of the proposed approach over recent works based on reformulating the problem as minimax optimization problems. Numerical experiments are provided to corroborate the theoretical results.
5/31/2024
Bounding Causal Effects with Leaky Instruments
David S. Watson, Jordan Penn, Lee M. Gunderson, Gecia Bravo-Hermsdorff, Afsaneh Mastouri, Ricardo Silva
0
0
Instrumental variables (IVs) are a popular and powerful tool for estimating causal effects in the presence of unobserved confounding. However, classical approaches rely on strong assumptions such as the $textit{exclusion criterion}$, which states that instrumental effects must be entirely mediated by treatments. This assumption often fails in practice. When IV methods are improperly applied to data that do not meet the exclusion criterion, estimated causal effects may be badly biased. In this work, we propose a novel solution that provides $textit{partial}$ identification in linear systems given a set of $textit{leaky instruments}$, which are allowed to violate the exclusion criterion to some limited degree. We derive a convex optimization objective that provides provably sharp bounds on the average treatment effect under some common forms of information leakage, and implement inference procedures to quantify the uncertainty of resulting estimates. We demonstrate our method in a set of experiments with simulated data, where it performs favorably against the state of the art. An accompanying $texttt{R}$ package, $texttt{leakyIV}$, is available from $texttt{CRAN}$.
5/9/2024