SafeAligner: Safety Alignment against Jailbreak Attacks via Response Disparity Guidance
0
🌿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- As large language models (LLMs) become more advanced, ensuring their safety and security is a critical area of research.
- Current defense strategies against "jailbreak" attacks (attempts to bypass security protocols) often have limited adaptability, restricted capabilities, and high costs.
- The paper introduces SafeAligner, a methodology that aims to fortify defenses against jailbreak attacks at the decoding stage.
Plain English Explanation
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has made securing these models a crucial area of research. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they can also be vulnerable to "jailbreak" attacks, where people try to bypass the safety protocols put in place to prevent the models from producing harmful or undesirable content.
The researchers behind this paper have developed a new approach called SafeAligner to address the limitations of current defense strategies. SafeAligner works by creating two specialized models: a "Sentinel Model" that is trained to promote safety, and an "Intruder Model" that is designed to generate riskier responses.
By comparing the outputs of these two models, SafeAligner can identify harmful tokens and guide the target LLM to produce safer and more beneficial responses. This helps ensure that the LLM remains aligned with safety goals while still maintaining its general capabilities.
The researchers have conducted extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of SafeAligner in increasing the likelihood of beneficial tokens and reducing the occurrence of harmful ones, all while minimizing the impact on the model's overall performance.
Technical Explanation
The SafeAligner methodology is implemented at the decoding stage of the target LLM to fortify defenses against jailbreak attacks.
The researchers begin by developing two specialized models:
- The Sentinel Model: This model is trained to foster safety and promote beneficial responses.
- The Intruder Model: This model is designed to generate riskier, potentially harmful responses.
SafeAligner leverages the disparity in security levels between the outputs of these two models to differentiate between harmful and beneficial tokens. By altering the output token distribution of the target model, SafeAligner can effectively guide the safety alignment and ensure secure alignment with minimal loss to the model's general capability.
The researchers conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of SafeAligner. The results show that this approach can increase the likelihood of beneficial tokens while reducing the occurrence of harmful ones, thereby mitigating fine-tuning-based jailbreak attacks and finding universal jailbreak backdoors.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel approach to defending against jailbreak attacks on LLMs, which is a significant challenge in the field of AI safety and alignment. The researchers have developed a promising methodology that leverages the disparity between two specialized models to guide the safety alignment of the target LLM.
However, the paper does not address certain limitations and potential concerns. For example, the researchers do not discuss the scalability of their approach as the complexity of LLMs continues to grow. Additionally, there may be concerns about the robustness of the Sentinel and Intruder models, as they could potentially be vulnerable to adversarial attacks themselves.
Further research is needed to explore the long-term implications of this approach and to address any unintended consequences or edge cases that may arise. It will also be important to consider the ethical implications of deploying such systems and to ensure that they are designed and used in a responsible and transparent manner.
Conclusion
The SafeAligner methodology presented in this paper represents a significant step forward in the field of LLM safety and alignment. By leveraging the disparity between specialized models, it offers a promising approach to mitigating jailbreak attacks and finding universal jailbreak backdoors while maintaining the general capabilities of the target LLM.
As the development of LLMs continues to advance, research into effective security measures will become increasingly crucial. The insights and techniques presented in this paper could have far-reaching implications for the future of safe and aligned AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
0
SafeAligner: Safety Alignment against Jailbreak Attacks via Response Disparity Guidance
Caishuang Huang, Wanxu Zhao, Rui Zheng, Huijie Lv, Shihan Dou, Sixian Li, Xiao Wang, Enyu Zhou, Junjie Ye, Yuming Yang, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
As the development of large language models (LLMs) rapidly advances, securing these models effectively without compromising their utility has become a pivotal area of research. However, current defense strategies against jailbreak attacks (i.e., efforts to bypass security protocols) often suffer from limited adaptability, restricted general capability, and high cost. To address these challenges, we introduce SafeAligner, a methodology implemented at the decoding stage to fortify defenses against jailbreak attacks. We begin by developing two specialized models: the Sentinel Model, which is trained to foster safety, and the Intruder Model, designed to generate riskier responses. SafeAligner leverages the disparity in security levels between the responses from these models to differentiate between harmful and beneficial tokens, effectively guiding the safety alignment by altering the output token distribution of the target model. Extensive experiments show that SafeAligner can increase the likelihood of beneficial tokens, while reducing the occurrence of harmful ones, thereby ensuring secure alignment with minimal loss to generality.
