SABLE: Staging Blocked Evaluation of Sparse Matrix Computations

Overview

• Sparse matrices often have some structure in how the dense elements are organized
• The inspector-executor model can overlook further specialization in this structure
• The proposed system generates more efficient code by constructing regular loops over blocks in a blocked storage format
• The system performs a specified computation over every element of the block instead of avoiding computing any sparse element
• This approach can significantly speed up SpMV and SpMM operations over state-of-the-art systems

Plain English Explanation

Sparse matrices are matrices with many zero elements. In the real world, these sparse matrices often have some underlying pattern or structure in how the non-zero elements are organized.

While existing systems like the inspector-executor model can inspect these matrices for structure, they may miss opportunities for further optimization.

The proposed system takes a different approach. If the sparse matrix is stored in a blocked format, where the matrix is divided into smaller dense blocks, the system can generate more efficient code. Instead of just avoiding computation on the sparse elements, the system constructs regular loops that operate on these dense blocks.

This allows the system to perform a specific computation over every element in the block, taking advantage of the regularity and density of the blocks. As a result, the system can significantly speed up common operations like sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) and sparse matrix-matrix multiplication (SpMM) compared to other state-of-the-art systems like Partially-Strided Codelets and Sparse Register Tiling.

The system is also designed to be extensible, providing a dense block iterator that allows users to express any computation they want to perform on these dense blocks.

Technical Explanation

The proposed system focuses on the case where the sparse matrix is stored in a blocked storage format. This means the matrix is divided into smaller dense blocks, which can be more efficiently processed than the original sparse matrix.

The key innovation of the system is its ability to generate specialized code that performs a specified computation over the elements in these dense blocks. Rather than just avoiding computation on the sparse elements, the system constructs regular loops that operate on the dense blocks.

This approach allows the system to take advantage of the regularity and density of the blocks, leading to significant performance improvements for operations like SpMV and SpMM compared to other state-of-the-art systems. The system is also designed to be extensible, providing a dense block iterator that allows users to express any computation they want to perform on these dense blocks.

The authors evaluate their system on a range of sparse matrix workloads and show that it can outperform systems like Partially-Strided Codelets and Sparse Register Tiling by a significant margin.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to optimizing sparse matrix computations by leveraging the underlying structure of the sparse matrices. The ability to generate specialized code that takes advantage of dense blocks is a key strength of the system.

However, the paper does not address the potential downsides or limitations of this approach. For example, the system may be sensitive to the specific block size and layout of the sparse matrix, and may not be as effective for sparse matrices with more irregular structure.

Additionally, the paper does not compare the system's performance to other emerging techniques, such as cache blocking for distributed-memory parallel matrix power or auto-tuning methods for run-time data transformation. These techniques may also be able to take advantage of the structure of sparse matrices and could provide valuable comparisons.

Overall, the proposed system is a compelling approach, but further research is needed to understand its limitations and how it compares to other state-of-the-art techniques in the field of sparse matrix optimization.

Conclusion

The proposed system offers a novel way to optimize sparse matrix computations by leveraging the underlying structure of sparse matrices. By generating specialized code that operates on dense blocks of the sparse matrix, the system can significantly improve the performance of common operations like SpMV and SpMM.

This approach has the potential to benefit a wide range of applications that rely on sparse matrix computations, from scientific computing to machine learning. However, further research is needed to fully understand the system's limitations and how it compares to other emerging techniques in the field.