Read more7/1/2024
🤖
0
How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden States
Zhenhong Zhou, Haiyang Yu, Xinghua Zhang, Rongwu Xu, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li
Large language models (LLMs) rely on safety alignment to avoid responding to malicious user inputs. Unfortunately, jailbreak can circumvent safety guardrails, resulting in LLMs generating harmful content and raising concerns about LLM safety. Due to language models with intensive parameters often regarded as black boxes, the mechanisms of alignment and jailbreak are challenging to elucidate. In this paper, we employ weak classifiers to explain LLM safety through the intermediate hidden states. We first confirm that LLMs learn ethical concepts during pre-training rather than alignment and can identify malicious and normal inputs in the early layers. Alignment actually associates the early concepts with emotion guesses in the middle layers and then refines them to the specific reject tokens for safe generations. Jailbreak disturbs the transformation of early unethical classification into negative emotions. We conduct experiments on models from 7B to 70B across various model families to prove our conclusion. Overall, our paper indicates the intrinsical mechanism of LLM safety and how jailbreaks circumvent safety guardrails, offering a new perspective on LLM safety and reducing concerns. Our code is available at https://github.com/ydyjya/LLM-IHS-Explanation.
Read more6/14/2024
0
SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding
Zhangchen Xu, Fengqing Jiang, Luyao Niu, Jinyuan Jia, Bill Yuchen Lin, Radha Poovendran
As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into real-world applications such as code generation and chatbot assistance, extensive efforts have been made to align LLM behavior with human values, including safety. Jailbreak attacks, aiming to provoke unintended and unsafe behaviors from LLMs, remain a significant/leading LLM safety threat. In this paper, we aim to defend LLMs against jailbreak attacks by introducing SafeDecoding, a safety-aware decoding strategy for LLMs to generate helpful and harmless responses to user queries. Our insight in developing SafeDecoding is based on the observation that, even though probabilities of tokens representing harmful contents outweigh those representing harmless responses, safety disclaimers still appear among the top tokens after sorting tokens by probability in descending order. This allows us to mitigate jailbreak attacks by identifying safety disclaimers and amplifying their token probabilities, while simultaneously attenuating the probabilities of token sequences that are aligned with the objectives of jailbreak attacks. We perform extensive experiments on five LLMs using six state-of-the-art jailbreak attacks and four benchmark datasets. Our results show that SafeDecoding significantly reduces the attack success rate and harmfulness of jailbreak attacks without compromising the helpfulness of responses to benign user queries. SafeDecoding outperforms six defense methods.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep
Xiangyu Qi, Ashwinee Panda, Kaifeng Lyu, Xiao Ma, Subhrajit Roy, Ahmad Beirami, Prateek Mittal, Peter Henderson
The safety alignment of current Large Language Models (LLMs) is vulnerable. Relatively simple attacks, or even benign fine-tuning, can jailbreak aligned models. We argue that many of these vulnerabilities are related to a shared underlying issue: safety alignment can take shortcuts, wherein the alignment adapts a model's generative distribution primarily over only its very first few output tokens. We refer to this issue as shallow safety alignment. In this paper, we present case studies to explain why shallow safety alignment can exist and provide evidence that current aligned LLMs are subject to this issue. We also show how these findings help explain multiple recently discovered vulnerabilities in LLMs, including the susceptibility to adversarial suffix attacks, prefilling attacks, decoding parameter attacks, and fine-tuning attacks. Importantly, we discuss how this consolidated notion of shallow safety alignment sheds light on promising research directions for mitigating these vulnerabilities. For instance, we show that deepening the safety alignment beyond just the first few tokens can often meaningfully improve robustness against some common exploits. Finally, we design a regularized finetuning objective that makes the safety alignment more persistent against fine-tuning attacks by constraining updates on initial tokens. Overall, we advocate that future safety alignment should be made more than just a few tokens deep.
Read more6/11/2024